Slettebø Åshild, Skaar Ragnhild, Brodtkorb Kari, Skisland Anne
Centre for Care Research - Southern Norway and Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Grimstad, Norway.
Centre for Care Research - Southern Norway and Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Jun;32(2):645-653. doi: 10.1111/scs.12490. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
Ethical challenges arise in all types of care, and leaders need to be aware of how to resolve these challenges. Healthcare systems tend to be organised around medical conditions, and the patient is often faced with a series of uncoordinated visits to multiple specialties. Ideally, care should be organised around the patient's needs.
The purpose of this article was to highlight some ethical challenges perceived by leaders with responsibility for management and service distribution, finance and ensuring quality of community health services for older people.
This study had a qualitative design with a qualitative content analysis of one focus group with six leaders that met four times in total. Leaders from the community healthcare sector in one Norwegian municipality were included, representing both nursing homes and home-based health care. The study followed the intentions of the Declaration of Helsinki and standard ethical principles. The Norwegian Social Science Data Services approved the study. All participants voluntarily gave written informed consent.
The main theme that emerged from this study was the ethical challenge leaders felt in the form of an inherent conflict between a caring rationale versus economic or technological rationales. Four categories emerged: (i) Management: quality versus economy; (ii) Prioritisation: fair distribution of healthcare services; (iii) Responsibility: considering individuals' needs versus the needs of the whole community; and (iv) Welfare technology: possibilities and challenges.
Leaders' responsibilities in community health care for older people need to strike a balance between ethical principles in the management of limited resources.
各类医疗保健中都会出现伦理挑战,领导者需要知道如何应对这些挑战。医疗保健系统往往围绕疾病状况来组织,患者常常要面对一系列不协调的多专科就诊。理想情况下,医疗保健应围绕患者需求来组织。
本文旨在强调负责管理、服务分配、财务以及确保老年人社区卫生服务质量的领导者所察觉到的一些伦理挑战。
本研究采用定性设计,对一个由六名领导者组成的焦点小组进行定性内容分析,该小组共会面四次。纳入了挪威一个自治市社区医疗保健部门的领导者,他们代表养老院和居家医疗保健机构。该研究遵循《赫尔辛基宣言》的宗旨和标准伦理原则。挪威社会科学数据服务中心批准了该研究。所有参与者均自愿签署书面知情同意书。
本研究中出现的主要主题是领导者所感受到的伦理挑战,表现为关怀理念与经济或技术理念之间的内在冲突。出现了四类挑战:(i)管理:质量与经济;(ii)优先排序:医疗保健服务的公平分配;(iii)责任:考虑个人需求与整个社区的需求;(iv)福利技术:可能性与挑战。
在老年人社区医疗保健中,领导者的职责需要在有限资源管理的伦理原则之间取得平衡。