• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究中的两用问题——一个日益受到关注的主题?

Dual use issues in research - A subject of increasing concern?

作者信息

Drew Trevor W, Mueller-Doblies Uwe Ulex

机构信息

Animal & Plant Health Agency, Addlestone KT15 3NB, United Kingdom; University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Epibiosafe Ltd., 30 St Johns Road, Woking GU21 7SA, United Kingdom; University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2017 Oct 20;35(44):5990-5994. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.109. Epub 2017 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.109
PMID:28835345
Abstract

Dual use is defined as the application of materials, knowledge or technologies for military or terrorist purposes, as well as for good. In biological science, it is considered to be a growing threat as the genetics of pathogenicity traits and toxins are becoming on one hand elucidated in a detail that was not anticipated 20years ago and on the other hand technological advances in genetic engineering and synthetic biology are continually enabling easier access to these technologies. On a theoretical and policy level, much has happened over the past decade, but translating these policies and concepts to operational level awareness and robust processes requires more attention. Where the research is conducted, scientists have to make ethical judgements and account for their data sharing and publication policies. How can we ensure the requirement for dual use review is taken on board, but is not skewing research detrimentally and imposing a disproportionate burden?

摘要

两用性被定义为将材料、知识或技术用于军事或恐怖主义目的以及用于有益目的。在生物科学领域,这被视为一种日益增长的威胁,因为致病性状和毒素的遗传学一方面正以前所未有的细节被阐明,另一方面基因工程和合成生物学的技术进步不断使人们更容易获取这些技术。在理论和政策层面,过去十年已经发生了很多事情,但将这些政策和概念转化为实际操作层面的认识和健全流程需要更多关注。在进行研究的地方,科学家必须做出伦理判断,并说明他们的数据共享和发表政策。我们如何确保两用性审查的要求得到落实,但又不会对研究造成不利影响,也不会施加过重负担呢?

相似文献

1
Dual use issues in research - A subject of increasing concern?研究中的两用问题——一个日益受到关注的主题?
Vaccine. 2017 Oct 20;35(44):5990-5994. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.109. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
2
Implementing the new U.S. dual-use policy.实施新的美国两用政策。
Science. 2012 Jun 22;336(6088):1525-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1223995.
3
Impacts of dual-use research on life science researchers including veterinarians.两用研究对包括兽医在内的生命科学研究人员的影响。
Am J Vet Res. 2013 Jan;74(1):166-70. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.74.1.166.
4
Governance of dual-use research: an ethical dilemma.两用研究的治理:一个伦理困境。
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Sep;87(9):720-3. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.051383.
5
Awareness and Attitudes of Research Students Toward Dual-use Research of Concern in Pakistan: A Cross-sectional Questionnaire.巴基斯坦研究型学生对两用研究的认识和态度:一项横断面问卷调查。
Health Secur. 2019 May/Jun;17(3):229-239. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0002.
6
Preventing biological weapon development through the governance of life science research.通过生命科学研究治理来防止生物武器发展。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Mar;10(1):17-37. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0091.
7
The concept of governance in dual-use research.两用研究中的治理概念。
Med Health Care Philos. 2014 Aug;17(3):447-57. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9542-9.
8
Ethical and regulatory challenges posed by synthetic biology.合成生物学带来的伦理和监管挑战。
Perspect Biol Med. 2012;55(4):590-607. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2012.0043.
9
Responsible conduct by life scientists in an age of terrorism.恐怖主义时代生命科学家的责任行为。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2009 Sep;15(3):293-301. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9124-7. Epub 2009 May 7.
10
Between Scylla and Charybdis: reconciling competing data management demands in the life sciences.处于两难境地:协调生命科学中相互冲突的数据管理需求。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 May 17;17(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0112-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Landscape of Dual-Use Research Governance in Malaysia.马来西亚两用研究治理概况
Appl Biosaf. 2025 Jun 5;30(2):189-197. doi: 10.1089/apb.2024.0054. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Ethics Committees' Practices in Healthcare, Banking and Research: Key Requirements for Their Functionality.伦理委员会在医疗保健、银行业和研究领域的实践:其运作的关键要求
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14310. doi: 10.1111/jep.14310.
3
Sharing sensitive data in life sciences: an overview of centralized and federated approaches.生命科学领域中敏感数据的共享:集中式和联邦式方法概述。
Brief Bioinform. 2024 May 23;25(4). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae262.
4
Public awareness, acceptability and risk perception about infectious diseases dual-use research of concern: a cross-sectional survey.公众对关注的传染病双重用途研究的认识、可接受性和风险感知:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 6;10(1):e029134. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029134.
5
Current progress and future opportunities in applications of bioinformatics for biodefense and pathogen detection: report from the Winter Mid-Atlantic Microbiome Meet-up, College Park, MD, January 10, 2018.生物信息学在生物防御和病原体检测中的应用的当前进展和未来机遇:2018 年 1 月 10 日,马里兰州学院公园冬季中大西洋微生物组会议报告。
Microbiome. 2018 Nov 5;6(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0582-5.
6
Confronting the threat of bioterrorism: realities, challenges, and defensive strategies.应对生物恐怖主义威胁:现实、挑战与防御策略。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;19(1):e2-e13. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30298-6. Epub 2018 Oct 16.