• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与较少的人交谈会导致拥有更具可塑性的语言表征。

Talking to fewer people leads to having more malleable linguistic representations.

作者信息

Lev-Ari Shiri

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183593. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0183593
PMID:28837699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5570344/
Abstract

We learn language from our social environment. In general, the more sources we have, the less informative each of them is, and the less weight we should assign it. If this is the case, people who interact with fewer others should be more susceptible to the influence of each of their interlocutors. This paper tests whether indeed people who interact with fewer other people have more malleable phonological representations. Using a perceptual learning paradigm, this paper shows that individuals who regularly interact with fewer others are more likely to change their boundary between /d/ and /t/ following exposure to an atypical speaker. It further shows that the effect of number of interlocutors is not due to differences in ability to learn the speaker's speech patterns, but specific to likelihood of generalizing the learned pattern. These results have implications for both language learning and language change, as they suggest that individuals with smaller social networks might play an important role in propagating linguistic changes.

摘要

我们从社会环境中学习语言。一般来说,我们拥有的信息源越多,每个信息源的信息量就越少,我们赋予它的权重也就越低。如果是这样的话,与他人互动较少的人应该更容易受到每个对话者的影响。本文测试了与他人互动较少的人是否确实具有更易变的语音表征。使用感知学习范式,本文表明,经常与他人互动较少的个体在接触到非典型发音者后,更有可能改变他们在/d/和/t/之间的界限。它进一步表明,对话者数量的影响不是由于学习说话者语音模式的能力差异,而是特定于将所学模式泛化的可能性。这些结果对语言学习和语言变化都有影响,因为它们表明社交网络较小的个体可能在传播语言变化方面发挥重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a517/5570344/6c466237659f/pone.0183593.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a517/5570344/59662e789e6a/pone.0183593.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a517/5570344/4063003d3bc0/pone.0183593.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a517/5570344/29f44fb70a5e/pone.0183593.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a517/5570344/0cd8da1fcf4c/pone.0183593.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a517/5570344/6c466237659f/pone.0183593.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a517/5570344/59662e789e6a/pone.0183593.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a517/5570344/4063003d3bc0/pone.0183593.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a517/5570344/29f44fb70a5e/pone.0183593.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a517/5570344/0cd8da1fcf4c/pone.0183593.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a517/5570344/6c466237659f/pone.0183593.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Talking to fewer people leads to having more malleable linguistic representations.与较少的人交谈会导致拥有更具可塑性的语言表征。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183593. eCollection 2017.
2
Social network size can influence linguistic malleability and the propagation of linguistic change.社交网络规模会影响语言的可塑性和语言变化的传播。
Cognition. 2018 Jul;176:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
3
The Effect of Social Network Size on Hashtag Adoption on Twitter.社交网络规模对推特上主题标签使用的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;42(8):3149-3158. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12675. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
4
Development in children's comprehension of linguistic register.儿童对语言语域理解的发展。
Child Dev. 2010 Nov-Dec;81(6):1678-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01502.x.
5
The ITALK project: a developmental robotics approach to the study of individual, social, and linguistic learning.ITALK 项目:一种发展机器人学方法,用于研究个体、社会和语言学习。
Top Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;6(3):534-44. doi: 10.1111/tops.12099. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
6
The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.说话者的交际风格会影响语言理解吗?来自反语理解的 ERP 证据。
Brain Res. 2010 Jan 22;1311:121-35. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.077. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
7
Paralinguistic correlates of conceptual structure.概念结构的副语言关联
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):462-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03196507.
8
Staging casual conversations for people with dementia.为患有痴呆症的人安排日常对话。
Dementia (London). 2014 Nov;13(6):834-53. doi: 10.1177/1471301213488609. Epub 2013 May 22.
9
Learning general phonological rules from distributional information: a computational model.从分布信息中学习通用语音规则:一种计算模型。
Cogn Sci. 2015 Apr;39(3):647-66. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12167. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
10
Linguistic Convergence to Observed Versus Expected Behavior in an Alien-Language Map Task.语言趋同对陌生语言地图任务中观察到的与预期行为的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;44(4):e12829. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12829.

引用本文的文献

1
Linguistic diversity shapes flexible speech perception in school age children.语言多样性塑造了学龄儿童灵活的言语感知能力。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 21;14(1):28825. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80430-1.
2
Geographical and social isolation drive the evolution of Austronesian languages.地理和社会隔离推动了南岛语系的演化。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0243171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243171. eCollection 2020.
3
Population Size and the Rate of Language Evolution: A Test Across Indo-European, Austronesian, and Bantu Languages.人口规模与语言演变速度:对印欧语系、南岛语系和班图语系语言的一项测试

本文引用的文献

1
How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction.社交网络异质性如何促进词汇获取和词汇预测。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Apr;45(3):528-538. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0675-y.
2
How the Size of Our Social Network Influences Our Semantic Skills.我们社交网络的规模如何影响我们的语义技能。
Cogn Sci. 2016 Nov;40(8):2050-2064. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12317. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
3
Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.强大的语音感知:识别熟悉的内容,将其推广到相似的内容,并适应新的内容。
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 27;9:576. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00576. eCollection 2018.
Psychol Rev. 2015 Apr;122(2):148-203. doi: 10.1037/a0038695.
4
Stick to the script: the effect of witnessing multiple actors on children's imitation.坚持剧本:多名演员对儿童模仿的影响。
Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):536-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
5
Executive control influences linguistic representations.
Mem Cognit. 2014 Feb;42(2):247-63. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0352-3.
6
Majority-biased transmission in chimpanzees and human children, but not orangutans.在黑猩猩和人类儿童中存在多数偏向性传播,但在猩猩中则不存在。
Curr Biol. 2012 Apr 24;22(8):727-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
7
The word frequency effect: a review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German.词频效应:近期发展综述及其对德语中频率估计选择的影响
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(5):412-24. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000123.
8
Going with the flow: preschoolers prefer nondissenters as informants.随波逐流:学龄前儿童更喜欢不持异议者作为信息提供者。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;20(3):372-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02291.x. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
9
Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary.频率重要吗?父母的输入与词汇习得
J Child Lang. 2008 Aug;35(3):515-31. doi: 10.1017/S0305000907008641.
10
Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?人们在理解过程中会运用语言生成来进行预测吗?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Mar;11(3):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Jan 24.