Malesker Mark A, Callahan-Lyon Priscilla, Ireland Belinda, Irwin Richard S
Pharmacy Practice Department, Creighton University, Omaha, NE.
Mercy Clinic, Adamstown, MD.
Chest. 2017 Nov;152(5):1021-1037. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
Acute cough associated with the common cold (CACC) causes significant impairment in quality of life. Effective treatment approaches are needed for CACC. We conducted a systematic review on the management of CACC to update the recommendations and suggestions of the CHEST 2006 guideline on this topic.
This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) asked the question: Is there evidence of clinically relevant treatment effects for pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic therapies in reducing the duration/severity of acute CACC? Studies of adults and pediatric patients with CACC were included and assessed for relevance and quality. Based on the systematic review, guideline suggestions were developed and voted on using the American College of Chest Physicians organization methodology.
Six systematic reviews and four primary studies identified from updated literature searches for each of the reviews or from hand searching were included and reported data on 6,496 participants with CACC who received one or more of a variety of interventions. The studies used an assortment of descriptors and assessments to identify CACC.
The evidence supporting the management of CACC is overall of low quality. This document provides treatment suggestions based on the best currently available evidence and identifies gaps in our knowledge and areas for future research.
与普通感冒相关的急性咳嗽(CACC)会严重影响生活质量。需要有效的治疗方法来治疗CACC。我们对CACC的管理进行了系统评价,以更新CHEST 2006年关于该主题指南的建议。
这项对随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价提出了一个问题:是否有证据表明药物或非药物疗法在降低急性CACC的持续时间/严重程度方面具有临床相关的治疗效果?纳入了对患有CACC的成人和儿科患者的研究,并对其相关性和质量进行评估。基于系统评价,使用美国胸科医师学会的组织方法制定并投票表决了指南建议。
从更新的文献检索中为每个评价确定的六项系统评价和四项原始研究,或通过手工检索获得的研究被纳入,并报告了6496名接受了一种或多种不同干预措施的CACC参与者的数据。这些研究使用了各种各样的描述符和评估方法来识别CACC。
支持CACC管理的证据总体质量较低。本文档根据目前可得的最佳证据提供了治疗建议,并确定了我们知识中的空白以及未来研究的领域。