• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在具有行为抑制的儿童的点探测任务表现上实施扩散模型。

Implementation of the diffusion model on dot-probe task performance in children with behavioral inhibition.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2022 Apr;86(3):831-843. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01532-3. Epub 2021 May 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-021-01532-3
PMID:34047824
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8627521/
Abstract

Attentional bias to threat, the process of preferentially attending to potentially threatening environmental stimuli over neutral stimuli, is positively associated with behavioral inhibition (BI) and trait anxiety. However, the most used measure of attentional bias to threat, the dot-probe task, has been criticized for demonstrating poor reliability. The present study aimed to assess whether utilizing a sequential sampling model to describe performance could detect adequate test-retest reliability for the dot-probe task, demonstrate stronger cueing effects, and improve the association with neural signals of early attention. One hundred and twenty children aged 9-12 years completed the dot-probe task twice. During the second administration, event-related potentials (ERPs) were obtained as time-sensitive neural markers of attention. BI was not associated with traditional or diffusion model measures of performance. Traditional and diffusion model measures of performance were also not associated with N1, P2, or N2 ERP amplitude. There were main effects of Visit, in which RTs were faster and standard deviation of RT smaller during the second administration due to an increase in drift rate and a decrease in non-decision time. The traditional RT bias score (r = 0.06) and bias scores formed via diffusion model parameters (all r's < 0.40) all demonstrated poor reliability. Results confirm recommendations to move away from using the dot-probe task as the primary or sole index of attentional bias.

摘要

注意偏向于威胁,即优先注意潜在威胁性环境刺激而不是中性刺激的过程,与行为抑制(BI)和特质焦虑呈正相关。然而,最常用于测量威胁注意偏向的点探测任务,因其可靠性差而受到批评。本研究旨在评估使用顺序采样模型来描述表现是否可以检测到点探测任务的足够测试-重测信度,展示更强的提示效应,并改善与早期注意的神经信号的关联。120 名 9-12 岁的儿童两次完成点探测任务。在第二次给药期间,获得事件相关电位(ERP)作为注意的时间敏感神经标志物。BI 与传统或扩散模型的表现测量无关。传统和扩散模型的表现测量也与 N1、P2 或 N2 ERP 幅度无关。由于漂移率增加和非决策时间减少,存在访问的主要效应,在第二次给药时 RT 更快,RT 的标准偏差更小。传统的 RT 偏差得分(r=0.06)和通过扩散模型参数形成的偏差得分(所有 r<0.40)的可靠性都很差。结果证实了建议,即不再将点探测任务作为注意偏向的主要或唯一指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3494/8627521/6f9b70bc882f/nihms-1714774-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3494/8627521/39594a759de3/nihms-1714774-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3494/8627521/4576fe3adf25/nihms-1714774-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3494/8627521/6f9b70bc882f/nihms-1714774-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3494/8627521/39594a759de3/nihms-1714774-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3494/8627521/4576fe3adf25/nihms-1714774-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3494/8627521/6f9b70bc882f/nihms-1714774-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of the diffusion model on dot-probe task performance in children with behavioral inhibition.在具有行为抑制的儿童的点探测任务表现上实施扩散模型。
Psychol Res. 2022 Apr;86(3):831-843. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01532-3. Epub 2021 May 28.
2
Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety.在点探测任务中,对威胁的注意偏向的行为和 ERP 测量:可靠性差,与焦虑无关。
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 4;5:1368. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01368. eCollection 2014.
3
Electrocortical evidence for rapid allocation of attention to threat in the dot-probe task.点探测任务中对威胁快速分配注意力的皮层电活动证据。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Apr;10(4):577-83. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu098. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
4
Neural correlates of the attentional bias towards pain-related faces in fibromyalgia patients: An ERP study using a dot-probe task.纤维肌痛症患者对面部疼痛相关线索的注意偏向的神经相关因素:一项使用点探测任务的 ERP 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Feb 10;166:108141. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108141. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
5
Attentional bias in MDD: ERP components analysis and classification using a dot-probe task.抑郁障碍的注意偏向:使用点探测任务的 ERP 成分分析和分类。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Oct;164:169-179. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
6
Extended testing with the dot-probe task increases test-retest reliability and validity.使用点探测任务进行扩展测试可提高重测信度和效度。
Cogn Process. 2019 Feb;20(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0886-1. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
7
Neural correlates of attention biases, behavioral inhibition, and social anxiety in children: An ERP study.儿童注意力偏差、行为抑制和社交焦虑的神经关联:一项事件相关电位研究。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jun;19:200-10. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
8
Event-related potentials of attentional bias toward faces in the dot-probe task: A systematic review.点探测任务中对面孔注意偏向的事件相关电位:一项系统综述。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Jun;55(6):e13051. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13051. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
9
Reliability (or lack thereof) of smartphone ecological momentary assessment of visual dot probe attention bias toward threat indices.智能手机生态瞬时评估视觉点探测注意偏向威胁指标的可靠性(或缺乏可靠性)。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2024 Mar;82:101918. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101918. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
10
Electrophysiological correlates of attentional bias towards threat in children with high levels of social anxiety.社交焦虑水平较高的儿童对威胁的注意偏向的电生理相关性。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Feb;23(1):190-202. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01042-8. Epub 2022 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural Brain Correlates of Childhood Inhibited Temperament: An ENIGMA-Anxiety Mega-Analysis.儿童抑制性气质的脑结构关联:一项ENIGMA-焦虑症大型分析。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2025.06.026.
2
Trial-level ERPs predicted behavioral responses during self-referential processing in late childhood.在儿童晚期的自我参照处理过程中,试验水平的 ERPs 预测了行为反应。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024 Feb 16;19(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae011.
3
Frontal alpha asymmetry in anxious school-aged children during completion of a threat identification task.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the reliability of attention bias and attention bias variability measures in the dot-probe task among people with social anxiety disorder.评估社交焦虑障碍人群在点探测任务中注意偏向和注意偏向可变性测量的可靠性。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Sep;32(9):883-888. doi: 10.1037/pas0000912. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
2
Threat-related Attention Bias in Socioemotional Development: A Critical Review and Methodological Considerations.社会情感发展中与威胁相关的注意偏向:批判性综述与方法学考量
Dev Rev. 2019 Mar;51:31-57. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
3
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Eye-Tracking of Attention to Threat in Child and Adolescent Anxiety.
焦虑学龄儿童在完成威胁识别任务时的额侧α不对称性。
Biol Psychol. 2023 Apr;179:108550. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108550. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
系统评价和荟萃分析:儿童和青少年焦虑中对威胁的眼动追踪。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;59(1):88-99.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
4
Attentional allocation to task-irrelevant fearful faces is not automatic: experimental evidence for the conditional hypothesis of emotional selection.对任务无关的恐惧面孔的注意力分配不是自动的:情绪选择的条件假设的实验证据。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Mar;34(2):288-301. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1622512. Epub 2019 May 25.
5
Large-scale analysis of test-retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures.大规模分析自我调节措施的重测信度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 19;116(12):5472-5477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818430116. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
6
Computational Modeling Applied to the Dot-Probe Task Yields Improved Reliability and Mechanistic Insights.计算建模应用于点探测任务可提高可靠性和机制见解。
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 1;85(7):606-612. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
7
Response time modeling reveals multiple contextual cuing mechanisms.响应时间建模揭示了多种上下文提示机制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1644-1665. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1364-y.
8
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences.可靠性悖论:为何稳健的认知任务不能产生可靠的个体差异。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1166-1186. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1.
9
Unreliability as a threat to understanding psychopathology: The cautionary tale of attentional bias.不可靠性对理解精神病理学构成的威胁:注意偏向的警示故事。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2016 Aug;125(6):840-51. doi: 10.1037/abn0000184. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
10
Retest reliability of the parameters of the Ratcliff diffusion model.拉特克利夫扩散模型参数的重测信度。
Psychol Res. 2017 May;81(3):629-652. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0770-5. Epub 2016 Apr 23.