Lai Kuan-Ming, Lin Jen-Tsun, Lu Hsueh-Ju, Liang Chia-Chun, Chen Mu-Kuan
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun;14(3):247-255. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12764. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC). However, for very elderly patients, the comparison of benefit/risk between definitive radiotherapy (RT) with and without systemic chemotherapy was equivocal.
The study was a single-institute, retrospective, cohort study. Seventy patients aged ≥75 years who had a locally advanced HNC were enrolled. The patients were divided into those with CRT and those with RT alone. Survival, compliance/adverse events and independent prognostic factors were analyzed.
For baseline characteristics, the patients who received RT alone had worse performance status, comorbidity score and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. However, during definitive therapy, the CRT group had more adverse events such as neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. There were no significant differences in disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.864 and 0.788, respectively). As to OS, several independent prognostic factors were identified. Performance status (hazard ratio [HR], 2.312; confidence interval [CI], 1.176-4.546; P = 0.015), clinical T staging (HR, 2.240; 95% CI, 1.021-4.913; P = 0.004) and total RT dose (HR, 2.555; 95% CI, 1.246-5.238; P = 0.010) were independent prognostic factors of OS.
Definitive RT with or without systemic chemotherapy did not significantly influence DSS and OS for very elderly patients. Therefore, for elderly patients aged ≥ 75 years who have HNC, conservative RT might be sufficient for treatment purposes.
根治性放化疗(CRT)是局部晚期头颈癌(HNC)的标准治疗方法。然而,对于高龄患者,单纯根治性放疗(RT)与联合全身化疗的获益/风险比较并不明确。
本研究为单机构回顾性队列研究。纳入70例年龄≥75岁的局部晚期HNC患者。患者分为接受CRT组和单纯接受RT组。分析生存率、依从性/不良事件及独立预后因素。
就基线特征而言,单纯接受RT的患者体能状态、合并症评分及中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值更差。然而,在根治性治疗期间,CRT组有更多不良事件,如中性粒细胞减少、发热性中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少。疾病特异性生存率(DSS)和总生存率(OS)无显著差异(P分别为0.864和0.788)。关于OS,确定了几个独立预后因素。体能状态(风险比[HR],2.312;置信区间[CI],1.176 - 4.546;P = 0.015)、临床T分期(HR,2.240;95%CI,1.021 - 4.913;P = 0.004)和总放疗剂量(HR,2.555;95%CI,1.246 - 5.238;P = 0.010)是OS的独立预后因素。
对于高龄患者,单纯根治性RT或联合全身化疗对DSS和OS均无显著影响。因此,对于年龄≥75岁的HNC老年患者,保守的RT可能足以达到治疗目的。