Suppr超能文献

实施世卫组织综合工具评估母婴儿童保健质量:来自马拉维五个地区的结果和经验教训。

Implementing the WHO integrated tool to assess quality of care for mothers, newborns and children: results and lessons learnt from five districts in Malawi.

机构信息

Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

UNICEF, Lilongwe, Malawi.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 25;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1461-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2014 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed a new tool to be used to assess the quality of care for mothers, newborns and children provided at healthcare facility level. This paper reports on the feasibility of using the tool, its limitations and strengths.

METHODS

Across 5 districts in Malawi, 35 healthcare facilities were assessed. The WHO tool includes checklists, interviews and observation of case management by which care is assessed against agreed standards using a Likert scale (1 lowest: not meeting standard, 5 highest: compliant with standard). Descriptive statistics were used to provide summary scores for each standard. A 'dashboard' system was developed to display the results.

RESULTS

For maternal care three areas met standards; 1) supportive care for admitted patients (71% of healthcare facilities scored 4 or 5); 2) prevention and management of infections during pregnancy (71% scored 4 or 5); and 3) management of unsatisfactory progress of labour (84% scored 4 or 5). Availability of essential equipment and supplies was noted to be a critical barrier to achieving satisfactory standards of paediatric care (mean score; standard deviation: 2.9; SD 0.95) and child care (2.7; SD 1.1). Infection control is inadequate across all districts for maternal, newborn and paediatric care. Quality of care varies across districts with a mean (SD) score for all standards combined of 3 (SD 0.19) for the worst performing district and 4 (SD 0.27) for the best. The best performing district has an average score of 4 (SD 0.27). Hospitals had good scores for overall infrastructure, essential drugs, organisation of care and management of preterm labour. However, health centres were better at case management of HIV/AIDS patients and follow-up of sick children.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to develop an expanded framework of standards which is inclusive of all areas of care. In addition, it is important to ensure structure, process and outcomes of health care are reflected.

摘要

背景

2014 年,世界卫生组织(WHO)开发了一种新工具,用于评估医疗机构提供的母婴和儿童保健服务质量。本文报告了该工具的可行性、局限性和优势。

方法

在马拉维的 5 个地区,对 35 家医疗机构进行了评估。该工具包括检查表、访谈和病例管理观察,通过李克特量表(1 表示最低:不符合标准,5 表示最高:符合标准)对护理服务进行评估。使用描述性统计方法为每个标准提供总结分数。开发了一个“仪表板”系统来显示结果。

结果

在母婴保健方面,有三个领域符合标准:1)对住院患者的支持性护理(71%的医疗机构得分 4 或 5);2)预防和管理妊娠期间感染(71%的医疗机构得分 4 或 5);3)管理分娩进展不顺利(84%的医疗机构得分 4 或 5)。基本设备和用品的可用性被认为是实现儿科保健(平均得分;标准差:2.9;SD 0.95)和儿童保健(2.7;SD 1.1)满意标准的关键障碍。所有地区的感染控制在母婴、新生儿和儿科保健方面都不足。护理质量在各地区之间存在差异,所有标准的平均(SD)得分为 3(SD 0.19),得分最差的地区为 4(SD 0.27),得分最好的地区为 4(SD 0.27)。得分最好的地区的平均得分为 4(SD 0.27)。医院在整体基础设施、基本药物、护理组织和早产管理方面得分较高。然而,卫生中心在艾滋病病毒/艾滋病患者的病例管理和患病儿童的随访方面做得更好。

结论

需要制定一个更广泛的标准框架,包括所有护理领域。此外,确保医疗保健的结构、过程和结果得到反映也很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc58/5572070/82c7510c8157/12884_2017_1461_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验