• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运动幅度、探测概率和实际种群密度对种群密度常用估计方法的影响。

Effects of scale of movement, detection probability, and true population density on common methods of estimating population density.

机构信息

University of Georgia, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, D.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, PO Drawer E, Aiken, SC, 29802, USA.

United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 25;7(1):9446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09746-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-09746-5
PMID:28842589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5573344/
Abstract

Knowledge of population density is necessary for effective management and conservation of wildlife, yet rarely are estimators compared in their robustness to effects of ecological and observational processes, which can greatly influence accuracy and precision of density estimates. In this study, we simulate biological and observational processes using empirical data to assess effects of animal scale of movement, true population density, and probability of detection on common density estimators. We also apply common data collection and analytical techniques in the field and evaluate their ability to estimate density of a globally widespread species. We find that animal scale of movement had the greatest impact on accuracy of estimators, although all estimators suffered reduced performance when detection probability was low, and we provide recommendations as to when each field and analytical technique is most appropriately employed. The large influence of scale of movement on estimator accuracy emphasizes the importance of effective post-hoc calculation of area sampled or use of methods that implicitly account for spatial variation. In particular, scale of movement impacted estimators substantially, such that area covered and spacing of detectors (e.g. cameras, traps, etc.) must reflect movement characteristics of the focal species to reduce bias in estimates of movement and thus density.

摘要

了解种群密度对于野生动物的有效管理和保护是必要的,但很少有估计器在其对生态和观测过程的影响的稳健性方面进行比较,这些过程会极大地影响密度估计的准确性和精度。在这项研究中,我们使用经验数据模拟生物和观测过程,以评估动物运动范围、真实种群密度和检测概率对常见密度估计器的影响。我们还在现场应用常见的数据收集和分析技术,并评估它们估计全球广泛分布物种密度的能力。我们发现,动物运动范围对估计器的准确性影响最大,尽管当检测概率较低时,所有估计器的性能都会降低,我们还提供了建议,说明何时最适合使用每种现场和分析技术。运动范围对估计器准确性的巨大影响强调了有效计算采样面积或使用隐含考虑空间变化的方法的重要性。特别是,动物运动范围对估计器产生了重大影响,因此,探测器(例如相机、陷阱等)所覆盖的区域和间距必须反映焦点物种的运动特征,以减少对运动和因此对密度的估计偏差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6004/5573344/865b3fc48564/41598_2017_9746_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6004/5573344/81a0c1ccf199/41598_2017_9746_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6004/5573344/865b3fc48564/41598_2017_9746_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6004/5573344/81a0c1ccf199/41598_2017_9746_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6004/5573344/865b3fc48564/41598_2017_9746_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of scale of movement, detection probability, and true population density on common methods of estimating population density.运动幅度、探测概率和实际种群密度对种群密度常用估计方法的影响。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 25;7(1):9446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09746-5.
2
Estimating population density for disease risk assessment: The importance of understanding the area of influence of traps using wild pigs as an example.估计疾病风险评估中的种群密度:以野猪为例理解陷阱影响区域的重要性。
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Jun 1;141:33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
3
Pairing field methods to improve inference in wildlife surveys while accommodating detection covariance.结合野外调查方法来改进野生动物调查的推断,同时适应检测协方差。
Ecol Appl. 2017 Oct;27(7):2031-2047. doi: 10.1002/eap.1587. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
4
Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities.具有已知小型哺乳动物密度的空间捕获-再捕获模型性能
Ecol Appl. 2015 Apr;25(3):695-705. doi: 10.1890/14-0960.1.
5
A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets.使用蒙特卡罗模拟对完全枚举的现场数据集进行无图密度估计器的比较。
BMC Ecol. 2008 Apr 17;8:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-8-6.
6
A camera-based method for estimating absolute density in animals displaying home range behaviour.一种基于摄像头的方法,用于估计具有家域行为的动物的绝对密度。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 May;87(3):825-837. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12787. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
7
Spatial capture--recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity.空间捕捉-再捕获模型用于联合估计种群密度和景观连通性。
Ecology. 2013 Feb;94(2):287-94. doi: 10.1890/12-0413.1.
8
Evaluation of camera trap-based abundance estimators for unmarked populations.基于相机陷阱的无标记种群丰度估计器评估。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Oct;31(7):e02410. doi: 10.1002/eap.2410. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
9
Trap configuration and spacing influences parameter estimates in spatial capture-recapture models.陷阱配置和间距会影响空间捕获-再捕获模型中的参数估计。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 5;9(2):e88025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088025. eCollection 2014.
10
Camera trap placement and the potential for bias due to trails and other features.相机陷阱的设置以及由于痕迹和其他特征而导致的偏差的可能性。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 18;12(10):e0186679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186679. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal timing to estimate moose Alces alces demographic parameters using remote cameras.使用远程摄像机估计驼鹿(Alces alces)种群统计学参数的最佳时机。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05603-y.
2
Influence of bait and habitat on site visitation by wild pigs (Sus scrofa).诱饵和栖息地对野猪(Sus scrofa)到访地点的影响。
Pest Manag Sci. 2025 Aug;81(8):4667-4676. doi: 10.1002/ps.8834. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
3
DNA metabarcoding reveals consumption of diverse community of amphibians by invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the southeastern United States.

本文引用的文献

1
Inferring invasive species abundance using removal data from management actions.利用管理行动中的清除数据推断入侵物种的数量。
Ecol Appl. 2016 Oct;26(7):2339-2346. doi: 10.1002/eap.1383. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
2
The effects of urbanization on population density, occupancy, and detection probability of wild felids.城市化对野生猫科动物种群密度、占有率及检测概率的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2015 Oct;25(7):1880-95. doi: 10.1890/14-1664.1.
3
Application of Spatial and Closed Capture-Recapture Models on Known Population of the Western Derby Eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) in Senegal.
DNA 代谢组学揭示了入侵的野生猪(Sus scrofa)在美国东南部食用多种两栖动物。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 28;13(1):20889. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48139-9.
4
Variance in offspring sex ratio and maternal allocation in a highly invasive mammal.一种高度入侵性哺乳动物后代性别比例和母体分配的差异
Ecol Evol. 2023 May 25;13(5):e10136. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10136. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Habitat quality influences trade-offs in animal movement along the exploration-exploitation continuum.生境质量影响动物在探索-开发连续体上的运动权衡。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 24;13(1):4814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31457-3.
6
Behavioral state resource selection in invasive wild pigs in the Southeastern United States.美国东南部入侵性野猪的行为状态资源选择。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 25;11(1):6924. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86363-3.
7
A comparison of cost and quality of three methods for estimating density for wild pig (Sus scrofa).三种野猪(Sus scrofa)密度估计方法的成本与质量比较。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 6;10(1):2047. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58937-0.
8
Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions.基于模拟的空间捕捉-再捕获模型验证:以山狮为例。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 19;14(4):e0215458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215458. eCollection 2019.
9
Roads do not increase carrion use by a vertebrate scavenging community.道路并不会增加脊椎动物食腐动物群落对腐肉的利用。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 5;8(1):16331. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34224-x.
10
Comparison of hoop-net trapping and visual surveys to monitor abundance of the Rio Grande cooter ().用于监测格兰德河龟()数量的围网诱捕法与目视调查法的比较。
PeerJ. 2018 May 11;6:e4677. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4677. eCollection 2018.
空间与封闭捕获-再捕获模型在塞内加尔西部白纹大羚羊(Taurotragus derbianus derbianus)已知种群中的应用。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 3;10(9):e0136525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136525. eCollection 2015.
4
Modeling and mapping the probability of occurrence of invasive wild pigs across the contiguous United States.模拟并绘制美国本土范围内入侵野猪出现概率的模型及分布图。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0133771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133771. eCollection 2015.
5
Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities.具有已知小型哺乳动物密度的空间捕获-再捕获模型性能
Ecol Appl. 2015 Apr;25(3):695-705. doi: 10.1890/14-0960.1.
6
Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies.用于捕获-再捕获研究的空间明确最大似然法。
Biometrics. 2008 Jun;64(2):377-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00927.x. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
7
Review of capture-recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling.适用于非侵入性基因采样的捕获-再捕获方法综述。
Mol Ecol. 2005 Nov;14(13):3909-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02717.x.
8
Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap.非侵入性基因采样:三思而后行。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Aug;14(8):323-327. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01637-7.