• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Aerosol furosemide for dyspnea: High-dose controlled delivery does not improve effectiveness.雾化吸入速尿治疗呼吸困难:高剂量控制给药并不能提高疗效。
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2018 Jan;247:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
2
Aerosol furosemide for dyspnea: Controlled delivery does not improve effectiveness.雾化吸入速尿治疗呼吸困难:控制给药并不能提高疗效。
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2018 Jan;247:146-155. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
3
Controlled Delivery of 80 mg Aerosol Furosemide Does Not Achieve Consistent Dyspnea Relief in Patients.80 毫克雾化呋塞米控释输送未能为患者实现一致的呼吸困难缓解。
Lung. 2020 Feb;198(1):113-120. doi: 10.1007/s00408-019-00292-7. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
4
Inhaled furosemide for relief of air hunger versus sense of breathing effort: a randomized controlled trial.吸入呋塞米缓解气促与呼吸费力感:一项随机对照试验。
Respir Res. 2018 Sep 20;19(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0886-9.
5
Nebulized medications for the treatment of dyspnea: a literature review.用于治疗呼吸困难的雾化药物:文献综述
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015 Feb;28(1):1-19. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2014.1136. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
6
Nebulized furosemide for the management of dyspnea: does the evidence support its use?雾化呋塞米用于治疗呼吸困难:证据支持其使用吗?
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Oct;36(4):424-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.10.017. Epub 2008 May 12.
7
Effect of inhaled furosemide on air hunger induced in healthy humans.吸入性速尿对健康人诱发的空气饥饿的影响。
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2007 Apr 16;156(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
8
The role of inhaled opioids and furosemide for the treatment of dyspnea.吸入性阿片类药物和呋塞米在治疗呼吸困难中的作用。
Respir Care. 2007 Jul;52(7):900-10.
9
Mechanisms of dyspnoea relief and improved exercise endurance after furosemide inhalation in COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入呋塞米后呼吸困难缓解及运动耐力改善的机制
Thorax. 2008 Jul;63(7):606-13. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.085993. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
10
The Effect of Aerosol Saline on Laboratory-Induced Dyspnea.雾化生理盐水对实验室诱发的呼吸困难的影响。
Lung. 2017 Feb;195(1):37-42. doi: 10.1007/s00408-016-9971-3. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficiency of Nebulizing Furosemide in the Treatment of Chronic Pulmonary Obstructive Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.雾化呋塞米治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效:一项临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Tanaffos. 2020 Dec;19(4):340-349.
2
Air Hunger: A Primal Sensation and a Primary Element of Dyspnea.气促感:一种原始感觉和呼吸困难的主要元素。
Compr Physiol. 2021 Feb 12;11(2):1449-1483. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c200001.
3
Is Inhaled Furosemide a Potential Therapeutic for COVID-19?吸入呋塞米治疗 COVID-19 有效吗?
Am J Med Sci. 2020 Sep;360(3):216-221. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.05.044. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
4
Controlled Delivery of 80 mg Aerosol Furosemide Does Not Achieve Consistent Dyspnea Relief in Patients.80 毫克雾化呋塞米控释输送未能为患者实现一致的呼吸困难缓解。
Lung. 2020 Feb;198(1):113-120. doi: 10.1007/s00408-019-00292-7. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
5
Development and Characterization of Eudragit-Based Electrospun Nanofibrous Mats and Their Formulation into Nanofiber Tablets for the Modified Release of Furosemide.基于Eudragit的电纺纳米纤维垫的研制与表征及其制成用于速尿缓释的纳米纤维片的制剂
Pharmaceutics. 2019 Sep 17;11(9):480. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11090480.
6
Inhaled furosemide for relief of air hunger versus sense of breathing effort: a randomized controlled trial.吸入呋塞米缓解气促与呼吸费力感:一项随机对照试验。
Respir Res. 2018 Sep 20;19(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0886-9.
7
Effect of Inhaled Nebulized Furosemide (40 and 120 mg) on Breathlessness during Exercise in the Presence of External Thoracic Restriction in Healthy Men.吸入雾化速尿(40毫克和120毫克)对健康男性在存在胸廓外部限制时运动期间呼吸困难的影响。
Front Physiol. 2018 Feb 12;9:86. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00086. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Aerosol furosemide for dyspnea: Controlled delivery does not improve effectiveness.雾化吸入速尿治疗呼吸困难:控制给药并不能提高疗效。
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2018 Jan;247:146-155. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
2
Placebo and Nocebo Effects: The Advantage of Measuring Expectations and Psychological Factors.安慰剂和反安慰剂效应:测量期望和心理因素的优势
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 6;8:308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00308. eCollection 2017.
3
The Effect of Aerosol Saline on Laboratory-Induced Dyspnea.雾化生理盐水对实验室诱发的呼吸困难的影响。
Lung. 2017 Feb;195(1):37-42. doi: 10.1007/s00408-016-9971-3. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
Increasing placebo responses over time in U.S. clinical trials of neuropathic pain.美国神经性疼痛临床试验中安慰剂反应随时间的增加。
Pain. 2015 Dec;156(12):2616-2626. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000333.
5
Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile: an instrument for clinical and laboratory research.多维呼吸困难量表:一种用于临床和实验室研究的工具。
Eur Respir J. 2015 Jun;45(6):1681-91. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00038914. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
6
Placebo group improvement in trials of pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorders: a multivariate meta-analysis examining change over time.安慰剂组在药物治疗酒精使用障碍试验中的改善:一个多元荟萃分析,考察随时间的变化。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Oct;33(5):649-57. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3182983e73.
7
Opposite responses to lidocaine between intrapulmonary mechanical and chemical sensors.肺内机械传感器和化学传感器对利多卡因的反应相反。
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009 Sep;297(3):R853-8. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00013.2009. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
8
The affective dimension of laboratory dyspnea: air hunger is more unpleasant than work/effort.实验室性呼吸困难的情感维度:空气饥饿比工作/用力更令人不适。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun 15;177(12):1384-90. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200711-1675OC. Epub 2008 Mar 27.
9
Mechanisms of dyspnoea relief and improved exercise endurance after furosemide inhalation in COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入呋塞米后呼吸困难缓解及运动耐力改善的机制
Thorax. 2008 Jul;63(7):606-13. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.085993. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
10
Effect of inhaled furosemide on air hunger induced in healthy humans.吸入性速尿对健康人诱发的空气饥饿的影响。
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2007 Apr 16;156(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Aug 28.

雾化吸入速尿治疗呼吸困难:高剂量控制给药并不能提高疗效。

Aerosol furosemide for dyspnea: High-dose controlled delivery does not improve effectiveness.

作者信息

Banzett Robert B, Schwartzstein Richard M, Lansing Robert W, O'Donnell Carl R

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

出版信息

Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2018 Jan;247:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.resp.2017.08.010
PMID:28843675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6358582/
Abstract

Published studies have shown great variability in response when aerosolized furosemide has been tested as a palliative treatment for dyspnea. We hypothesized that a higher furosemide dose with controlled aerosol administration would produce consistent dyspnea relief. We optimized deposition by controlling inspiratory flow (300-500mL/s) and tidal volume (15% predicted vital capacity) while delivering 3.4μm aerosol from either saline or 80mg of furosemide. We induced dyspnea in healthy subjects by varying inspired PCO while restricting minute ventilation. Subjects rated "Breathing Discomfort" on a Visual Analog Scale (BDVAS, 100% Full Scale≡intolerable). At the PET producing 60% BDVAS pre-treatment, furosemide produced a clinically meaningful reduction of BDVAS (i.e., >20% FS) in 5/11 subjects; saline reduced dyspnea in 3/11 subjects; neither treatment worsened dyspnea in any subject. Furosemide and saline treatment effects were not statistically different. There were no significant adverse events. Higher furosemide dose and controlled delivery did not improve consistency of treatment effect compared with prior studies.

摘要

已发表的研究表明,雾化呋塞米作为缓解呼吸困难的姑息治疗方法进行测试时,其反应存在很大差异。我们假设,更高剂量的呋塞米并采用可控的雾化给药方式会产生持续的呼吸困难缓解效果。我们通过控制吸气流量(300 - 500mL/s)和潮气量(预测肺活量的15%)来优化药物沉积,同时从盐水或80mg呋塞米中输送3.4μm的气雾剂。我们通过在限制分钟通气量的同时改变吸入的PCO₂来诱导健康受试者出现呼吸困难。受试者在视觉模拟量表(BDVAS,100%满量程≡无法忍受)上对“呼吸不适”进行评分。在PET时,治疗前BDVAS为60%,呋塞米使5/11的受试者的BDVAS出现了具有临床意义的降低(即>20%满量程);盐水使3/11的受试者的呼吸困难得到缓解;两种治疗方法均未使任何受试者的呼吸困难加重。呋塞米和盐水的治疗效果在统计学上没有差异。没有显著的不良事件。与先前的研究相比,更高剂量的呋塞米和可控给药并没有提高治疗效果的一致性。