Banzett Robert B, Schwartzstein Richard M, Lansing Robert W, O'Donnell Carl R
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2018 Jan;247:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
Published studies have shown great variability in response when aerosolized furosemide has been tested as a palliative treatment for dyspnea. We hypothesized that a higher furosemide dose with controlled aerosol administration would produce consistent dyspnea relief. We optimized deposition by controlling inspiratory flow (300-500mL/s) and tidal volume (15% predicted vital capacity) while delivering 3.4μm aerosol from either saline or 80mg of furosemide. We induced dyspnea in healthy subjects by varying inspired PCO while restricting minute ventilation. Subjects rated "Breathing Discomfort" on a Visual Analog Scale (BDVAS, 100% Full Scale≡intolerable). At the PET producing 60% BDVAS pre-treatment, furosemide produced a clinically meaningful reduction of BDVAS (i.e., >20% FS) in 5/11 subjects; saline reduced dyspnea in 3/11 subjects; neither treatment worsened dyspnea in any subject. Furosemide and saline treatment effects were not statistically different. There were no significant adverse events. Higher furosemide dose and controlled delivery did not improve consistency of treatment effect compared with prior studies.
已发表的研究表明,雾化呋塞米作为缓解呼吸困难的姑息治疗方法进行测试时,其反应存在很大差异。我们假设,更高剂量的呋塞米并采用可控的雾化给药方式会产生持续的呼吸困难缓解效果。我们通过控制吸气流量(300 - 500mL/s)和潮气量(预测肺活量的15%)来优化药物沉积,同时从盐水或80mg呋塞米中输送3.4μm的气雾剂。我们通过在限制分钟通气量的同时改变吸入的PCO₂来诱导健康受试者出现呼吸困难。受试者在视觉模拟量表(BDVAS,100%满量程≡无法忍受)上对“呼吸不适”进行评分。在PET时,治疗前BDVAS为60%,呋塞米使5/11的受试者的BDVAS出现了具有临床意义的降低(即>20%满量程);盐水使3/11的受试者的呼吸困难得到缓解;两种治疗方法均未使任何受试者的呼吸困难加重。呋塞米和盐水的治疗效果在统计学上没有差异。没有显著的不良事件。与先前的研究相比,更高剂量的呋塞米和可控给药并没有提高治疗效果的一致性。