Daney de Marcillac F, Pinton A, Guillaume A, Sagot P, Pirrello O, Rongieres C
Department of reproductive medicine, CMCO, 67130 Schiltigheim, France.
Department of reproductive medicine, CMCO, 67130 Schiltigheim, France.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 Oct;46(8):629-635. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
The principal outcome was to assess the ovarian response to controlled hyperstimulation during in vitro fertilization (IVF) with or without micro-injection (ICSI) in patients whom ovarian reserve testing revealed a discrepancy between the serum levels of FSH and AMH. The secondary outcome was to determine whether AMH and FSH profiles could predict the IVF/ICSI response.
This was a multicenter, retrospective study analysing all controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles with attempted fresh embryo transfer(s) carried out during IVF/ICSI treatment and in which the AMH level had been assayed between January 01, 2008 and December 31, 2011. This enabled us to form 2 control groups (NOR, normal ovarian reserve: normal AMH and FSH and DOR, diminished ovarian reserve: diminished AMH, increased FSH) and 2 study groups (DAMH: diminished AMH, normal FSH and NAMH: normal AMH, increased FSH). The principal assessment criterion was quantitative ovarian response to stimulation defined by the mean number of oocytes punctured, the secondary assessment criterion the qualitative response to stimulation defined by the pregnancy rate per cycle.
We were able to analyse 1803 stimulation cycles. The mean number of oocytes punctured was significantly reduced in the DAMH and DOR groups compared to the NAMH and NOR groups (5.2±3.9 and 4.1±3.3 vs. 11.5±7 and 9.5±5.6, respectively [P<0.01]). The pregnancy rate per initiated cycle was significantly reduced in the DAMH and DOR groups compared to the NAMH and NOR groups (20% and 24% vs. 32 and 35%, respectively [P<0.01]). Live birth rates did not differ between the groups however. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression revealed that AMH, FSH and age independently had an effect on the number of oocytes punctured, although the effect exerted by AMH seemed to be preponderant (OR: 2.75: 95%CI [2.39-3.19]). AMH appeared to be the sole factor independently predictive of pregnancy per cycle.
The serum AMH level appears to provide an additional item of discriminatory information, which should not be overlooked. Ovarian reserve work-up should include routine AMH assay.
主要结果是评估在体外受精(IVF)过程中,无论有无显微注射(ICSI),卵巢储备功能检测显示血清卵泡刺激素(FSH)水平与抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平存在差异的患者,其卵巢对控制性超促排卵的反应。次要结果是确定AMH和FSH水平能否预测IVF/ICSI的反应。
这是一项多中心回顾性研究,分析了2008年1月1日至2011年12月31日期间在IVF/ICSI治疗中进行新鲜胚胎移植尝试的所有控制性卵巢刺激周期,且这些周期均检测了AMH水平。这使我们能够形成2个对照组(NOR,正常卵巢储备:AMH和FSH正常;DOR,卵巢储备功能减退:AMH降低,FSH升高)和2个研究组(DAMH:AMH降低,FSH正常;NAMH:AMH正常,FSH升高)。主要评估标准是根据穿刺的卵母细胞平均数定义的卵巢对刺激的定量反应,次要评估标准是根据每个周期的妊娠率定义的对刺激的定性反应。
我们能够分析1803个刺激周期。与NAMH组和NOR组相比,DAMH组和DOR组穿刺的卵母细胞平均数显著降低(分别为5.2±3.9和4.1±3.3,而NAMH组和NOR组分别为11.5±7和9.5±5.6 [P<0.01])。与NAMH组和NOR组相比,DAMH组和DOR组每个启动周期妊娠率显著降低(分别为20%和24%,而NAMH组和NOR组分别为32%和35% [P<0.01])。然而,各组间活产率无差异。逻辑回归多因素分析显示,AMH、FSH和年龄独立影响穿刺的卵母细胞数量,尽管AMH的影响似乎占主导(比值比:2.75;95%置信区间[2.39 - 3.19])。AMH似乎是每个周期妊娠的唯一独立预测因素。
血清AMH水平似乎提供了一项不应被忽视的额外鉴别信息。卵巢储备功能检查应包括常规AMH检测。