Choi Yoonmi, Moon Eunsoo, Park Je Min, Lee Byung Dae, Lee Young Min, Jeong Hee Jeong, Chung Young In
Department of Psychiatry, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Department of Psychiatry, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
Psychiatry Investig. 2017 Jul;14(4):427-433. doi: 10.4306/pi.2017.14.4.427. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
The Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) is a globally recognized measure of stress coping methods. However, research into the applicability of the CISS in a Korean context is still in its infancy. The aim of this study is to assess and report the validity of the CISS in Korean adults for the first time.
Three hundred and two Korean adults who currently have no distressing problems requiring psychiatric treatment completed the Korean version of the CISS. Principal component analysis was used to extract factors in the process of exploratory factor analysis.
The result displayed a clear pattern matrix, and a high level of internal consistency was shown by Chronbach's alpha. The items classified under task-oriented and emotion-oriented coping presented adequate factorial validity, and only three items grouped under avoidance-oriented coping loaded poorly or loaded onto factors differing from the original.
These results seem to indicate that the CISS may indeed be both applicable and useful in gauging the coping styles of Korean adults. However, the ambiguous meanings of certain items under avoidance-oriented coping would require adjustment for the purposes of future study.
《应激情境应对量表》(CISS)是一种全球公认的应激应对方式测量工具。然而,关于CISS在韩国背景下适用性的研究仍处于起步阶段。本研究的目的是首次评估并报告CISS在韩国成年人中的效度。
302名目前没有需要精神科治疗的困扰问题的韩国成年人完成了韩文版的CISS。在探索性因素分析过程中,使用主成分分析来提取因素。
结果显示出清晰的模式矩阵,Chronbach's alpha显示出较高的内部一致性。归类为任务导向型和情绪导向型应对的项目呈现出足够的因素效度,而归类为回避导向型应对的项目中只有三个项目负荷较差或负荷到与原始因素不同的因素上。
这些结果似乎表明,CISS在衡量韩国成年人的应对方式方面可能确实既适用又有用。然而,为了未来研究的目的,回避导向型应对下某些项目的模糊含义需要调整。