Ferrero Marta, West Gillian, Vadillo Miguel A
Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London,United Kingdom.
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 28;12(8):e0183618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183618. eCollection 2017.
Over the last century, sporadic research has suggested that people whose hand, eye, foot, or ear dominances are not consistently right- or left-sided are at special risk of suffering academic difficulties. This phenomenon is known as crossed laterality. Although the bulk of this research dates from 1960's and 1970's, crossed laterality is becoming increasingly popular in the area of school education, driving the creation of several interventions aimed at restoring or consolidating lateral dominance. However, the available evidence is fragmentary. To determine the impact of crossed laterality on academic achievement and intelligence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles published since 1900. The inclusion criteria for the review required that studies used one or more lateral preference tasks for at least two specific parts of the body; they included a valid measure of crossed laterality; they measured the impact of crossed laterality on academic achievement or intelligence; and they included participants between 3 and 17 years old. The final sample included 26 articles that covered a total population of 3578 children aged 5 to 12. Taken collectively, the results of these studies do not support the claim that there is a reliable association between crossed laterality and either academic achievement or intelligence. Along with this, we detected important shortcomings in the literature, such as considerable heterogeneity among the variables used to measure laterality and among the tasks utilized to measure the outcomes. The educational implications of these results are discussed.
在过去的一个世纪里,零星的研究表明,那些手、眼、脚或耳朵的优势并非始终偏向右侧或左侧的人,在学业上有遭遇困难的特殊风险。这种现象被称为交叉偏侧性。尽管这项研究的大部分可追溯到20世纪60年代和70年代,但交叉偏侧性在学校教育领域正变得越来越普遍,催生了几种旨在恢复或巩固偏侧优势的干预措施。然而,现有的证据是零碎的。为了确定交叉偏侧性对学业成绩和智力的影响,我们对自1900年以来发表的文章进行了系统的综述和荟萃分析。该综述的纳入标准要求研究对身体的至少两个特定部位使用一个或多个偏侧偏好任务;它们包括交叉偏侧性的有效测量方法;它们测量交叉偏侧性对学业成绩或智力的影响;并且它们纳入了3至17岁的参与者。最终样本包括26篇文章,涵盖了总共3578名5至12岁的儿童。总体而言,这些研究的结果并不支持交叉偏侧性与学业成绩或智力之间存在可靠关联的说法。与此同时,我们在文献中发现了重要的缺陷,例如用于测量偏侧性的变量以及用于测量结果的任务之间存在相当大的异质性。我们讨论了这些结果的教育意义。