1Universidade do Estado de São Paulo,Faculdade de Saúde Pública,Departamento de Nutrição,Avenida Dr Arnaldo 715,2º andar,Cerqueira Cesar CEP 01246904,São Paulo,SP,Brazil.
3Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina,Departamento de Nutrição/NUPPRE - Comportamento Alimentar,Florianópolis,SC,Brazil.
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jan;21(1):218-229. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001999. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
The present paper aimed to identify the stakeholders, as well as their arguments and recommendations, in the debate on the application of a food processing-based classification system to the new Brazilian Food Guide.
Qualitative approach; an analysis was made of documents resulting from the consultation conducted for the development of the new Brazilian Food Guide, which uses the NOVA classification for its dietary recommendations. A thematic matrix was constructed and the resulting themes represented the main points for discussion raised during the consultation.
Brazil.
Actors from academia, government and associations/unions/professional bodies/organizations related to the area of nutrition and food security; non-profit institutions linked to consumer interests and civil society organizations; organizations, associations and food unions linked to the food industry; and individuals.
Four themes were identified: (i) conflicting paradigms; (ii) different perceptions about the role and need of individuals; (iii) we want more from the new food guide; and (iv) a sustainable guide.
There was extensive participation from different sectors of society. The debate generated by the consultation revealed two main conflicting opinions: a view aligned with the interests of the food industry and a view of healthy eating which serves the interests of the population. The first group was against the adoption of a food processing-based classification system in a public policy such as the new Brazilian Food Guide. The second group, although mostly agreeing with the new food guide, argued that it failed to address some important issues related to the food and nutrition agenda in Brazil.
本文旨在确定新巴西食品指南应用基于食品加工分类系统的争论中的利益相关者,以及他们的论点和建议。
定性方法;对新巴西食品指南制定过程中咨询产生的文件进行了分析,该指南使用 NOVA 分类法来提出饮食建议。构建了一个主题矩阵,生成的主题代表了咨询过程中提出的主要讨论点。
巴西。
来自学术界、政府和与营养和食品安全相关的协会/工会/专业机构/组织的行为者;与消费者利益相关的非营利机构和民间社会组织;与食品工业相关的组织、协会和食品联盟;以及个人。
确定了四个主题:(i)冲突的范式;(ii)对个人角色和需求的不同看法;(iii)我们希望新食品指南提供更多内容;以及(iv)可持续性指南。
社会各界广泛参与。咨询引发的辩论揭示了两种主要的冲突观点:一种观点与食品工业的利益一致,另一种观点是健康饮食符合人口利益。第一组反对在新巴西食品指南等公共政策中采用基于食品加工的分类系统。第二组虽然大多同意新的食品指南,但认为它未能解决巴西食品和营养议程的一些重要问题。