Suppr超能文献

免疫分析中的干扰因素研究。

The investigation of interferences in immunoassay.

作者信息

Ward Greg, Simpson Aaron, Boscato Lyn, Hickman Peter E

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Bowen Hills, QLD 4006, Australia.

Department of Chemical Pathology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT 2605, Australia; Australian National University Medical School, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Biochem. 2017 Dec;50(18):1306-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Aug 26.

Abstract

Immunoassay procedures have a wide application in clinical medicine and as such are used throughout clinical biochemistry laboratories both for urgent and routine testing. Clinicians and laboratory personnel are often presented with immunoassay results which are inconsistent with clinical findings. Without a high index of suspicion interferences will often not be suspected. Artifactual results can be due to a range of interferences in immunoassays which can include cross reacting substances, heterophile antibodies, autoantibodies and the high dose hook effect. Further, pre-analytical aspects and certain disease states can influence the potential for interference in immunoassays. Practical solutions for investigation of artifactual results in the setting of the routine clinical laboratory are provided.

摘要

免疫测定程序在临床医学中有着广泛应用,因此在整个临床生物化学实验室中都用于紧急和常规检测。临床医生和实验室工作人员常常会遇到与临床发现不一致的免疫测定结果。如果没有高度的怀疑指数,干扰往往不会被察觉。人为造成的结果可能是由于免疫测定中的一系列干扰因素,包括交叉反应物质、嗜异性抗体、自身抗体以及高剂量钩状效应。此外,分析前因素和某些疾病状态会影响免疫测定中出现干扰的可能性。本文提供了在常规临床实验室环境中调查人为造成结果的实际解决方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验