Demarzo Marcelo, Montero-Marin Jesus, Puebla-Guedea Marta, Navarro-Gil Mayte, Herrera-Mercadal Paola, Moreno-González Sergio, Calvo-Carrión Sandra, Bafaluy-Franch Laura, Garcia-Campayo Javier
Mente Aberta - Brazilian Center for Mindfulness and Health Promotion, Universidade Federal de Sao PauloSao Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital Israelita Albert EinsteinSao Paulo, Brazil.
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 8;8:1343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01343. eCollection 2017.
Many attempts have been made to abbreviate mindfulness programmes in order to make them more accessible for general and clinical populations while maintaining their therapeutic components and efficacy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of an 8-week mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) programme and a 4-week abbreviated version for the improvement of well-being in a non-clinical population. A quasi-experimental, controlled, pilot study was conducted with pre-post and 6-month follow-up measurements and three study conditions (8- and 4-session MBI programmes and a matched no-treatment control group, with a sample of 48, 46, and 47 participants in each condition, respectively). Undergraduate students were recruited, and mindfulness, positive and negative affect, self-compassion, resilience, anxiety, and depression were assessed. Mixed-effects multi-level analyses for repeated measures were performed. The intervention groups showed significant improvements compared to controls in mindfulness and positive affect at the 2- and 6-month follow-ups, with no differences between 8- vs. 4-session programmes. The only difference between the abbreviated MBI vs. the standard MBI was found in self-kindness at 6 months, favoring the standard MBI. There were marginal differences in anxiety between the controls vs. the abbreviated MBI, but there were differences between the controls vs. the standard MBI at 2- and 6-months, with higher levels in the controls. There were no differences in depression between the controls vs. the abbreviated MBI, but differences were found between the controls vs. the standard MBI at 2- and 6-months, favoring the standard MBI. There were no differences with regard to negative affect and resilience. To our knowledge, this is the first study to directly investigate the efficacy of a standard 8-week MBI and a 4-week abbreviated protocol in the same population. Based on our findings, both programmes performed better than controls, with similar effect size (ES). The efficacy of abbreviated mindfulness programmes may be similar to that of a standard MBI programme, making them potentially more accessible for a larger number of populations. Nevertheless, further studies with more powerful designs to compare the non-inferiority of the abbreviated protocol and addressing clinical populations are warranted. NCT02643927.
为了让正念训练项目更容易被普通人群和临床人群接受,同时保持其治疗成分和效果,人们进行了许多尝试来缩短这些项目。本研究的目的是评估一项为期8周的基于正念的干预(MBI)项目和一个为期4周的简化版本对改善非临床人群幸福感的效果。进行了一项准实验性、对照性的试点研究,包括前后测量和6个月的随访测量,并设置了三个研究条件(8节和4节的MBI项目以及一个匹配的无治疗对照组,每组分别有48、46和47名参与者)。招募了本科生,并对正念、积极和消极情绪、自我同情、复原力、焦虑和抑郁进行了评估。对重复测量进行了混合效应多层次分析。干预组在2个月和6个月的随访中,与对照组相比,在正念和积极情绪方面有显著改善,8节和4节项目之间没有差异。简化版MBI与标准MBI之间的唯一差异在6个月时体现在自我友善方面,标准MBI更具优势。对照组与简化版MBI在焦虑方面存在微小差异,但在2个月和6个月时,对照组与标准MBI之间存在差异,对照组的焦虑水平更高。对照组与简化版MBI在抑郁方面没有差异,但在2个月和6个月时,对照组与标准MBI之间存在差异,标准MBI更具优势。在消极情绪和复原力方面没有差异。据我们所知,这是第一项在同一人群中直接研究标准8周MBI和4周简化方案效果的研究。根据我们的研究结果,两个项目都比对照组表现更好,效果大小(ES)相似。简化版正念训练项目的效果可能与标准MBI项目相似,这使得它们可能更容易被更多人群接受。然而,需要进一步开展设计更强大的研究,以比较简化方案的非劣效性并针对临床人群进行研究。NCT02643927。