Sharma Gulshan, Mahler Donald A, Mayorga Valerie M, Deering Kathleen L, Harshaw Oing, Ganapathy Vaidyanathan
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire and Valley Regional Hospital, Claremont, New Hampshire.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2017 Jul 15;4(3):217-224. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.4.3.2017.0183.
Low peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) (<60 L/min) among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may result in ineffective medication inhalation, leading to poor bronchodilation. The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate the prevalence of low PIFR at the time of discharge from a COPD-related hospitalization and to examine the real-world treatment patterns and rehospitalizations by PIFR. Patients at 7 sites in the United States were screened for enrollment at hospital discharge. PIFR was measured using the InCheck DIAL to simulate resistance of the DISKUS® dry powder inhaler (DPI). An equal number of patients were enrolled into low PIFR (<60 L/min) or normal PIFR (≥60 L/min) cohorts. Demographics, COPD-related clinical characteristics, health status, treatment and rehospitalization data were collected. Mean PIFR was 71±22.12 L/min among 268 screened patients; 31.7% (n=85) of patients had low PIFR. Among all enrolled patients (n=170), the low PIFR cohort was older (66.2±10.04 years versus 62.1±9.41 years, =0.006) and more likely to be female (61.2% versus 42.4%, =0.014). There was an increase in DPI use at discharge, compared with admission, in the low PIFR cohort (62.4% versus 70.6%, p=0.020). The incidences of all-cause rehospitalization up to 180 days were similar between the low and normal PIFR cohorts. At discharge following hospitalization for an exacerbation of COPD, approximately one-third of patients had a PIFR <60 L/min. More patients with a low PIFR were discharged with a DPI medication compared with use at admission. There was no difference in the rehospitalization rates by PIFR.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的低吸气峰流速(PIFR)(<60升/分钟)可能导致药物吸入无效,从而导致支气管扩张不佳。本分析的目的是评估与COPD相关住院出院时低PIFR的患病率,并按PIFR检查实际治疗模式和再住院情况。在美国7个地点的患者在出院时进行筛选以纳入研究。使用InCheck DIAL测量PIFR,以模拟DISKUS®干粉吸入器(DPI)的阻力。将同等数量的患者纳入低PIFR(<60升/分钟)或正常PIFR(≥60升/分钟)队列。收集人口统计学、COPD相关临床特征、健康状况、治疗和再住院数据。在268名筛查患者中,平均PIFR为71±22.12升/分钟;31.7%(n = 八十五)的患者PIFR较低。在所有纳入的患者(n = 一百七十)中,低PIFR队列年龄较大(66.2±10.04岁对62.1±9.41岁,=0.006),女性比例更高(61.2%对42.4%,=0.014)。与入院时相比,低PIFR队列出院时DPI的使用有所增加(62.4%对70.6%,p = 0.020)。低PIFR和正常PIFR队列中180天内全因再住院的发生率相似。在因COPD加重住院后的出院时,约三分之一的患者PIFR<60升/分钟。与入院时相比,更多PIFR低的患者出院时使用DPI药物。按PIFR划分的再住院率没有差异。