Appachi Swathi, Specht Jessica L, Raol Nikhila, Lieu Judith E C, Cohen Michael S, Dedhia Kavita, Anne Samantha
1 Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
2 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Oct;157(4):565-571. doi: 10.1177/0194599817726757. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
Objective Options for management of unilateral hearing loss (UHL) in children include conventional hearing aids, bone-conduction hearing devices, contralateral routing of signal (CROS) aids, and frequency-modulating (FM) systems. The objective of this study was to systematically review the current literature to characterize auditory outcomes of hearing rehabilitation options in UHL. Data Sources PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 2016. Manual searches of bibliographies were also performed. Review Methods Studies analyzing auditory outcomes of hearing amplification in children with UHL were included. Outcome measures included functional and objective auditory results. Two independent reviewers evaluated each abstract and article. Results Of the 249 articles identified, 12 met inclusion criteria. Seven articles solely focused on outcomes with bone-conduction hearing devices. Outcomes favored improved pure-tone averages, speech recognition thresholds, and sound localization in implanted patients. Five studies focused on FM systems, conventional hearing aids, or CROS hearing aids. Limited data are available but suggest a trend toward improvement in speech perception with hearing aids. FM systems were shown to have the most benefit for speech recognition in noise. Studies evaluating CROS hearing aids demonstrated variable outcomes. Conclusions Data evaluating functional and objective auditory measures following hearing amplification in children with UHL are limited. Most studies do suggest improvement in speech perception, speech recognition in noise, and sound localization with a hearing rehabilitation device.
目的 儿童单侧听力损失(UHL)的管理方案包括传统助听器、骨传导听力设备、信号对侧路由(CROS)助听器和调频(FM)系统。本研究的目的是系统回顾当前文献,以描述UHL听力康复方案的听觉效果。 数据来源 检索了从创刊至2016年1月的PubMed、EMBASE、Medline、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆。还对手稿参考文献进行了手工检索。 综述方法 纳入分析UHL儿童听力放大听觉效果的研究。结果测量包括功能性和客观性听觉结果。两名独立评审员评估了每篇摘要和文章。 结果 在识别出的249篇文章中,12篇符合纳入标准。7篇文章仅关注骨传导听力设备的效果。结果显示植入患者的纯音平均值、言语识别阈值和声音定位有所改善。5项研究关注FM系统、传统助听器或CROS助听器。现有数据有限,但提示使用助听器后言语感知有改善趋势。FM系统在噪声环境下的言语识别中显示出最大益处。评估CROS助听器的研究结果不一。 结论 评估UHL儿童听力放大后功能性和客观性听觉测量的资料有限。大多数研究确实提示使用听力康复设备后言语感知、噪声环境下的言语识别和声音定位有所改善。