J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(4):287-294. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a38867.
To evaluate in a randomized clinical evaluation the 3-year clinical durability of a one-step universal adhesive and compare it intraindividually with a 2-step self-etch adhesive in Class II restorations.
Each of 57 participants (mean age 58.3 years) received at least two extended Class II restorations that were as similar as possible. The cavities in each of the 60 individual pairs of cavities were randomly distributed to the 1-step universal adhesive (All-Bond Universal: AU) and the control 2-step self-etch adhesive (Optibond XTR: OX). A low shrinkage composite (Aelite LS) was used for all restorations, which were evaluated using slightly modified USPHS criteria at baseline and 1, 2, and 3 years.
114 Class II restorations were evaluated at three years. Eight restorations, 3 AU and 5 OX, failed during the follow-up, resulting in 94.7% (AU) and 91.2% (OX) success rates (p > 0.05). Annual failure rates were 1.8% and 2.9%, respectively.The main reason for failure was composite fracture.
Class II composite restorations placed with a 1-step universal adhesive showed good short-term efficacy.
通过一项随机临床试验评估一种一步通用型粘结剂的 3 年临床耐久性,并与两步自酸蚀粘结剂在 II 类修复体中进行个体内比较。
57 名参与者(平均年龄 58.3 岁)中的每个人至少接受了两个尽可能相似的扩展 II 类修复体。每个 60 个个体对窝洞中的窝洞随机分配给一步通用型粘结剂(All-Bond Universal:AU)和对照组两步自酸蚀粘结剂(Optibond XTR:OX)。所有修复体均使用低聚合收缩复合树脂(Aelite LS),并在基线、1 年、2 年和 3 年使用稍作修改的 USPHS 标准进行评估。
在 3 年时评估了 114 个 II 类修复体。在随访期间有 8 个修复体,3 个 AU 和 5 个 OX 失败,成功率分别为 94.7%(AU)和 91.2%(OX)(p>0.05)。年失败率分别为 1.8%和 2.9%。失败的主要原因是复合树脂断裂。
使用一步通用型粘结剂进行 II 类复合树脂修复体显示出良好的短期疗效。