• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国科研成果中的跨国研究网络。对健康产业相关领域的调查。

Transnational Research Networks in Chinese Scientific Production. An Investigation on Health-Industry Related Sectors.

作者信息

Rubini Lauretta, Pollio Chiara, Di Tommaso Marco R

机构信息

Department of Economics and Management, University of Ferrara, Via Voltapaletto, 11-44121 Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 29;14(9):975. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14090975.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph14090975
PMID:28850072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5615512/
Abstract

Transnational research networks (TRN) are becoming increasingly complex. Such complexity may have both positive and negative effects on the quality of research. Our work studies the evolution over time of Chinese TRN and the role of complexity on the quality of Chinese research, given the leading role this country has recently acquired in international science. We focus on the fields of geriatrics and gerontology. We build an original dataset of all scientific publications of China in these areas in 2009, 2012 and 2015, starting from the ISI Web of Knowledge (ISI WoK) database. Using Social Network Analysis (SNA), we analyze the change in scientific network structure across time. Second, we design indices to control for the different aspects of networks complexity (number of authors, country heterogeneity and institutional heterogeneity) and we perform negative binomial regressions to identify the main determinants of research quality. Our analysis shows that research networks in the field of geriatrics and gerontology have gradually become wider in terms of countries and have become more balanced. Furthermore, our results identify that different forms of complexity have different impacts on quality, including a reciprocal moderating effect. In particular, according to our analysis, research quality benefits from complex research networks both in terms of countries and of types of institutions involved, but that such networks should be "compact" in terms of number of authors. Eventually, we suggest that complexity should be carefully taken into account when designing policies aimed at enhancing the quality of research.

摘要

跨国研究网络(TRN)正变得日益复杂。这种复杂性可能对研究质量产生积极和消极的影响。鉴于中国最近在国际科学领域占据主导地位,我们的研究考察了中国跨国研究网络随时间的演变以及复杂性对中国研究质量的作用。我们聚焦于老年医学和老年学领域。我们从ISI科学网数据库(ISI WoK)入手,构建了一个包含2009年、2012年和2015年中国在这些领域所有科学出版物的原始数据集。利用社会网络分析(SNA),我们分析了科学网络结构随时间的变化。其次,我们设计指标来控制网络复杂性的不同方面(作者数量、国家异质性和机构异质性),并进行负二项回归以确定研究质量的主要决定因素。我们的分析表明,老年医学和老年学领域的研究网络在国家层面上逐渐变得更广泛,且更加平衡。此外,我们的结果表明,不同形式的复杂性对质量有不同影响,包括一种相互调节效应。特别是,根据我们的分析,研究质量在涉及的国家和机构类型方面都受益于复杂的研究网络,但这种网络在作者数量方面应该是“紧凑的”。最后,我们建议在制定旨在提高研究质量的政策时,应仔细考虑复杂性因素。

相似文献

1
Transnational Research Networks in Chinese Scientific Production. An Investigation on Health-Industry Related Sectors.中国科研成果中的跨国研究网络。对健康产业相关领域的调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 29;14(9):975. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14090975.
2
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
3
Where does research occur in geriatrics and gerontology?老年医学和老年学的研究在哪里进行?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jun;53(6):1058-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53311.x.
4
Increasing contribution of China in modern biomedical research. Statistical data from ISI Web of Knowledge.中国对现代生物医学研究的贡献不断增加。来自 ISI Web of Knowledge 的统计数据。
Med Sci Monit. 2009 Dec;15(12):SR15-21.
5
An international model for geriatrics program development in China: the Johns Hopkins-Peking Union Medical College experience.中国老年医学项目发展的国际模式:约翰霍普金斯大学-北京协和医学院的经验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jul;58(7):1376-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02927.x. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
6
Chinese villages and their sustainable future: the European Union-China-Research Project "SUCCESS".中国乡村及其可持续未来:欧盟-中国研究项目“SUCCESS”
J Environ Manage. 2008 Apr;87(2):204-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
7
International publication trends and collaboration performance of China in healthcare science and services research.中国在医疗科学与服务研究方面的国际出版趋势及合作表现
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016 Jan 29;5:1. doi: 10.1186/s13584-016-0061-z. eCollection 2016.
8
Evolution of coauthorship networks: worldwide scientific production on leishmaniasis.合作网络的演变:全球范围内关于利什曼病的科学研究成果。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2013 Nov-Dec;46(6):719-27. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0207-2013.
9
The growth of gerontology and geriatrics in Mexico: Past, present, and future.墨西哥老年学与老年医学的发展:过去、现在与未来。
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2017 Jan-Mar;38(1):76-91. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2016.1247068. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
10
[Scientific production in clinical medicine and international collaboration networks in South American countries].[南美洲国家临床医学的科研产出与国际合作网络]
Rev Med Chil. 2012 Apr;140(4):466-75. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872012000400007.

引用本文的文献

1
Restructuring the Production of Medicines: An Investigation on the Pharmaceutical Sector in China and the Role of Mergers and Acquisitions.药品生产结构调整:对中国制药行业及并购作用的调查
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 5;14(10):1179. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101179.

本文引用的文献

1
Can China afford rapid aging?中国能承受快速老龄化吗?
Springerplus. 2016 Jul 18;5(1):1107. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2778-0. eCollection 2016.
2
mHealth For Aging China: Opportunities and Challenges.中国老龄化背景下的移动健康:机遇与挑战
Aging Dis. 2016 Jan 2;7(1):53-67. doi: 10.14336/AD.2015.1011. eCollection 2016 Jan.
3
Collaborations: The rise of research networks.合作:研究网络的兴起。
Nature. 2012 Oct 18;490(7420):335-6. doi: 10.1038/490335a.
4
China: awakening giant developing solutions to population aging.中国:觉醒的巨人正在为人口老龄化问题寻找解决方案。
Gerontologist. 2012 Oct;52(5):589-96. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns105. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
5
Bibliometric indicators: quality measurements of scientific publication.文献计量指标:科学出版物的质量衡量标准。
Radiology. 2010 May;255(2):342-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09090626.
6
Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities.文献计量学方法:陷阱与可能性
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005 Nov;97(5):261-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x.
7
Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?影响因子:衡量期刊质量的有效指标?
J Med Libr Assoc. 2003 Jan;91(1):42-6.
8
Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality.引文与期刊影响因子:研究质量的可疑指标。
Allergy. 1997 Nov;52(11):1050-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb00175.x.
9
Bibliometrics and evaluation of research performance.文献计量学与研究绩效评估
Ann Med. 1990 Jun;22(3):145-50. doi: 10.3109/07853899009147259.