• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“共度时光”能否提高互动质量并减轻压力?一项采用混合方法的多地点精神科住院护理干预研究方案。

Does 'Time Together' increase quality of interaction and decrease stress? A study protocol of a multisite nursing intervention in psychiatric inpatient care, using a mixed method approach.

作者信息

Molin Jenny, Lindgren Britt-Marie, Graneheim Ulla Hällgren, Ringnér Anders

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Department of Paediatrics, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e015677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015677.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015677
PMID:28851774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5724076/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite the long-known significance of the nurse-patient relationship, research in psychiatric inpatient care still reports unfulfilled expectations of, and difficulties in, interactions and relationships between patients and staff. Interventions that create structures to allow quality interactions between patients and staff are needed to solve these problems. The aim of this project is to test effects of the nursing intervention Time Together and to evaluate the intervention process.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a multisite study with a single-system experimental design using frequent measures. The primary outcomes are quality interactions for patients and perceived stress for staff. Secondary outcomes are levels of symptoms of anxiety and depression for patients and stress of conscience for staff. A process evaluation is performed to describe contextual factors and experiences. Data are collected using questionnaires, participant observations and semistructured interviews. For analysis of quantitative data, both visual and statistical methods will be used. Qualitative data will be analysed using qualitative content analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was granted by the Ethical Review Board in the region (Dnr 2016/339-31). The findings will contribute to the development of nursing interventions in general, but more specifically to the development of the intervention. This is relevant both nationally and internationally as similar interventions are needed but sparse. The findings will be disseminated through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02981563.

摘要

引言

尽管医患关系的重要性早已为人所知,但精神病住院护理方面的研究仍报告称,患者与医护人员之间的互动和关系存在期望未达成以及困难等问题。需要采取干预措施来构建结构,以实现患者与医护人员之间的高质量互动,从而解决这些问题。本项目的目的是测试护理干预“共度时光”的效果,并评估干预过程。

方法与分析

这是一项采用单系统实验设计并进行频繁测量的多地点研究。主要结局指标是患者的高质量互动以及医护人员的感知压力。次要结局指标是患者的焦虑和抑郁症状水平以及医护人员的良心压力。进行过程评估以描述背景因素和经历。使用问卷调查、参与观察和半结构化访谈收集数据。对于定量数据的分析,将采用视觉和统计方法。定性数据将采用定性内容分析法进行分析。

伦理与传播

该研究已获得该地区伦理审查委员会的伦理批准(编号2016/339 - 31)。研究结果将有助于总体护理干预措施的发展,但更具体地有助于该干预措施的发展。这在国内和国际上都具有相关性,因为需要类似的干预措施,但此类措施较为稀少。研究结果将通过会议报告和同行评审出版物进行传播。

试验注册号

NCT02981563。

相似文献

1
Does 'Time Together' increase quality of interaction and decrease stress? A study protocol of a multisite nursing intervention in psychiatric inpatient care, using a mixed method approach.“共度时光”能否提高互动质量并减轻压力?一项采用混合方法的多地点精神科住院护理干预研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e015677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015677.
2
Does a new spatial design in psychiatric inpatient care influence patients' and staff's perception of their care/working environment? A study protocol of a pilot study using a single-system experimental design.精神科住院护理中的新空间设计会影响患者和工作人员对其护理/工作环境的认知吗?一项采用单系统实验设计的试点研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Dec 26;4:191. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0383-4. eCollection 2018.
3
Time Together: A nursing intervention in psychiatric inpatient care: Feasibility and effects.共同时光:精神科住院护理中的护理干预:可行性和效果。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Dec;27(6):1698-1708. doi: 10.1111/inm.12468. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
4
Time Together as an arena for mental health nursing - staff experiences of introducing and participating in a nursing intervention in psychiatric inpatient care.共同的时间——精神科护理的舞台 - 工作人员在精神科住院护理中引入和参与护理干预的体验。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Dec;29(6):1192-1201. doi: 10.1111/inm.12759. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
5
Patient-reported outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship in psychiatric inpatient hospitals: A multicentred descriptive cross-sectional study.精神科住院医院中护患关系的患者报告结局:一项多中心描述性横断面研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Jun;30(3):568-579. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12895. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
6
The therapeutic role of mental health nurses in psychiatric intensive care: A mixed-methods investigation in an inner-city mental health service.心理健康护士在精神科重症监护中的治疗作用:对市中心心理健康服务机构的一项混合方法调查。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Sep;24(7):491-502. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12389. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
7
Managing and caring for distressed and disturbed service users: the thoughts and feelings experienced by a sample of English mental health nurses.管理和照顾痛苦不安的服务使用者:一组英国精神科护士的所思所感。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Jun;22(5):289-97. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12199. Epub 2015 May 6.
8
Nursing documentation in inpatient psychiatry: The relevance of nurse-patient interactions in progress notes-A focus group study with mental health staff.住院精神病学中的护理记录:病程记录中护患互动的相关性——一项针对精神卫生工作人员的焦点小组研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(3-4):e611-e622. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14108. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
9
Capturing the Interpersonal Process of Psychiatric Nurses: A Model for Engagement.捕捉精神科护士的人际过程:一种参与模式。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Dec;31(6):634-640. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
10
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient perspectives on, and effects of, medication management in geriatric fallers (the EMMA study): protocol for a mixed-methods pre-post study.患者对老年跌倒者药物管理的看法及其影响(EMMA 研究):一项混合方法前后研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 22;13(2):e066666. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066666.
2
Developing a theory-informed complex intervention to improve nurse-patient therapeutic engagement employing Experience-based Co-design and the Behaviour Change Wheel: an acute mental health ward case study.运用基于经验的协同设计和行为改变轮开发理论指导的复杂干预措施,以改善护士-患者治疗性接触:一个急性心理健康病房案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 13;11(5):e047114. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047114.

本文引用的文献

1
A feasibility study comparing UK older adult mental health inpatient wards which use protected engagement time with other wards which do not: study protocol.一项可行性研究,比较英国使用受保护参与时间的老年成人心理健康住院病房与其他未使用该时间的病房:研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Jan 29;2:7. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0049-z. eCollection 2016.
2
From ideals to resignation - interprofessional teams perspectives on everyday life processes in psychiatric inpatient care.从理想状态到无奈放弃——跨专业团队对精神科住院护理日常生活流程的看法
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Nov;23(9-10):595-604. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12349. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
3
Taking personal responsibility: Nurses' and assistant nurses' experiences of good nursing practice in psychiatric inpatient care.承担个人责任:精神科住院护理中护士和助理护士良好护理实践的体验。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Oct;25(5):434-43. doi: 10.1111/inm.12230. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
4
Quality of interactions influences everyday life in psychiatric inpatient care--patients' perspectives.互动质量影响精神科住院护理中的日常生活——患者视角
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Jan 22;11:29897. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.29897. eCollection 2016.
5
Engagement as an Element of Safe Inpatient Psychiatric Environments.参与作为安全住院精神科环境的一个要素。
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2015 May-Jun;21(3):181-90. doi: 10.1177/1078390315593107.
6
What keeps nurses busy in the mental health setting?在心理健康环境中,是什么让护士们忙碌?
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Aug;22(6):449-56. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12173. Epub 2015 May 4.
7
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
8
Therapeutic relationships and involuntary treatment orders: service users' interactions with health-care professionals on the ward.治疗关系与非自愿治疗令:服务使用者在病房与医护人员的互动
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Apr;24(2):181-9. doi: 10.1111/inm.12121. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
9
A self-destructive care: self-reports of people who experienced coercive measures and their suggestions for alternatives.一种自我毁灭的照料:经历强制措施者的自我报告及其对替代措施的建议。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Feb;36(2):96-103. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2014.951134.
10
Features of everyday life in psychiatric inpatient care for self-harming: an observational study of six women.精神科住院治疗中自伤患者的日常生活特征:对六名女性的观察性研究
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Feb;36(2):82-8. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2014.941077.