Suppr超能文献

比较阴道微生物群采样技术:细胞刷与拭子。

Comparison of vaginal microbiota sampling techniques: cytobrush versus swab.

机构信息

Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology - West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, W2 1NY, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 29;7(1):9802. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09844-4.

Abstract

Evidence suggests the vaginal microbiota (VM) may influence risk of persistent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical carcinogenesis. Established cytology biobanks, typically collected with a cytobrush, constitute a unique resource to study such associations longitudinally. It is plausible that compared to rayon swabs; the most commonly used sampling devices, cytobrushes may disrupt biofilms leading to variation in VM composition. Cervico-vaginal samples were collected with cytobrush and rayon swabs from 30 women with high-grade cervical precancer. Quantitative PCR was used to compare bacterial load and Illumina MiSeq sequencing of the V1-V3 regions of the 16S rRNA gene used to compare VM composition. Cytobrushes collected a higher total bacterial load. Relative abundance of bacterial species was highly comparable between sampling devices (R = 0.993). However, in women with a Lactobacillus-depleted, high-diversity VM, significantly less correlation in relative species abundance was observed between devices when compared to those with a Lactobacillus species-dominant VM (p = 0.0049). Cytobrush and swab sampling provide a comparable VM composition. In a small proportion of cases the cytobrush was able to detect underlying high-diversity community structure, not realized with swab sampling. This study highlights the need to consider sampling devices as potential confounders when comparing multiple studies and datasets.

摘要

有证据表明,阴道微生物群(VM)可能会影响持续性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染和宫颈癌的发生风险。已建立的细胞学生物库通常使用细胞刷收集,是一个独特的资源,可用于纵向研究这些关联。与最常用的采样设备——人造纤维拭子相比,细胞刷可能会破坏生物膜,从而导致 VM 组成的变化,这是合理的。从 30 名患有高级别宫颈癌前病变的女性中使用细胞刷和人造纤维拭子收集宫颈阴道样本。使用定量 PCR 比较细菌负荷,使用 Illumina MiSeq 对 16S rRNA 基因的 V1-V3 区进行测序,以比较 VM 组成。细胞刷收集的总细菌负荷更高。两种采样设备之间细菌种类的相对丰度高度可比(R = 0.993)。然而,在乳酸杆菌耗竭、高多样性 VM 的女性中,与乳酸杆菌主导 VM 的女性相比,两种设备之间的相对物种丰度相关性明显较低(p = 0.0049)。细胞刷和拭子采样提供了可比的 VM 组成。在一小部分情况下,细胞刷能够检测到潜在的高多样性群落结构,而拭子采样则无法实现。这项研究强调了在比较多个研究和数据集时,需要将采样设备视为潜在的混杂因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2921/5575119/290d7d106ee3/41598_2017_9844_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验