Mall Anjali Sunil Kumar, Bhagyalaxmi Aroor
Department of Community Medicine, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Indian J Community Med. 2017 Jul-Sep;42(3):143-146. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_25_16.
Tobacco use among adolescence is one of the important preventable causes of death as well as a leading public health problem all over the world. The present study was conducted with the objective of studying the effect of peer-led interventions on tobacco use among adolescents.
Twenty schools were randomly selected and ten schools each were identified as cluster for intervention and control groups. A total of 402 students in intervention group and 422 in control group were studied.
About 48% and 41% of adolescents were consuming smokeless tobacco in any form in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Prevalence of consumption of smokeless tobacco was significantly high among boys as compared to girls. Pan masala was the most common form of consumption. After conducting A Stop Smoking in School Trial-like peer-led intervention, a significant reduction in tobacco consumption of any form was observed in the intervention group (48%-36%) during the follow-up ( = 3.2, < 0.01). A significant reduction in exposure to passive smoking in the intervention group (32%-29%) was also observed. All the students smoking initially had stopped smoking at the end of the follow-up in both the groups.
It was found that peer-led intervention was effective in reducing the consumption of smokeless tobacco in any form. The rate of reduction was more in the first follow-up as compared to the end of the intervention. Sustained intervention in the form of retraining is needed for the long-term effect.
青少年吸烟是重要的可预防死亡原因之一,也是全球主要的公共卫生问题。本研究旨在探讨同伴主导干预对青少年吸烟行为的影响。
随机选取20所学校,将其中10所学校分为干预组,另外10所学校作为对照组。干预组共402名学生,对照组共422名学生。
干预组和对照组中分别约有48%和41%的青少年以任何形式吸食无烟烟草。与女孩相比,男孩中无烟烟草的消费率显著更高。嚼烟是最常见的消费形式。在开展类似学校戒烟试验的同伴主导干预后,随访期间干预组中任何形式的烟草消费均显著减少(从48%降至36%)( = 3.2, < 0.01)。干预组中被动吸烟暴露也显著减少(从32%降至29%)。两组中所有最初吸烟的学生在随访结束时均已戒烟。
发现同伴主导干预在减少任何形式的无烟烟草消费方面有效。与干预结束时相比,首次随访时的减少率更高。为获得长期效果,需要以再培训形式进行持续干预。