Suppr超能文献

养老院中的痴呆症关怀映射:对护理人员态度、工作满意度和倦怠的影响。一项准实验研究。

Dementia care mapping in nursing homes: effects on caregiver attitudes, job satisfaction, and burnout. A quasi-experimental trial.

机构信息

German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE),Witten,Germany.

mediStatistica,Neuenrade,Germany.

出版信息

Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Dec;29(12):1993-2006. doi: 10.1017/S104161021700148X. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) method is an internationally recognized complex intervention in dementia research and care for implementing person-centered care. The Leben-QD II trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of DCM with regard to caregivers.

METHODS

The nine participating nursing home units were allocated to three groups: (1) DCM method experienced ≥ 1 year, (2) DCM newly introduced during this trial, and (3) regular rating of residents' quality of life (control group). Linear mixed models were fit to cluster-aggregated data after 0, 6, and 18 months, adjusting for repeated measurements and confounders. The primary outcome was the Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire (ADQ) score; the secondary outcomes were the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI).

RESULTS

The analysis included 201 caregivers with 290 completed questionnaires (all three data collection time points). The ADQ showed a significant time and time*intervention effect. At baseline, the estimated least-square means for the ADQ were 71.98 (group A), 72.46 (group B), and 71.15 (group C). The non-linear follow-up of group A indicated an estimated-least square means of 69.71 (T 1) and 68.97 (T 2); for group B, 72.80 (T 1) and 72.29 (T 2); and for group C, 66.43 (T 1) and 70.62 (T 2).

CONCLUSIONS

The DCM method showed a tendency toward negatively affecting the primary and secondary outcomes; this finding could be explained by the substantial deviation in adherence to the intervention protocol.

摘要

背景

痴呆症关爱映射(DCM)方法是一种国际认可的复杂干预措施,用于在痴呆症研究和护理中实施以患者为中心的护理。Leben-QD II 试验旨在评估 DCM 对护理人员的有效性。

方法

将 9 个参与的养老院单位分配到 3 个组:(1)DCM 方法经验≥1 年,(2)本试验中新引入的 DCM,和(3)居民生活质量的常规评估(对照组)。在 0、6 和 18 个月后,对聚类聚集数据拟合线性混合模型,调整重复测量和混杂因素。主要结果是痴呆症方法问卷(ADQ)评分;次要结果是哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ)和哥本哈根倦怠量表(CBI)。

结果

分析包括 201 名护理人员,共完成 290 份问卷(所有三个数据收集时间点)。ADQ 显示出显著的时间和时间*干预效果。在基线时,ADQ 的估计最小二乘均值为 71.98(组 A)、72.46(组 B)和 71.15(组 C)。组 A 的非线性随访表明估计最小二乘均值为 69.71(T1)和 68.97(T2);组 B 为 72.80(T1)和 72.29(T2);组 C 为 66.43(T1)和 70.62(T2)。

结论

DCM 方法显示出对主要和次要结果产生负面影响的趋势;这种发现可以用对干预方案的严重偏离来解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验