• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《穿越痴呆症之旅:成功实施复杂干预措施的实用多中心试验的策略》。

The implementation of Journeying through Dementia: Strategies to run a successful pragmatic multicenter trial of a complex intervention.

机构信息

Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England.

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2021 Dec;11(12):e2436. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2436. Epub 2021 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1002/brb3.2436
PMID:34775690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8671795/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A key challenge in delivering pragmatic trials of complex interventions is effective implementation within the study period and beyond. We describe a trial of an intervention to improve quality of life in mild dementia (Journeying through Dementia), describe some of the challenges raised in terms of implementation, and illustrate the methods used to ensure effective implementation.

METHOD

The intervention was delivered by staff within local services and supervised by more experienced clinicians within those services in order to test the intervention in real-world settings and establish the potential for future embedding into practice. Researchers delivered training sessions for all facilitators and supervisors, met at regular intervals with intervention supervisors, and provided feedback on summaries of intervention sessions created by facilitators. We conducted a thematic analysis of the content of meetings and written correspondence between the researchers and intervention supervisors regarding implementation issues.

RESULTS

Key themes relating to difficulties with implementation were: staff absences and staff leaving posts; participant lack of engagement with intervention; difficulties with delivery of supervision; difficult group dynamics; lack of time to deliver the intervention; and lack of adherence to the intervention and its ethos.

CONCLUSION

We provide guidance for researchers involved in the trialing of other complex interventions in how these challenges might be overcome. These include: recruiting additional staff to deliver the intervention; having clear protocols in place for managing staff absences; using supervision to problem solve participant attendance at intervention sessions and difficult group dynamics; monitoring staff engagement in supervision and addressing problems with engagement with staff and managers when this occurs; giving staff ring-fenced time to deliver the intervention and engage in supervision; and regular monitoring and feedback in relation to the content of the intervention to ensure that it is consistent with ethos and content of the intervention manual.

摘要

目的

在进行复杂干预措施的实用试验中,一个关键挑战是在研究期间及之后有效地实施。我们描述了一项旨在改善轻度痴呆患者生活质量的干预措施的试验(Journeying through Dementia),描述了在实施方面提出的一些挑战,并说明了确保有效实施的方法。

方法

该干预措施由当地服务机构的工作人员提供,并由这些服务机构中的经验丰富的临床医生进行监督,以便在真实环境中测试干预措施,并确定未来将其纳入实践的潜力。研究人员为所有协调员和监督者提供了培训课程,定期与干预监督者会面,并为协调员创建的干预会议摘要提供反馈。我们对研究人员和干预监督者之间关于实施问题的会议内容和书面通信进行了主题分析。

结果

与实施困难相关的主要主题包括:工作人员缺勤和离职;参与者对干预措施缺乏参与;监督交付困难;小组动态困难;缺乏时间提供干预措施;以及缺乏对干预措施及其精神的坚持。

结论

我们为参与其他复杂干预措施试验的研究人员提供了指导,说明如何克服这些挑战。这些包括:招聘额外的工作人员来提供干预措施;制定明确的协议来管理工作人员的缺勤;利用监督来解决参与者参加干预会议和小组动态困难的问题;监测工作人员在监督中的参与情况,并在出现问题时与工作人员和管理人员解决问题;为工作人员提供专门用于提供干预措施和参与监督的时间;并定期监测和反馈干预措施的内容,以确保其与干预手册的精神和内容一致。

相似文献

1
The implementation of Journeying through Dementia: Strategies to run a successful pragmatic multicenter trial of a complex intervention.《穿越痴呆症之旅:成功实施复杂干预措施的实用多中心试验的策略》。
Brain Behav. 2021 Dec;11(12):e2436. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2436. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
2
An intervention to promote self-management, independence and self-efficacy in people with early-stage dementia: the Journeying through Dementia RCT.促进早期痴呆症患者自我管理、独立和自我效能感的干预措施:Journeying through Dementia RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 May;26(24):1-152. doi: 10.3310/KHHA0861.
3
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
4
5
Effectiveness of professional oral health care intervention on the oral health of residents with dementia in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review protocol.专业口腔保健干预对老年护理机构中痴呆症居民口腔健康的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):110-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2330.
6
Maintenance Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) in practice: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.维持性认知刺激疗法(CST)的实践:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Jun 26;13:91. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-91.
7
A collective case study of the features of impactful dementia training for care home staff.针对养老院员工的有影响力的痴呆症培训的特征进行的集体案例研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1186-z.
8
Developing strategies to improve fidelity of delivery of, and engagement with, a complex intervention to improve independence in dementia: a mixed methods study.制定策略提高改善痴呆症独立性的复杂干预措施实施和参与的保真度:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 12;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01006-x.
9
10
Process evaluation of an implementation study in dementia care (EIT-4-BPSD): stakeholder perspectives.实施研究在痴呆症护理中的过程评估(EIT-4-BPSD):利益相关者的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 23;21(1):1006. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07001-2.

引用本文的文献

1
What is known about the role of external facilitators during the implementation of complex interventions in healthcare settings? A scoping review.外部促进者在医疗保健环境中实施复杂干预措施中的作用是什么? 范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 1;14(6):e084883. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084883.

本文引用的文献

1
Journeying through Dementia Randomised Controlled Trial of a Psychosocial Intervention for People Living with Early Dementia: Embedded Qualitative Study with Participants, Carers and Interventionists.痴呆症之旅:针对早期痴呆症患者的心理社会干预的随机对照试验:对参与者、照顾者和干预者进行的嵌入式定性研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Feb 4;16:231-244. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S293921. eCollection 2021.
2
Assessing fidelity of a community based psychosocial intervention for people with mild dementia within a large randomised controlled trial.评估一项基于社区的针对轻度痴呆症患者的心理社会干预措施在一项大型随机对照试验中的忠实度。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Feb 11;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02070-8.
3
Overcoming barriers to implementing ward-based psychosocial interventions in acute inpatient mental health settings: A meta-synthesis.克服急性住院精神卫生环境中基于病房的心理社会干预实施障碍:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Mar;115:103870. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103870. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
4
Challenges in the design, planning and implementation of trials evaluating group interventions.评估团体干预措施的试验在设计、规划和实施上面临的挑战。
Trials. 2020 Jan 29;21(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3807-4.
5
Effective clinical supervision of allied health professionals: a mixed methods study.有效临床监督的辅助卫生专业人员:混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 31;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4873-8.
6
Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Journeying through Dementia (JtD) intervention compared to usual care.一项随机对照试验的研究方案,该试验旨在评估与常规护理相比,“痴呆症之旅”(JtD)干预措施的临床效果和成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 13;9(9):e029207. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029207.
7
Burnout and Health Care Workforce Turnover. burnout 与医疗保健劳动力流动。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jan;17(1):36-41. doi: 10.1370/afm.2338.
8
Dementia care mapping in nursing homes: effects on caregiver attitudes, job satisfaction, and burnout. A quasi-experimental trial.养老院中的痴呆症关怀映射:对护理人员态度、工作满意度和倦怠的影响。一项准实验研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Dec;29(12):1993-2006. doi: 10.1017/S104161021700148X. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
9
Advancing engagement methods for trials: the CORE study relational model of engagement for a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of experience-based co-design for people living with severe mental illnesses.推进试验的参与方法:CORE研究中针对严重精神疾病患者基于体验的协同设计阶梯式楔形整群随机对照试验的参与关系模型
Trials. 2017 Apr 8;18(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1878-7.
10
Journeying through Dementia, a community-based self-management intervention for people aged 65 years and over: a feasibility study to inform a future trial.《穿越痴呆症之旅》,一项针对65岁及以上人群的基于社区的自我管理干预措施:一项为未来试验提供信息的可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015 Nov 30;1:42. doi: 10.1186/s40814-015-0039-6. eCollection 2015.