• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机轴位断层摄影术中不同安装方法对髁突倾斜度评估的影响

Impact of mounting methods in computerized axiography on assessment of condylar inclination.

作者信息

Schierz Oliver, Wagner Philipp, Rauch Angelika, Reissmann Daniel R

机构信息

a Department of Prosthodontics and Materials Science , University of Leipzig , Leipzig , Germany.

b Private Dental Practice , Weissenfels , Germany.

出版信息

Cranio. 2019 Jan;37(1):60-67. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2017.1367060. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1080/08869634.2017.1367060
PMID:28854058
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Valid and reliable recording is a key requirement for accurately simulating individual jaw movements.

METHODS

Horizontal condylar inclination (HCI) and Bennett's angle were measured using a digital jaw tracker (Cadiax® Compact 2) in 27 young adults. Three mounting methods (paraocclusal tray adapter, periocclusal tray adapter, and tray adapter with mandibular clamp) were tested.

RESULTS

The mean values of the HCI differed by up to 10° between the mounting methods; however, the values for Bennett's angle did not differ substantially. While the intersession reliability of the Bennett's angle assessment did not depend on the mounting method, the reliability of the HCI assessment was only fair to good for the paraocclusal mounting method but poor for both periocclusal mounting methods.

DISCUSSION

For attaching the tracing bow of jaw trackers to the mandible, a paraocclusal tray adapter should be applied, to achieve the most reliable results.

摘要

目的

有效且可靠的记录是准确模拟个体颌运动的关键要求。

方法

使用数字颌追踪器(Cadiax® Compact 2)对27名年轻成年人测量水平髁突倾斜度(HCI)和贝内特角。测试了三种安装方法(咬合面托盘适配器、近咬合面托盘适配器和带下颌夹的托盘适配器)。

结果

不同安装方法之间HCI的平均值相差高达10°;然而,贝内特角的值没有显著差异。虽然贝内特角评估的组间可靠性不取决于安装方法,但HCI评估的可靠性对于咬合面安装方法仅为一般到良好,而对于两种近咬合面安装方法则较差。

讨论

为了将颌追踪器的描记弓连接到下颌骨上,应使用咬合面托盘适配器,以获得最可靠的结果。

相似文献

1
Impact of mounting methods in computerized axiography on assessment of condylar inclination.计算机轴位断层摄影术中不同安装方法对髁突倾斜度评估的影响
Cranio. 2019 Jan;37(1):60-67. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2017.1367060. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
2
Comparative tests of arbitrary and kinematic transverse horizontal axis recordings of mandibular movements.下颌运动的任意性和运动学横向水平轴记录的对比测试。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Feb;89(2):175-9. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.10.
3
The reliability of computerized condylar path angle assessment.计算机化髁突路径角评估的可靠性。
Int J Comput Dent. 2014;17(1):35-51.
4
ARTICULATOR-RELATED REGISTRATION AND ANALYSIS OF SAGITTAL CONDYLAR INCLINATION.与咬合架相关的矢状髁突倾斜度记录与分析
Acta Clin Croat. 2015 Dec;54(4):432-7.
5
Comparisons of condylar movements with the functional occlusal clutch and tray clutch recording methods in CADIAX system.CADIAX 系统中髁突运动的功能咬合离合器和托盘离合器记录方法比较。
Int J Oral Sci. 2010 Dec;2(4):208-14. doi: 10.4248/IJOS10071.
6
Evaluation of the Cadiax Compact® II accuracy in recording preadjusted condylar inclinations on fully adjustable articulator.评估Cadiax Compact® II在全可调牙合架上记录预调髁导斜度时的准确性。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Jul 1;13(4):504-8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1176.
7
Preliminary clinical study of the accuracy of a digital axiographic recording system for the assessment of sagittal condylar inclination.数字化关节动度描记系统评估矢状髁突倾斜度的准确性:初步临床研究
J Dent. 2023 Aug;135:104583. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104583. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
8
Recording sagittal condylar angles using a mandibular facebow.使用下颌面弓记录髁突矢状角。
J Oral Rehabil. 1997 Dec;24(12):904-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00204.x.
9
Measurements of the sagittal condylar inclination: intraindividual variations.髁突矢状倾斜度的测量:个体内变异
Cranio. 2014 Apr;32(2):104-9. doi: 10.1179/0886963413Z.00000000015.
10
A comparative analysis of optical and conventional axiography for the analysis of temporomandibular joint movements.用于颞下颌关节运动分析的光学轴描记法与传统轴描记法的比较分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Nov;90(5):503-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00482-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of accuracy between protrusive interocclusal record and horizontal condylar guidance angle recording methods in dentulous patients.在有牙患者中,对伸颌记录与水平髁导记录方法之间准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2024 Jan 1;24(1):3-14. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_382_23. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
2
Evaluation of accuracy between extraoral Gothic arch tracing and various other methods assessing horizontal condylar guidance angle in completely edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.评估完全无牙患者外哥特式弓描记与其他各种方法评估水平髁突引导角的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023 Oct-Dec;23(4):322-334. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_216_23.
3
Intraindividual Left-Right Side Differences of Sagittal Condylar Inclination (SCI) in Different Skeletal Classes.不同骨骼类型中矢状髁突倾斜度(SCI)的个体左右侧差异
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 7;11(9):1341. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091341.
4
Temporomandibular dysfunction diagnosis by means of computerized axiography.通过计算机轴面断层摄影术诊断颞下颌关节紊乱症
Med Pharm Rep. 2020 Oct;93(4):416-421. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1754. Epub 2020 Oct 25.