Suppr超能文献

促进优质产妇护理服务权利意识的原则和流程:利益相关者经验和实施因素的综合分析。

Principles and processes behind promoting awareness of rights for quality maternal care services: a synthesis of stakeholder experiences and implementation factors.

机构信息

South African Research Chair in Health Systems, Complexity and Social Change, School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville, 7535, South Africa.

Health Systems Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1446-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Promoting awareness of rights is a value-based process that entails a different way of thinking and acting, which is at times misunderstood or deemed as aspirational.

METHODS

Guided by the SURE framework, we undertook a secondary analysis of 26 documents identified by an earlier systematic review on promoting awareness of rights to increase use of maternity care services. We thematically analysed stakeholder experiences and implementation factors across the diverse initiatives to derive common elements to guide future efforts.

RESULTS

Interventions that promote awareness of rights for maternal health varied in nature, methodological orientation, depth and quality. Materials included booklets, posters, pamphlets/ briefs and service standards/charters. Target populations included women, family members, communities, community structures, community-based and non governmental organizations, health providers and administrators, as well as elected representatives. While one initiative only focused on raising awareness, most were embedded within larger efforts to improve the accountability and responsiveness of service delivery through community monitoring and advocacy, with a few aiming to change policies and contest elections. Underlying these action oriented forms of promoting awareness of rights, was a critical consciousness and attitudinal change gained through iterative capacity-building for all stakeholders; materials and processes that supported group discussion and interaction; the formation or strengthening of community groups; situational analysis to ensure adaptation to local context; facilitation to ensure common ground and language across stakeholders; and strategic networking and alliance building across health system levels. While many positive experiences are discussed, few challenges or barriers to implementation are documented. The limited documentation and poor quality of information found indicate that while various examples of promoting awareness of rights for maternal health exists, research partnerships to systematically evaluate their processes, learning and effects are lacking.

CONCLUSION

Rather than being aspirational, several examples of promoting awareness of women's rights for quality maternity care services exist. More than mainly disseminate information, they aim to change stakeholder mindsets and relationships across health system levels. Due to their transformatory intent they require sustained investment, with strategic planning, concrete operationalization and political adeptness to manage dynamic stakeholder expectations and reactions overtime. More investment is also required in research partnerships that support such initiatives and better elucidate their context specific variations.

摘要

背景

提高权利意识是一个基于价值观的过程,需要一种不同的思维和行动方式,有时这种方式会被误解或被视为理想主义。

方法

我们以 SURE 框架为指导,对早期系统评价中确定的 26 份文件进行了二次分析,该系统评价旨在促进权利意识,以增加使用产妇保健服务。我们对跨多样性倡议的利益相关者经验和实施因素进行了主题分析,以得出指导未来工作的共同要素。

结果

促进产妇健康权利意识的干预措施在性质、方法取向、深度和质量上各不相同。材料包括小册子、海报、小册子/简介和服务标准/章程。目标人群包括妇女、家庭成员、社区、社区结构、社区组织和非政府组织、卫生服务提供者和行政人员以及民选代表。虽然有一项倡议仅侧重于提高认识,但大多数倡议都嵌入在通过社区监测和宣传来提高服务提供问责制和回应能力的更大努力中,少数倡议旨在改变政策和争取选举。在这些以行动为导向的提高权利意识形式的背后,是通过所有利益相关者的迭代能力建设获得的批判意识和态度转变;支持小组讨论和互动的材料和流程;社区团体的形成或加强;情景分析以确保适应当地情况;促进以确保所有利益相关者之间的共同点和语言;以及在卫生系统各级建立战略网络和联盟。虽然讨论了许多积极的经验,但很少有记录实施的挑战或障碍。所发现的有限文件和信息质量差表明,虽然存在各种促进产妇保健权利意识的例子,但缺乏研究伙伴关系来系统地评估其过程、学习和影响。

结论

促进对妇女享有优质产妇保健服务权利意识的例子并不多,而不是理想主义的。它们的目的不是主要传播信息,而是改变卫生系统各级利益相关者的思维方式和关系。由于其变革性意图,它们需要持续投资,需要战略规划、具体实施和政治机敏性,以随着时间的推移管理动态的利益相关者期望和反应。还需要更多投资于支持这些举措的研究伙伴关系,并更好地阐明其特定于上下文的变化。

相似文献

3
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
4
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
10
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Engaging stakeholders in the north-west first 1000 days project: building a strong community support ecosystem.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):2730. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24082-4.
5
Barriers to implementing guideline recommendations to improve childbirth care: a rapid review of evidence.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Feb 22;45:e7. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.7. eCollection 2021.
6
If I was minister of health: democratising healthcare.
J R Soc Med. 2021 Mar;114(3):140-145. doi: 10.1177/0141076821992442. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
8
Building a transformative agenda for accountability in SRHR: lessons learned from SRHR and accountability literatures.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 May;27(2):1622357. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2019.1622357.

本文引用的文献

2
Community participation for transformative action on women's, children's and adolescents' health.
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 May 1;94(5):376-82. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.168492. Epub 2016 May 2.
5
Do Interventions that Promote Awareness of Rights Increase Use of Maternity Care Services? A Systematic Review.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 7;10(10):e0138116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138116. eCollection 2015.
6
Health rights pamphlets: critical literacy and inclusive citizenship, South Africa.
Health Promot Int. 2014 Jun;29(2):339-48. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das067. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
7
Improving maternal health through social accountability: a case study from Orissa, India.
Glob Public Health. 2013;8(4):449-64. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2012.748085. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
8
Ten years of negotiating rights around maternal health in Uttar Pradesh, India.
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2011 Dec 16;11 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S4. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-11-S3-S4.
9
Advancing obstetric and neonatal care in a regional hospital in Ghana via continuous quality improvement.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Jan;116(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
10
Globalisation and health inequalities: can a human rights paradigm create space for civil society action?
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jan;74(1):6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.022. Epub 2011 Apr 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验