Suppr超能文献

通过认知重新评估和悲伤来调节压力下的愤怒情绪。

Regulating Anger under Stress via Cognitive Reappraisal and Sadness.

作者信息

Zhan Jun, Wu Xiaofei, Fan Jin, Guo Jianyou, Zhou Jianshe, Ren Jun, Liu Chang, Luo Jing

机构信息

Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, Collaborative Innovation Center for Capital Education Development, Department of Psychology, Capital Normal UniversityBeijing, China.

Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, New YorkNY, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 14;8:1372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01372. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Previous studies have reported the failure of cognitive emotion regulation (CER), especially in regulating unpleasant emotions under stress. The underlying reason for this failure was the application of CER depends heavily on the executive function of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), but this function can be impaired by stress-related neuroendocrine hormones. This observation highlights the necessity of developing self-regulatory strategies that require less top-down cognitive control. Based on traditional Chinese philosophy and medicine, which examine how different types of emotions promote or counteract one another, we have developed a novel emotion regulation strategy whereby one emotion is used to alter another. For example, our previous experiment showed that sadness induction (after watching a sad film) could reduce aggressive behavior associated with anger [i.e., "sadness counteracts anger" (SCA)] (Zhan et al., 2015). Relative to the CER strategy requiring someone to think about certain cognitive reappraisals to reinterpret the meaning of an unpleasant situation, watching a film or listening to music and experiencing the emotion contained therein seemingly requires less cognitive effort and control; therefore, this SCA strategy may be an alternative strategy that compensates for the limitations of cognitive regulation strategies, especially in stressful situations. The present study was designed to directly compare the effects of the CER and SCA strategy in regulating anger and anger-related aggression in stressful and non-stressful conditions. Participants' subjective feeling of anger, anger-related aggressive behavior, skin conductance, and salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase levels were measured. Our findings revealed that acute stress impaired one's ability to use CR to control angry responses provoked by others, whereas stress did not influence the efficiency of the SCA strategy. Compared with sadness or neutral emotion induction, CER induction was found to reduce the level of subjective anger more, but this difference only existed in non-stressful conditions. By contrast, irrespective of stress, the levels of aggressive behavior and related skin conductance after sadness induction were both significantly lower than those after CER induction or neutral emotion induction, thus suggesting the immunity of the regulatory effect of SCA strategy to the stress factor.

摘要

先前的研究报告了认知情绪调节(CER)的失效,尤其是在压力下调节不愉快情绪方面。这种失效的根本原因在于,CER的应用严重依赖前额叶皮质(PFC)的执行功能,但该功能会受到与压力相关的神经内分泌激素的损害。这一观察结果凸显了开发需要较少自上而下认知控制的自我调节策略的必要性。基于中国传统哲学和医学对不同类型情绪如何相互促进或抵消的研究,我们开发了一种新颖的情绪调节策略,即利用一种情绪来改变另一种情绪。例如,我们之前的实验表明,诱发悲伤情绪(观看悲伤电影后)可以减少与愤怒相关的攻击行为[即“悲伤抵消愤怒”(SCA)](Zhan等人,2015年)。相对于CER策略要求某人思考某些认知重新评估以重新解释不愉快情境的含义,观看电影或听音乐并体验其中包含的情绪似乎需要较少的认知努力和控制;因此,这种SCA策略可能是一种替代策略,可弥补认知调节策略的局限性,尤其是在压力情境中。本研究旨在直接比较CER和SCA策略在压力和非压力条件下调节愤怒及与愤怒相关的攻击行为的效果。测量了参与者的主观愤怒感受、与愤怒相关的攻击行为、皮肤电导率以及唾液皮质醇和α-淀粉酶水平。我们的研究结果显示,急性压力会损害个体使用CER来控制他人引发的愤怒反应的能力,而压力并未影响SCA策略的效率。与诱发悲伤或中性情绪相比,发现CER诱发能更有效地降低主观愤怒水平,但这种差异仅存在于非压力条件下。相比之下,无论是否存在压力,诱发悲伤情绪后的攻击行为水平和相关皮肤电导率均显著低于CER诱发或中性情绪诱发后的水平,这表明SCA策略的调节效果对压力因素具有免疫性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6bc/5557741/6beaaeabe586/fpsyg-08-01372-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验