Duan Jingliang, Li Renjie, Hou Lian, Wang Wenjun, Li Guofa, Li Shengbo Eben, Cheng Bo, Gao Hongbo
State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Department of Automotive Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Institute of Human Factors and Ergonomics, College of Mechatronics and Control Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.022. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
Bicycling is one of the fundamental modes of transportation especially in developing countries. Because of the lack of effective protection for bicyclists, vehicle-bicycle (V-B) accident has become a primary contributor to traffic fatalities. Although AEB (Autonomous Emergency Braking) systems have been developed to avoid or mitigate collisions, they need to be further adapted in various conflict situations. This paper analyzes the driver's braking behavior in typical V-B conflicts of China to improve the performance of Bicyclist-AEB systems. Naturalistic driving data were collected, from which the top three scenarios of V-B accidents in China were extracted, including SCR (a bicycle crossing the road from right while a car is driving straight), SCL (a bicycle crossing the road from left while a car is driving straight) and SSR (a bicycle swerving in front of the car from right while a car is driving straight). For safety and data reliability, a driving simulator was employed to reconstruct these three scenarios and some 25 licensed drivers were recruited for braking behavior analysis. Results revealed that driver's braking behavior was significantly influenced by V-B conflict types. Pre-decelerating behaviors were found in SCL and SSR conflicts, whereas in SCR the subjects were less vigilant. The brake reaction time and brake severity in lateral V-B conflicts (SCR and SCL) was shorter and higher than that in longitudinal conflicts (SSR). The findings improve their applications in the Bicyclist-AEB and test protocol enactment to enhance the performance of Bicyclist-AEB systems in mixed traffic situations especially for developing countries.
骑自行车是一种基本的交通方式,尤其在发展中国家。由于缺乏对骑自行车者的有效保护,车辆与自行车(V-B)事故已成为交通死亡事故的主要原因。尽管已经开发了自动紧急制动(AEB)系统来避免或减轻碰撞,但它们需要在各种冲突情况下进一步改进。本文分析了中国典型V-B冲突中驾驶员的制动行为,以提高自行车AEB系统的性能。收集了自然驾驶数据,从中提取了中国V-B事故的前三种场景,包括SCR(汽车直行时自行车从右侧过马路)、SCL(汽车直行时自行车从左侧过马路)和SSR(汽车直行时自行车从右侧在汽车前方转弯)。为了安全和数据可靠性,使用驾驶模拟器重建这三种场景,并招募了约25名有执照的驾驶员进行制动行为分析。结果表明,驾驶员的制动行为受V-B冲突类型的显著影响。在SCL和SSR冲突中发现了预减速行为,而在SCR中受试者的警惕性较低。横向V-B冲突(SCR和SCL)中的制动反应时间和制动强度比纵向冲突(SSR)中的更短、更高。这些发现改进了它们在自行车AEB中的应用以及测试协议的制定,以提高自行车AEB系统在混合交通情况下的性能,特别是对于发展中国家。