Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Aug 31;16(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0658-z.
There are varying data on whether socioeconomic status (SES) affects the treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our aim was to obtain a reliable estimate of the effect of SES on discharge prescription of medications following an ACS through systematic review and meta-analysis.
Medline, EMBASE and Global Health were searched systematically on 6th April 2016. Studies were eligible if the participants had ACS and reported the rate/odds of guideline-recommended ACS medications prescription (aspirin, antiplatelet, beta blocker, angiotensin co-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and statin) at discharge stratified by SES. A meta-analysis was performed to pool the estimates, comparing the prescription ratio (PR) between the lowest and the highest SES groups.
Of 252 articles found from the search, seven met the eligibility criteria and it included 41,462 (20,986 from the lowest SES group) patients. We found that the individual/neighbourhood level SES did not affect the prescription of aspirin (PR (95% CI): 0.97 (0.91, 1.03)), but for beta blocker and statin, the lowest SES group were disadvantaged (0.84 (0.73, 0.94), 0.80 (0.62, 0.98), respectively). In contrast, ACEi were prescribed more often to the lowest individual/neighbourhood level SES group than the highest (1.13 (1.05, 1.22)). Although the risk of bias was low, there was considerable heterogeneity between the studies.
Despite the recommendations to close the treatment gap, the rate of prescription of guideline-recommended medications in managing ACS is significantly different between patients with the lowest and the highest groups. A solution is needed to provide equitable care across the SES groups.
Systematic review registration no.: CRD42016048503. Registered 28 September 2016.
关于社会经济地位(SES)是否会影响急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的治疗,现有数据存在差异。我们的目的是通过系统评价和荟萃分析,获得有关 SES 对 ACS 出院后药物处方影响的可靠估计。
于 2016 年 4 月 6 日系统检索了 Medline、EMBASE 和全球卫生数据库。如果参与者患有 ACS,并报告了出院时根据 SES 分层的指南推荐的 ACS 药物处方(阿司匹林、抗血小板、β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)和他汀类药物)的比率/比值比(OR),则研究符合纳入标准。对这些估计值进行荟萃分析,比较最低 SES 组和最高 SES 组之间的处方比例(PR)。
从检索中找到了 252 篇文章,其中 7 篇符合纳入标准,共纳入了 41462 名(最低 SES 组 20986 名)患者。我们发现,个体/社区 SES 并不影响阿司匹林的处方(PR(95%CI):0.97(0.91,1.03)),但对于β受体阻滞剂和他汀类药物,最低 SES 组处于劣势(0.84(0.73,0.94),0.80(0.62,0.98))。相反,ACEi 处方给最低 SES 个体/社区水平的患者比最高 SES 水平的患者更多(1.13(1.05,1.22))。尽管偏倚风险较低,但研究之间存在很大的异质性。
尽管有建议缩小治疗差距,但在最低 SES 组和最高 SES 组患者之间,指南推荐的药物治疗管理 ACS 的处方率存在显著差异。需要采取措施为 SES 群体提供公平的护理。
PROSPERO 注册号:系统评价注册编号:CRD42016048503。注册于 2016 年 9 月 28 日。