de Vries Daniel H
Department of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hum Ecol Interdiscip J. 2017;45(4):437-448. doi: 10.1007/s10745-017-9915-4. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
After major flooding associated with Hurricane Floyd (1999) in North Carolina, mitigation managers seized upon the "window of opportunity" to woo residents to accept residential buyout offers despite sizable community resistance. I present a theoretical explanation of how post-crisis periods turn into "opportunities" based on a temporal referential theory that complements alternative explanations based on temporal coincidence, panarchy, and shock-doctrine theories. Results from fieldwork conducted from 2002 to 2004 illustrate how several temporal influences compromised collective calibration of "normalcy" in local cultural models, leading to an especially heightened vulnerability to collective surprise. Four factors particularly influenced this temporal vulnerability: 1) epistemological uncertainty of floodplain dynamics due to colonization; 2) cultural practices that maintained a casual amnesia; 3) meaning attributed to stochastic timing of floods; and 4) competitive impact of referential flood baseline attractors.
1999年北卡罗来纳州遭遇与“弗洛伊德”飓风相关的重大洪水后,减灾管理人员抓住“机会之窗”,不顾社区的强烈抵制,劝说居民接受住宅收购提议。我基于一种时间参照理论,对危机后时期如何转变为“机遇”提出了一种理论解释,该理论补充了基于时间巧合、泛archy理论和休克主义理论的其他解释。2002年至2004年进行的实地调查结果表明,几种时间影响如何损害了当地文化模型中“常态”的集体校准,导致对集体意外的特别高的脆弱性。四个因素尤其影响了这种时间脆弱性:1)殖民化导致洪泛区动态的认识论不确定性;2)维持随意失忆的文化习俗;3)赋予洪水随机时间的意义;4)参照洪水基线吸引子的竞争影响。