• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯估计 DINA Q 矩阵。

Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.

机构信息

Department of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV, 89557 , USA.

Department of Statistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 725 South Wright Street, Champaign, IL, 61820 , USA.

出版信息

Psychometrika. 2018 Mar;83(1):89-108. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9579-4. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1007/s11336-017-9579-4
PMID:28861685
Abstract

Cognitive diagnosis models are partially ordered latent class models and are used to classify students into skill mastery profiles. The deterministic inputs, noisy "and" gate model (DINA) is a popular psychometric model for cognitive diagnosis. Application of the DINA model requires content expert knowledge of a Q matrix, which maps the attributes or skills needed to master a collection of items. Misspecification of Q has been shown to yield biased diagnostic classifications. We propose a Bayesian framework for estimating the DINA Q matrix. The developed algorithm builds upon prior research (Chen, Liu, Xu, & Ying, in J Am Stat Assoc 110(510):850-866, 2015) and ensures the estimated Q matrix is identified. Monte Carlo evidence is presented to support the accuracy of parameter recovery. The developed methodology is applied to Tatsuoka's fraction-subtraction dataset.

摘要

认知诊断模型是部分有序潜在类别模型,用于将学生分类为技能掌握情况。确定性输入、噪声“与”门模型(DINA)是认知诊断的一种流行心理测量模型。DINA 模型的应用需要 Q 矩阵的内容专家知识,该矩阵映射掌握一组项目所需的属性或技能。已经表明,Q 的错误指定会导致有偏差的诊断分类。我们提出了一种用于估计 DINA Q 矩阵的贝叶斯框架。所开发的算法基于先前的研究(Chen、Liu、Xu 和 Ying,在 J Am Stat Assoc 110(510):850-866,2015),并确保估计的 Q 矩阵是可识别的。提出了蒙特卡罗证据来支持参数恢复的准确性。所开发的方法应用于 Tatsuoka 的分数减法数据集。

相似文献

1
Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.贝叶斯估计 DINA Q 矩阵。
Psychometrika. 2018 Mar;83(1):89-108. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9579-4. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
2
Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.可扩展的贝叶斯方法用于结合随机优化和变分推断的 Dina Q-矩阵估计。
Psychometrika. 2023 Mar;88(1):302-331. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09884-4. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
3
Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.使用无回转采样器估计DINA模型参数。
Biom J. 2018 Mar;60(2):352-368. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600225. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
4
A Constrained Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models.一种用于 DINA 模型中 Q 矩阵估计的受限 metropolis-hastings robbins-monro 算法。
Psychometrika. 2020 Jun;85(2):322-357. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09707-4. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
5
Estimating the Cognitive Diagnosis [Formula: see text] Matrix with Expert Knowledge: Application to the Fraction-Subtraction Dataset.运用专家知识估计认知诊断 [公式:见正文] 矩阵:在分数减法数据集上的应用。
Psychometrika. 2019 Jun;84(2):333-357. doi: 10.1007/s11336-018-9643-8. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
6
The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.使用 Rasch 和确定性输入、嘈杂“与”门诊断分类模型对每个内容领域的掌握程度的准确性和一致性:一项基于韩国医师执照考试数据的模拟研究和真实世界分析。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:15. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.15. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
7
An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model.多选项 G-DINA 模型的实证 Q 矩阵验证方法。
Psychometrika. 2022 Jun;87(2):693-724. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09821-x. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.序贯广义 DINA 模型的经验 Q 矩阵验证方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Feb;73(1):142-163. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12156. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
9
A classification model for continuous responses: Identifying risk perception groups on health-related activities.一种针对连续反应的分类模型:识别与健康相关活动的风险认知群体。
Biom J. 2023 Apr;65(4):e2100222. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100222. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
10
Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.使用确定性输入、噪声与门(DINA)模型,对韩国医师执照考试各领域项目参数和考生掌握概率进行估计。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:35. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.35. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Priority attribute algorithm for Q-matrix validation: A didactic.用于Q矩阵验证的优先级属性算法:一个教学示例。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 30;57(1):31. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02547-5.
2
A Two-Step Q-Matrix Estimation Method.一种两步Q矩阵估计方法。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2024 Oct 10:01466216241284418. doi: 10.1177/01466216241284418.
3
An Exploration of Cognitive Diagnosis in Medical Education: Constructing Comprehensive Feedback for Enhanced Student Learning.医学教育中的认知诊断探索:构建全面反馈以促进学生学习

本文引用的文献

1
On the Consistency of Q-Matrix Estimation: A Commentary.Q 矩阵估计的一致性:评论。
Psychometrika. 2017 Jun;82(2):523-527. doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9487-4. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
2
Statistical Analysis of -matrix Based Diagnostic Classification Models.基于矩阵的诊断分类模型的统计分析
J Am Stat Assoc. 2015;110(510):850-866. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.934827.
3
Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.诊断分类模型的可识别性。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 May 10;34(5):1117-1122. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02064-2. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
An exploratory Q-matrix estimation method based on sparse non-negative matrix factorization.基于稀疏非负矩阵分解的探索性 Q 矩阵估计方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7647-7673. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02442-z. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
5
New Paradigm of Identifiable General-response Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Beyond Categorical Data.可识别的通用反应认知诊断模型的新范式:超越类别数据。
Psychometrika. 2024 Dec;89(4):1304-1336. doi: 10.1007/s11336-024-09983-4. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
6
Bayesian Double Feature Allocation for Phenotyping with Electronic Health Records.用于电子健康记录表型分析的贝叶斯双特征分配法
J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115(532):1620-1634. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2019.1686985. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
7
Going Deep in Diagnostic Modeling: Deep Cognitive Diagnostic Models (DeepCDMs).深入诊断建模:深度认知诊断模型(DeepCDMs)。
Psychometrika. 2024 Mar;89(1):118-150. doi: 10.1007/s11336-023-09941-6. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
8
Using machine learning to improve Q-matrix validation.使用机器学习改进 Q 矩阵验证。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1916-1935. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02126-0. Epub 2023 May 25.
9
A Joint MLE Approach to Large-Scale Structured Latent Attribute Analysis.一种用于大规模结构化潜在属性分析的联合极大似然估计方法。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2023;118(541):746-760. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2021.1955689. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
10
Deterministic Input, Noisy Mixed Modeling for Identifying Coexisting Condensation Rules in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments.用于在认知诊断评估中识别共存凝聚规则的确定性输入、噪声混合建模
J Intell. 2023 Mar 16;11(3):55. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11030055.
Psychometrika. 2016 Sep;81(3):625-49. doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9471-z. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
4
A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation.一种经验性Q矩阵验证的通用方法。
Psychometrika. 2016 Jun;81(2):253-73. doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9467-8. Epub 2015 May 6.
5
The Reduced RUM as a Logit Model: Parameterization and Constraints.作为逻辑回归模型的简约RUM:参数化与约束条件
Psychometrika. 2016 Jun;81(2):350-70. doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9460-2. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
6
Theory of the Self-learning -Matrix.自学习矩阵理论
Bernoulli (Andover). 2013 Nov 1;19(5A):1790-1817. doi: 10.3150/12-BEJ430.
7
Data-Driven Learning of Q-Matrix.基于数据驱动的Q矩阵学习
Appl Psychol Meas. 2012 Oct;36(7):548-564. doi: 10.1177/0146621612456591.
8
The DINA model as a constrained general diagnostic model: Two variants of a model equivalency.作为一种受限通用诊断模型的DINA模型:模型等效性的两种变体。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2014 Feb;67(1):49-71. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12003. Epub 2013 Jan 8.