• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于稀疏非负矩阵分解的探索性 Q 矩阵估计方法。

An exploratory Q-matrix estimation method based on sparse non-negative matrix factorization.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Jiangxi Nomal University, Nanchang, China.

School of Computer and Information Engineering, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7647-7673. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02442-z. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02442-z
PMID:39060862
Abstract

Cognitive diagnostic assessment (CDA) is widely used because it can provide refined diagnostic information. The Q-matrix is the basis of CDA, and can be specified by domain experts or by data-driven estimation methods based on observed response data. The data-driven Q-matrix estimation methods have become a research hotspot because of their objectivity, accuracy, and low calibration cost. However, most of the existing data-driven methods require known prior knowledge, such as initial Q-matrix, partial q-vector, or the number of attributes. Under the G-DINA model, we propose to estimate the number of attributes and Q-matrix elements simultaneously without any prior knowledge by the sparse non-negative matrix factorization (SNMF) method, which has the advantage of high scalability and universality. Simulation studies are carried out to investigate the performance of the SNMF. The results under a wide variety of simulation conditions indicate that the SNMF has good performance in the accuracy of attribute number and Q-matrix elements estimation. In addition, a set of real data is taken as an example to illustrate its application. Finally, we discuss the limitations of the current study and directions for future research.

摘要

认知诊断评估(CDA)被广泛应用,因为它可以提供更精细的诊断信息。Q 矩阵是 CDA 的基础,可以由领域专家指定,也可以通过基于观察到的反应数据的数据驱动估计方法指定。由于其客观性、准确性和低校准成本,数据驱动的 Q 矩阵估计方法已成为研究热点。然而,大多数现有的数据驱动方法需要先验知识,例如初始 Q 矩阵、部分 q-向量或属性数量。在 G-DINA 模型下,我们提出通过稀疏非负矩阵分解(SNMF)方法同时估计属性数量和 Q 矩阵元素,而无需任何先验知识,该方法具有可扩展性和通用性的优势。通过仿真研究来研究 SNMF 的性能。在广泛的仿真条件下的结果表明,SNMF 在属性数量和 Q 矩阵元素估计的准确性方面具有良好的性能。此外,还以一组真实数据为例说明了它的应用。最后,我们讨论了当前研究的局限性和未来研究的方向。

相似文献

1
An exploratory Q-matrix estimation method based on sparse non-negative matrix factorization.基于稀疏非负矩阵分解的探索性 Q 矩阵估计方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7647-7673. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02442-z. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
2
Data-driven Q-matrix learning based on Boolean matrix factorization in cognitive diagnostic assessment.认知诊断评估中基于布尔矩阵分解的数据驱动Q矩阵学习
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2022 Nov;75(3):638-667. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12271. Epub 2022 May 16.
3
An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.序贯广义 DINA 模型的经验 Q 矩阵验证方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Feb;73(1):142-163. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12156. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
4
Data-driven Q-matrix validation using a residual-based statistic in cognitive diagnostic assessment.基于残差统计的认知诊断评估中数据驱动的 Q 矩阵验证。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Nov;73 Suppl 1:145-179. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12191. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
5
Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.可扩展的贝叶斯方法用于结合随机优化和变分推断的 Dina Q-矩阵估计。
Psychometrika. 2023 Mar;88(1):302-331. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09884-4. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
6
Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.贝叶斯估计 DINA Q 矩阵。
Psychometrika. 2018 Mar;83(1):89-108. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9579-4. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
7
A multiple logistic regression-based (MLR-B) Q-matrix validation method for cognitive diagnosis models:A confirmatory approach.基于多项逻辑回归的(MLR-B)Q 矩阵验证方法在认知诊断模型中的应用:一种验证方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jun;55(4):2080-2092. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01880-x. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
8
On the Consistency of Q-Matrix Estimation: A Rejoinder.Q 矩阵估计的一致性:再答复。
Psychometrika. 2017 Jun;82(2):528-529. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9508-y. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
9
Methods for online calibration of Q-matrix and item parameters for polytomous responses in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.多类别反应认知诊断计算机化自适应测验中 Q 矩阵和项目参数的在线标定方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):6792-6811. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02392-6. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
10
An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model.多选项 G-DINA 模型的实证 Q 矩阵验证方法。
Psychometrika. 2022 Jun;87(2):693-724. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09821-x. Epub 2021 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Bayesian Inference for an Unknown Number of Attributes in Restricted Latent Class Models.受限潜在类别模型中未知属性数量的贝叶斯推断
Psychometrika. 2023 Jun;88(2):613-635. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09900-7. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
2
Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models.学习认知诊断模型中的潜在和层次结构。
Psychometrika. 2023 Mar;88(1):175-207. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09867-5. Epub 2022 May 20.
3
Data-driven Q-matrix learning based on Boolean matrix factorization in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
认知诊断评估中基于布尔矩阵分解的数据驱动Q矩阵学习
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2022 Nov;75(3):638-667. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12271. Epub 2022 May 16.
4
Learning Large Q-Matrix by Restricted Boltzmann Machines.通过受限玻尔兹曼机学习大 Q 矩阵。
Psychometrika. 2022 Sep;87(3):1010-1041. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09828-4. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
5
Exploratory Restricted Latent Class Models with Monotonicity Requirements under PÒLYA-GAMMA Data Augmentation.基于 PÒLYA-GAMMA 数据增强的具有单调性要求的探索性受限潜在类别模型。
Psychometrika. 2022 Sep;87(3):903-945. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09815-9. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
6
An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model.多选项 G-DINA 模型的实证 Q 矩阵验证方法。
Psychometrika. 2022 Jun;87(2):693-724. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09821-x. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
7
Inferring the Number of Attributes for the Exploratory DINA Model.推断探索性 DINA 模型的属性数量。
Psychometrika. 2021 Mar;86(1):30-64. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09750-9. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
8
Balancing fit and parsimony to improve Q-matrix validation.平衡拟合度和简约度以改进 Q 矩阵验证。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2021 Jul;74 Suppl 1:110-130. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12228. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
9
Improving Robustness in Q-Matrix Validation Using an Iterative and Dynamic Procedure.使用迭代动态程序提高Q矩阵验证的稳健性。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2020 Sep;44(6):431-446. doi: 10.1177/0146621620909904. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
10
Reconsidering Cutoff Points in the General Method of Empirical Q-Matrix Validation.重新审视经验性Q矩阵验证通用方法中的截止点
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Aug;79(4):727-753. doi: 10.1177/0013164418822700. Epub 2019 Jan 10.