• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与耐淹的低地水稻(‘FR13A’)相比,旱稻(‘通陆3号’)幼苗对完全淹水的生理和分子反应。

Physiological and molecular responses of seedlings of an upland rice ('Tung Lu 3') to total submergence compared to those of a submergence-tolerant lowland rice ('FR13A').

作者信息

Yang Si-Yu, Wu Yu-Sian, Chen Chung-Tse, Lai Ming-Hsin, Yen Hsing-Mu, Yang Chin-Ying

机构信息

Department of Agronomy, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan.

Graduate Institute of Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan.

出版信息

Rice (N Y). 2017 Aug 31;10(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12284-017-0180-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12284-017-0180-3
PMID:28861748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5578945/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding the responses of rice to environmental stresses such as unscheduled submergence is of pressing important owing to increasing severity of weather thought to arise from global climate change. When rice is completely submerged, different types adopt either a quiescence survival strategy (i.e., minimal shoot elongation) or an escape strategy (i.e., enhanced shoot elongation). Each strategy can prolong survival depending on the circumstances. While submergence responses have been studied in rice typical of lowland and flood-prone areas, few studies have explored the physiological and molecular properties of upland rice under submergence. Here, we use seedlings of the upland rice 'Tung Lu 3' ('TL3') to analyze physiological and molecular responses to submergence. We compare them with those of 'FR13A', a lowland rice that tolerates submergence by adopting the quiescence strategy.

RESULTS

Plant height and distance between leaf sheaths, increased rapidly in 'TL3' under submergence. Although this indicated a strong escape strategy the seedlings remained totally underwater for the duration of the experiments. In contrast, 'FR13A' elongated much less. Consequently, after 4 days complete submergence followed by drainage, 'TL3' lodged much more severely than 'FR13A'. After 10 d complete submergence, 55% of 'TL3' seedlings survived compared to 100% in 'FR13A'. Chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll concentrations of the 2 oldest leaves of 'TL3' were also significantly above those of 'FR13A' (but were lower than 'FR13A' in the 3 oldest leaves) and less hydrogen peroxide accumulated in 'TL3'. Peroxidase activity in submerged 'TL3' was also greater than in 'FR13A' 1 day after submergence. Quantitative RT-PCR showed increased expression of sucrose synthase 1 and alcohol dehydrogenases 1 after 2 days complete submergence with significantly higher levels in 'TL3' compared to 'FR13A'. Expression was also higher in 'TL3' under non-submerged conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The upland rice line 'TL3' gave a stronger elongation response than 'FR13A' to complete submergence. This escape strategy is widely considered to prejudice survival when the plant remains totally submerged. However, contrary to expectations, 'TL3' survival rates were substantial although below those for 'FR13A' while physiological, biochemical and molecular parameters linked to adaptation differed in detail but appeared to be broadly comparable. These findings highlight that submergence tolerance is determine not only by the adoption of quiescence or escape strategies but maybe by metabolic and physiological properties unrelated to the underwater elongation rate.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0233/5578945/c7c8bfc079db/12284_2017_180_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0233/5578945/de8fbf8a985f/12284_2017_180_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0233/5578945/234ec3ab05c2/12284_2017_180_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0233/5578945/187b2b650eb7/12284_2017_180_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0233/5578945/23917b5aef3c/12284_2017_180_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0233/5578945/c7c8bfc079db/12284_2017_180_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0233/5578945/de8fbf8a985f/12284_2017_180_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0233/5578945/234ec3ab05c2/12284_2017_180_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0233/5578945/187b2b650eb7/12284_2017_180_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0233/5578945/23917b5aef3c/12284_2017_180_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0233/5578945/c7c8bfc079db/12284_2017_180_Fig5_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

鉴于全球气候变化导致天气状况愈发恶劣,了解水稻对诸如意外淹水等环境胁迫的响应至关重要。当水稻完全被淹没时,不同类型的水稻会采取静止存活策略(即最小化地上部分伸长)或逃避策略(即增强地上部分伸长)。每种策略都可根据具体情况延长存活时间。虽然已经对典型的低地和易涝地区水稻的淹水响应进行了研究,但很少有研究探讨淹水条件下旱稻的生理和分子特性。在此,我们使用旱稻品种‘通陆3号’(‘TL3’)的幼苗来分析其对淹水的生理和分子响应。我们将其与‘FR13A’进行比较,‘FR13A’是一种通过采取静止策略来耐受淹水的低地水稻。

结果

淹水条件下,‘TL3’的株高和叶鞘间距迅速增加。尽管这表明其具有强烈的逃避策略,但在整个实验期间幼苗仍完全处于水下。相比之下,‘FR13A’的伸长幅度要小得多。因此,在完全淹水4天后排水,‘TL3’的倒伏情况比‘FR13A’严重得多。完全淹水10天后,‘TL3’幼苗的存活率为55%,而‘FR13A’为100%。‘TL3’最老的两片叶子的叶绿素a、b和总叶绿素浓度也显著高于‘FR13A’(但最老的三片叶子中的浓度低于‘FR13A’),且‘TL3’中积累的过氧化氢较少。淹水1天后,淹水的‘TL3’中的过氧化物酶活性也高于‘FR13A’。定量逆转录聚合酶链反应显示,完全淹水2天后,蔗糖合酶1和乙醇脱氢酶1的表达增加,‘TL3’中的水平显著高于‘FR13A’。在非淹水条件下,‘TL3’中的表达也较高。

结论

旱稻品系‘TL3’对完全淹水的伸长响应比‘FR13A’更强。当植株完全被淹没时,这种逃避策略通常被认为不利于存活。然而,与预期相反,‘TL3’虽然存活率低于‘FR13A’,但仍相当可观,而与适应相关的生理、生化和分子参数虽细节不同,但总体上似乎具有可比性。这些发现表明,耐淹性不仅取决于采取静止或逃避策略,还可能取决于与水下伸长率无关的代谢和生理特性。

相似文献

1
Physiological and molecular responses of seedlings of an upland rice ('Tung Lu 3') to total submergence compared to those of a submergence-tolerant lowland rice ('FR13A').与耐淹的低地水稻(‘FR13A’)相比,旱稻(‘通陆3号’)幼苗对完全淹水的生理和分子反应。
Rice (N Y). 2017 Aug 31;10(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12284-017-0180-3.
2
Distinct mechanisms for aerenchyma formation in leaf sheaths of rice genotypes displaying a quiescence or escape strategy for flooding tolerance.在表现出休眠或逃避策略以耐受水淹的水稻基因型的叶鞘中,通气组织形成的不同机制。
Ann Bot. 2011 Jun;107(8):1335-43. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr086. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
3
Gas film retention and underwater photosynthesis during field submergence of four contrasting rice genotypes.四种不同水稻基因型田间淹水期间的气膜滞留和水下光合作用
J Exp Bot. 2014 Jul;65(12):3225-33. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru166. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
4
Ethylene signaling involves in seeds germination upon submergence and antioxidant response elicited confers submergence tolerance to rice seedlings.乙烯信号传导参与种子在淹水时的萌发,引发的抗氧化反应赋予水稻幼苗耐淹性。
Rice (N Y). 2019 Apr 11;12(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12284-019-0284-z.
5
Morphological and physiological responses of rice seedlings to complete submergence (flash flooding).水稻幼苗对完全淹没(骤发洪水)的形态和生理响应。
Ann Bot. 2009 Jan;103(2):161-9. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn171. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
6
Physiological basis of tolerance to complete submergence in rice involves genetic factors in addition to the SUB1 gene.耐淹性的生理基础除了 SUB1 基因外,还涉及到遗传因素。
AoB Plants. 2014 Oct 3;6:plu060. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plu060.
7
Physiological and antioxidant responses associated with gene introgressed rice ( L.) lines under complete submergence.完全淹水条件下基因渐渗水稻(L.)品系的生理和抗氧化反应。
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2023 Nov;29(11):1763-1776. doi: 10.1007/s12298-023-01400-x. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
8
Diallel analysis of submergence tolerance in rice, Oryza sativa L.水稻耐淹性的双列分析,Oryza sativa L.
Theor Appl Genet. 1985 Aug;70(5):467-73. doi: 10.1007/BF00305978.
9
[Effects of exogenous growth regulators on plant elongation and carbohydrate consumption of rice seedlings under submergence.].[外源生长调节剂对淹水条件下水稻幼苗植株伸长和碳水化合物消耗的影响。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Jan;29(1):149-157. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201801.021.
10
Genetics, Physiological Mechanisms and Breeding of Flood-Tolerant Rice (Oryza sativa L.).耐洪水稻(Oryza sativa L.)的遗传学、生理机制与育种
Plant Cell Physiol. 2017 Feb 1;58(2):185-197. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcw206.

引用本文的文献

1
Future flooding tolerant rice germplasm: Resilience afforded beyond Sub1A gene.未来耐洪水稻种质:超越Sub1A基因所提供的抗性
Plant Genome. 2025 Jun;18(2):e70040. doi: 10.1002/tpg2.70040.
2
Physiological responses and Ethylene-Response AP2/ERF Factor expression in Indica rice seedlings subjected to submergence and osmotic stress.遭受淹水和渗透胁迫的籼稻幼苗的生理反应和乙烯响应 AP2/ERF 因子表达。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Jul 27;23(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04380-y.
3
Flooding tolerance in Rice: adaptive mechanism and marker-assisted selection breeding approaches.

本文引用的文献

1
Review: Mechanisms of anoxia tolerance in plants. I. Growth, survival and anaerobic catabolism.综述:植物耐缺氧机制。I. 生长、存活与无氧分解代谢
Funct Plant Biol. 2003 Mar;30(3):353. doi: 10.1071/PP98095_ER.
2
Physiological Responses and Expression Profile of NADPH Oxidase in Rice (Oryza Sativa) Seedlings under Different Levels of Submergence.不同淹水水平下水稻(Oryza Sativa)幼苗中NADPH氧化酶的生理反应及表达谱
Rice (N Y). 2016 Dec;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12284-016-0074-9. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
3
The roots of future rice harvests.
水稻的耐淹性:适应机制与标记辅助选择育种方法
Mol Biol Rep. 2023 Mar;50(3):2795-2812. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07853-9. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
4
Submergence Gene Transfer into Drought-Tolerant Rice DT3 Using Marker-Assisted Selection.利用标记辅助选择将淹没基因转入耐旱水稻 DT3。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Dec 13;22(24):13365. doi: 10.3390/ijms222413365.
5
Silicon Enhances Plant Resistance of Rice against Submergence Stress.硅增强水稻对淹水胁迫的抗性。
Plants (Basel). 2021 Apr 14;10(4):767. doi: 10.3390/plants10040767.
6
Snorkeling Strategy: Tolerance to Flooding in Rice and Potential Application for Weed Management. snorkeling 策略:水稻耐淹性及其在杂草管理中的潜在应用。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Aug 22;11(9):975. doi: 10.3390/genes11090975.
7
The Seedlings of Different Rice Varieties Exhibit Differ Physiological Properties to Modulate Plant Survival Rates under Submergence Stress.不同水稻品种的幼苗在淹水胁迫下表现出不同的生理特性以调节植株存活率。
Plants (Basel). 2020 Aug 3;9(8):982. doi: 10.3390/plants9080982.
8
Leaf photosynthesis and antioxidant response in selected traditional rice landraces of Jeypore tract of Odisha, India to submergence.印度奥里萨邦杰布尔地区部分传统水稻地方品种对淹水的叶片光合作用和抗氧化反应
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2019 Jul;25(4):847-863. doi: 10.1007/s12298-019-00671-7. Epub 2019 May 18.
9
Ethylene signaling involves in seeds germination upon submergence and antioxidant response elicited confers submergence tolerance to rice seedlings.乙烯信号传导参与种子在淹水时的萌发,引发的抗氧化反应赋予水稻幼苗耐淹性。
Rice (N Y). 2019 Apr 11;12(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12284-019-0284-z.
未来水稻丰收的根基。
Rice (N Y). 2014 Dec;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12284-014-0029-y. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
4
Physiological basis of tolerance to complete submergence in rice involves genetic factors in addition to the SUB1 gene.耐淹性的生理基础除了 SUB1 基因外,还涉及到遗传因素。
AoB Plants. 2014 Oct 3;6:plu060. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plu060.
5
Physiological analyses of traits associated with tolerance of long-term partial submergence in rice.与水稻耐长期部分淹水相关性状的生理学分析。
AoB Plants. 2014 Sep 30;6:plu058. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plu058.
6
Metabolic and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms underlying the anoxic adaptation of rice coleoptile.水稻胚根适应缺氧的代谢和转录调控机制。
AoB Plants. 2014 Jun 3;6:plu026. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plu026.
7
Hydrogen peroxide controls transcriptional responses of ERF73/HRE1 and ADH1 via modulation of ethylene signaling during hypoxic stress.过氧化氢在缺氧胁迫期间通过调节乙烯信号传导来控制ERF73/HRE1和ADH1的转录反应。
Planta. 2014 Apr;239(4):877-85. doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-2020-z. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
8
The AP2/ERF transcription factor AtERF73/HRE1 modulates ethylene responses during hypoxia in Arabidopsis.AP2/ERF转录因子AtERF73/HRE1在拟南芥缺氧期间调节乙烯反应。
Plant Physiol. 2011 May;156(1):202-12. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.172486. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
9
Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants.作物非生物胁迫耐受中的活性氧和抗氧化机制。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010 Dec;48(12):909-30. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
10
Stunt or elongate? Two opposite strategies by which rice adapts to floods.胁迫还是伸长?水稻适应洪水的两种相反策略。
J Plant Res. 2010 May;123(3):303-9. doi: 10.1007/s10265-010-0332-7. Epub 2010 Mar 31.