Division of Clinical Psychiatry Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Neuroscience Centre Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Psychophysiology. 2018 Feb;55(2). doi: 10.1111/psyp.12986. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
Skin conductance responses (SCR) are increasingly analyzed with model-based approaches that assume a linear and time-invariant (LTI) mapping from sudomotor nerve (SN) activity to observed SCR. These LTI assumptions have previously been validated indirectly, by quantifying how much variance in SCR elicited by sensory stimulation is explained under an LTI model. This approach, however, collapses sources of variability in the nervous and effector organ systems. Here, we directly focus on the SN/SCR mapping by harnessing two invasive methods. In an intraneural recording experiment, we simultaneously track SN activity and SCR. This allows assessing the SN/SCR relationship but possibly suffers from interfering activity of non-SN sympathetic fibers. In an intraneural stimulation experiment under regional anesthesia, such influences are removed. In this stimulation experiment, about 95% of SCR variance is explained under LTI assumptions when stimulation frequency is below 0.6 Hz. At higher frequencies, nonlinearities occur. In the intraneural recording experiment, explained SCR variance is lower, possibly indicating interference from non-SN fibers, but higher than in our previous indirect tests. We conclude that LTI systems may not only be a useful approximation but in fact a rather accurate description of biophysical reality in the SN/SCR system, under conditions of low baseline activity and sporadic external stimuli. Intraneural stimulation under regional anesthesia is the most sensitive method to address this question.
皮肤电反应 (SCR) 越来越多地采用基于模型的方法进行分析,这些方法假设从汗腺神经 (SN) 活动到观察到的 SCR 之间存在线性和时不变 (LTI) 的映射。这些 LTI 假设之前已经通过量化感觉刺激引起的 SCR 中的多少方差可以在 LTI 模型下得到解释来间接验证。然而,这种方法会使神经和效应器系统的变异性源崩溃。在这里,我们通过利用两种侵入性方法直接关注 SN/SCR 映射。在神经内记录实验中,我们同时跟踪 SN 活动和 SCR。这允许评估 SN/SCR 关系,但可能会受到非 SN 交感神经纤维的干扰活动的影响。在区域麻醉下的神经内刺激实验中,这种影响被消除。在这种刺激实验中,当刺激频率低于 0.6 Hz 时,约 95%的 SCR 方差可以在 LTI 假设下得到解释。在更高的频率下,会出现非线性。在神经内记录实验中,解释的 SCR 方差较低,可能表示存在来自非 SN 纤维的干扰,但高于我们之前的间接测试。我们得出结论,LTI 系统不仅可能是一种有用的近似,而且实际上是 SN/SCR 系统中生物物理现实的相当准确的描述,在基线活动低和外部刺激偶发的情况下。区域麻醉下的神经内刺激是解决这个问题最敏感的方法。