• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服抗凝药物使用与心房颤动患者心血管结局的性别特异性关联。

Sex-Specific Associations of Oral Anticoagulant Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Roy and Lucille J. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.

Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 18;6(8):e006381. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006381.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.117.006381
PMID:28862952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5586467/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sex-specific effectiveness of rivaroxaban (RIVA), dabigatran (DABI), and warfarin in reducing myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and all-cause mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation are not known. We assessed sex-specific associations of RIVA, DABI, or warfarin use with the risk of MI, HF, and all-cause mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Medicare beneficiaries (men: 65 734 [44.8%], women: 81 135 [55.2%]) with atrial fibrillation who initiated oral anticoagulants formed the study cohort. Inpatient admissions for MI, HF, and all-cause mortality were compared between the 3 drugs separately for men and women using 3-way propensity-matched samples. In men, RIVA use was associated with a reduced risk of MI admissions compared with warfarin use (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 [0.38-0.91]), with a trend towards reduced risk compared with DABI use (0.67 [0.44-1.01]). In women, there were no significant differences in the risk of MI admissions across all 3 anticoagulants. In both sexes, RIVA use and DABI use were associated with reduced risk of HF admissions (men: RIVA; 0.75 [0.63-0.89], DABI; 0.81 [0.69-0.96]) (women: RIVA; 0.64 [0.56-0.74], DABI; 0.73 [0.63-0.83]) and all-cause mortality (men: RIVA; 0.66 [0.53-0.81], DABI; 0.75 [0.61-0.93]) (women: RIVA; 0.76 [0.63-0.91], DABI; 0.77 [0.64-0.93]) compared with warfarin use.

CONCLUSIONS

RIVA use and DABI use when compared with warfarin use was associated with a reduced risk of HF admissions and all-cause mortality in both sexes. However, reduced risk of MI admissions noted with RIVA use appears to be limited to men.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚利伐沙班(RIVA)、达比加群(DABI)和华法林在降低房颤患者心肌梗死(MI)、心力衰竭(HF)和全因死亡率方面的性别特异性疗效。我们评估了 RIVA、DABI 或华法林的使用与房颤患者的 MI、HF 和全因死亡率风险之间的性别特异性关联。

方法和结果

这项研究纳入了使用口服抗凝剂的 Medicare 受益人群(男性:65734 例[44.8%],女性:81135 例[55.2%])。分别在男性和女性中,使用三向倾向匹配样本,比较了 3 种药物在住院治疗 MI、HF 和全因死亡率方面的差异。与华法林相比,男性使用 RIVA 可降低 MI 住院风险(风险比[95%置信区间(CI)]:0.59 [0.38-0.91]),与 DABI 相比,也有降低风险的趋势(0.67 [0.44-1.01])。在女性中,3 种抗凝药物的 MI 住院风险无显著差异。在两性中,RIVA 和 DABI 的使用与 HF 住院风险降低相关(男性:RIVA,0.75 [0.63-0.89],DABI,0.81 [0.69-0.96])(女性:RIVA,0.64 [0.56-0.74],DABI,0.73 [0.63-0.83])和全因死亡率(男性:RIVA,0.66 [0.53-0.81],DABI,0.75 [0.61-0.93])(女性:RIVA,0.76 [0.63-0.91],DABI,0.77 [0.64-0.93])相比,华法林的使用。

结论

与华法林相比,RIVA 和 DABI 的使用与两性 HF 住院和全因死亡率降低相关。然而,RIVA 降低 MI 住院风险的效果似乎仅限于男性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6790/5586467/44d4a10f6fec/JAH3-6-e006381-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6790/5586467/d377bdefa93e/JAH3-6-e006381-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6790/5586467/e770b9661763/JAH3-6-e006381-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6790/5586467/44d4a10f6fec/JAH3-6-e006381-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6790/5586467/d377bdefa93e/JAH3-6-e006381-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6790/5586467/e770b9661763/JAH3-6-e006381-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6790/5586467/44d4a10f6fec/JAH3-6-e006381-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex-Specific Associations of Oral Anticoagulant Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.口服抗凝药物使用与心房颤动患者心血管结局的性别特异性关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 18;6(8):e006381. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006381.
2
Sex-Specific Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation.口服抗凝剂在新诊断房颤老年患者中的性别特异性比较疗效
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003418.
3
Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin or dabigatran for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.利伐沙班与华法林或达比加群治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的比较疗效
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Sep 6;17(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0672-5.
4
Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in the Oldest Adults with Atrial Fibrillation in Taiwan.台湾高龄心房颤动患者中达比加群、利伐沙班和华法林的应用
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Aug;66(8):1567-1574. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15430. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
5
Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗美国国防部人群中未经治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的有效性和安全性比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1116-1.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Novel Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Medicare Beneficiaries With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease.新型口服抗凝剂与华法林在 Medicare 福利受益人群伴心房颤动和心脏瓣膜病中的安全性和疗效。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 5;7(8):e008773. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008773.
7
Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in older adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and heart failure.口服抗凝剂在老年非瓣膜性心房颤动合并心力衰竭患者中的有效性和安全性。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 25;14(3):e0213614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213614. eCollection 2019.
8
Treatment with direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin and the risk for incident diabetes among patients with atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort study.直接口服抗凝剂或华法林治疗与房颤患者新发糖尿病风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Mar 25;20(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01263-0.
9
Comparisons between Oral Anticoagulants among Older Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients.老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的口服抗凝剂比较。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Aug;67(8):1662-1671. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15956. Epub 2019 May 21.
10
Effectiveness and safety of reduced dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: propensity weighted nationwide cohort study.低剂量非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药与华法林在房颤患者中的有效性和安全性:倾向评分加权的全国队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Feb 10;356:j510. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j510.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes and factors associated with mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure: FARAONIC study.心房颤动合并心力衰竭患者的死亡率及相关因素:FARAONIC 研究。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Nov;46(11):1390-1397. doi: 10.1002/clc.24106. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
[Cardiac rehabilitation in LVAD patients : Aspects regarding exercise and rhythm].左心室辅助装置患者的心脏康复:运动与节律相关方面
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2023 Mar;34(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s00399-022-00914-3. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
3
Treatment with direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin and the risk for incident diabetes among patients with atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex-Specific Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation.口服抗凝剂在新诊断房颤老年患者中的性别特异性比较疗效
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003418.
2
Causes of Death in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.抗凝治疗的心房颤动患者的死亡原因。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Dec 13;68(23):2508-2521. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.944.
3
Discordance between ICD-Coded Myocardial Infarction and Diagnosis according to the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.
直接口服抗凝剂或华法林治疗与房颤患者新发糖尿病风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Mar 25;20(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01263-0.
4
Assessment of Outcomes of Treatment With Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis.评估伴有多种慢性疾病的心房颤动患者口服抗凝治疗的结局:一项比较有效性分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182870. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2870.
国际疾病分类(ICD)编码的心肌梗死与依据心肌梗死通用定义所做诊断之间的不一致性。
Clin Chem. 2017 Jan;63(1):415-419. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.263764. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
4
Stroke, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries Treated With Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.老年 Medicare 受益人群非瓣膜性房颤应用达比加群或利伐沙班治疗后的卒中、出血和死亡风险。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Nov 1;176(11):1662-1671. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5954.
5
Thromboembolic, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks of Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran in Asians With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.亚洲非瓣膜性心房颤动患者使用利伐沙班和达比加群的血栓栓塞、出血和死亡率风险。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 27;68(13):1389-1401. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.062.
6
Atrial Fibrillation and Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Appraisal of Pathophysiologic Mechanisms.心房颤动与心肌梗死:病理生理机制的系统评价与评估
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 20;5(5):e003347. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003347.
7
Cause of Death and Predictors of All-Cause Mortality in Anticoagulated Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Data From ROCKET AF.非瓣膜性心房颤动抗凝治疗患者的死亡原因及全因死亡率预测因素:来自ROCKET AF研究的数据
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Mar 8;5(3):e002197. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002197.
8
Rationale and design of a randomized, double-blind, event-driven, multicentre study comparing the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban with placebo for reducing the risk of death, myocardial infarction or stroke in subjects with heart failure and significant coronary artery disease following an exacerbation of heart failure: the COMMANDER HF trial.一项随机、双盲、事件驱动、多中心研究的原理与设计,该研究比较口服利伐沙班与安慰剂在降低心力衰竭加重后伴有严重冠状动脉疾病的心力衰竭患者死亡、心肌梗死或卒中风险方面的疗效和安全性:COMMANDER HF试验
Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Jul;17(7):735-42. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.266. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
9
Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran and warfarin in real-world US patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective cohort study.达比加群酯与华法林在美国非瓣膜性心房颤动真实世界患者中的有效性和安全性:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Apr 10;4(4):e001798. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001798.
10
2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2014 Dec 23;130(25):e344-426. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000134. Epub 2014 Sep 23.