Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Breast. 2020 Dec;54:203-210. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
One year of adjuvant trastuzumab is considered the standard treatment for patients with HER2 positive breast cancer. However, a shorter duration of trastuzumab may be associated with reduced costs and side effects. Results from randomized trials with diverse non-inferiority margins comparing one year to a shorter duration of adjuvant trastuzumab are not consistent and have not been systematically reviewed using a non-inferiority meta-analysis approach. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials to assess whether a shorter duration of adjuvant trastuzumab was non-inferior to one year of treatment or not. The non-inferiority margin for the meta-analysis was pre-defined as the median of the margins of all the trials included. Data of 11,376 patients from 5 trials were analyzed. Non-inferiority margins in included studies varied from 1.15 to 1.53 with median of 1.29 for HR of DFS. A shorter duration of trastuzumab was non-inferior to one year of therapy for DFS (HR 1.13, 95%CI 1.03-1.24) but inconclusive for OS (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.00-1.30). In a subgroup analysis for DFS outcome, shorter therapy was non-inferior in patients with ER positive disease (HR 1.10, 95%CI 0.95-1.28) and those with sequential therapy (HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.75-1.27) and when the duration of treatment was 6 months (HR 1.09, 95%CI 0.98-1.22). Although a shorter duration of adjuvant trastuzumab was non-inferior to one year of therapy for DFS in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer based on our HR margin of 1.29, any benefit of a shorter duration comes at a loss of efficacy with an increase in absolute risk up to 3.9% for 5 year DFS. Whether the potential increased risk is clinically acceptable for the benefits of a shorter duration remains debatable.
一年的曲妥珠单抗辅助治疗被认为是 HER2 阳性乳腺癌患者的标准治疗。然而,曲妥珠单抗的治疗时间较短可能与降低成本和减少副作用有关。使用非劣效性荟萃分析方法对比较一年与较短时间辅助曲妥珠单抗治疗的随机试验进行的系统评价结果并不一致,也没有进行系统评价。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估较短时间的辅助曲妥珠单抗治疗是否不劣于一年的治疗。荟萃分析的非劣效性边界预先定义为纳入所有试验的边界中位数。对来自 5 项试验的 11376 例患者的数据进行了分析。纳入研究的非劣效性边界从 1.15 到 1.53 不等,DFS 的 HR 中位数为 1.29。较短时间的曲妥珠单抗治疗在 DFS 方面不劣于一年的治疗(HR 1.13,95%CI 1.03-1.24),但在 OS 方面无定论(HR 1.14,95%CI 1.00-1.30)。在 DFS 结果的亚组分析中,较短的治疗在 ER 阳性疾病患者(HR 1.10,95%CI 0.95-1.28)和序贯治疗患者(HR 0.97,95%CI 0.75-1.27)以及治疗持续时间为 6 个月时(HR 1.09,95%CI 0.98-1.22)不劣于一年的治疗。虽然根据我们的 HR 边界 1.29,较短时间的辅助曲妥珠单抗治疗在 HER2 阳性乳腺癌患者中不劣于一年的治疗,但任何较短时间的益处都伴随着疗效的降低,5 年 DFS 的绝对风险增加了 3.9%。对于较短时间治疗的潜在风险增加,其是否在临床上可以接受,仍存在争议。