• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产婆在进行产妇观察和升级关注时的体验:一项焦点小组研究。

Midwives' experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns: a focus group study.

机构信息

Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.

School of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 2;17(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1472-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-017-1472-8
PMID:28865442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5581429/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For the past decade, Maternal Mortality Reports, published in the United Kingdom every three years, have consistently raised concerns about maternal observations in maternity care. The reports identify that observations are not being done, not being completed fully, are not recorded on Early Warning Score systems, and/or are not escalated appropriately. This has resulted in delays in referral, intervention and increases the risk of maternal morbidity or mortality. However there has been little exploration of the possible reasons for non-completion of maternal observations.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to explore midwives' experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns in rural and urban maternity settings in the West Midlands of England. A qualitative design involving a series of six focus groups with midwives and Supervisors of Midwives was employed to investigate the facilitators of, and barriers to the completion of maternal observations.

RESULTS

Eighteen Midwives and 8 Supervisors of Midwives participated in a total of 6 focus groups. Three key themes emerged from the data: (1) Organisation of Maternal Observations (including delegation of tasks to Midwifery Support Workers, variation in their training, the care model used e.g. one to one care, and staffing issues); (2) Prioritisation of Maternal Observations (including the role of professional judgement and concerns expressed by midwives that they did not feel equipped to care for women with complex clinical needs; and (3) Negotiated Escalation (including the inappropriate response from senior staff to use of Modified Early Warning Score systems, and the emotional impact of escalation).

CONCLUSIONS

A number of organisational and cultural barriers exist to the completion of maternal observations and the escalation of concerns. In order to address these the following actions are recommended: standardised training for Midwifery Support Workers, review of training of midwives to ensure it addresses the increasing complexity of the maternal population, identification and agreement regarding the organisation of maternal observations among staff, an emphasis on increasing the priority placed on maternal observations in all clinical settings, and clarification and reinforcement of escalation procedures for both midwives and senior clinicians.

摘要

背景

在过去的十年中,英国每三年发布一次的《孕产妇死亡率报告》持续对产妇护理中的观察问题表示担忧。报告指出,观察工作未完成、未全面完成、未记录在早期预警评分系统中、/或未得到适当升级。这导致了转介、干预的延迟,并增加了产妇发病率或死亡率的风险。然而,对于未完成产妇观察的可能原因,几乎没有进行过探索。

方法

本研究的目的是探讨英格兰西米德兰兹农村和城市产科环境中助产士进行产妇观察和升级问题的经验。采用定性设计,包括与助产士和助产士主管进行的六组焦点小组,以调查完成产妇观察的促进因素和障碍。

结果

共有 18 名助产士和 8 名助产士主管参加了总共 6 个焦点小组。从数据中出现了三个关键主题:(1)产妇观察的组织(包括将任务分配给助产士支持人员、他们培训的差异、所使用的护理模式,如一对一护理、和人员配备问题);(2)产妇观察的优先事项(包括专业判断的作用以及助产士表示他们不具备照顾有复杂临床需求的女性的能力的担忧);和(3)协商升级(包括高级工作人员对使用改良早期预警评分系统的不当反应、以及升级带来的情绪影响)。

结论

完成产妇观察和升级问题存在一些组织和文化障碍。为了解决这些问题,建议采取以下行动:为助产士支持人员提供标准化培训、审查助产士培训以确保其涵盖产妇人群的日益复杂性、在员工中确定并达成产妇观察的组织共识、在所有临床环境中强调增加对产妇观察的重视、以及明确和加强助产士和高级临床医生的升级程序。

相似文献

1
Midwives' experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns: a focus group study.产婆在进行产妇观察和升级关注时的体验:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 2;17(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1472-8.
2
Midwives' experiences of referring obese women to either a community or home-based antenatal weight management service: Implications for service providers and midwifery practice.助产士将肥胖女性转介至社区或居家产前体重管理服务的经历:对服务提供者和助产实践的启示
Midwifery. 2017 Jun;49:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
3
Pregnancy as an ideal time for intervention to address the complex needs of black and minority ethnic women: views of British midwives.怀孕是满足黑人和少数族裔女性复杂需求的理想干预时机:英国助产士的观点。
Midwifery. 2015 Mar;31(3):373-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
4
A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.审视与恐惧的故事:澳大利亚助产士对外科产科服务审查的经历、参与诉讼及其对临床实践的影响。
Midwifery. 2010 Jun;26(3):268-85. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
5
A wall of information? Exploring the public health component of maternity care in England.一堵信息墙?探索英格兰孕产妇保健中的公共卫生组成部分。
Midwifery. 2016 Mar;34:253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.10.013. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
6
Midwives' perceptions of women's preferences related to midwifery care in Germany: A focus group study.德国助产士对女性在助产护理方面偏好的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
Midwifery. 2018 Jun;61:53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
7
Exploring midwives' perception of confidence around facilitating water birth in Western Australia: A qualitative descriptive study.探索西澳大利亚助产士对协助水中分娩的信心认知:一项质性描述性研究。
Midwifery. 2016 Feb;33:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Oct 25.
8
Perceptions of barriers to accessing perinatal mental health care in midwifery: A scoping review.助产领域中获得围产期心理健康护理的障碍认知:一项范围综述。
Midwifery. 2019 Mar;70:106-118. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
9
Assessing mental health during pregnancy: An exploratory qualitative study of midwives' perceptions.评估孕期心理健康:助产士感知的探索性定性研究。
Midwifery. 2020 Jul;86:102690. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102690. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
10
Midwives' experiences of cultural competency training and providing perinatal care for migrant women a mixed methods study: Operational Refugee and Migrant Maternal Approach (ORAMMA) project.助产士文化能力培训经验及为移民妇女提供围产期护理的混合方法研究:运营难民和移民孕产妇方法(ORAMMA)项目。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03799-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Midwives' perspectives about using individualized care plans in the provision of immediate postpartum care in Uganda; an exploratory qualitative study.乌干达助产士对在产后即时护理中使用个性化护理计划的看法;一项探索性定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Sep 22;22(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01512-5.
2
Screening for infectious maternal morbidity - knowledge, attitudes and perceptions among healthcare providers and managers in Malawi: a qualitative study.筛查感染性产妇发病率——马拉维医护人员和管理人员的知识、态度和看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04583-5.
3
Early warning systems in maternity care: protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis of maternity care providers' views and experiences.产科护理中的早期预警系统:关于产科护理提供者观点和经验的定性证据综合分析方案
HRB Open Res. 2021 May 27;4:59. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13270.1. eCollection 2021.
4
An Algorithm (LaD) for Monitoring Childbirth in Settings Where Tracking All Parameters in the World Health Organization Partograph Is Not Feasible: Design and Expert Validation.一种在无法追踪世界卫生组织产程图所有参数的环境中监测分娩的算法(LaD):设计与专家验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 May 27;9(5):e17056. doi: 10.2196/17056.
5
Midwives' experiences of using the Obstetric Norwegian Early Warning System (ONEWS): A national cross-sectional study.助产士使用挪威产科早期预警系统(ONEWS)的经验:一项全国性横断面研究。
Eur J Midwifery. 2021 Apr 22;5:10. doi: 10.18332/ejm/134510. eCollection 2021.
6
Exploring clinicians' perspectives on the 'Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle' national quality improvement programme: a qualitative study.探索临床医生对“产科肛门括约肌损伤护理包”国家质量改进计划的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e035674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035674.
7
Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review.旨在更好地理解母婴保健中的风险选择:系统范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 8;15(6):e0234252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234252. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical user experiences of observation and response charts: focus group findings of using a new format chart incorporating a track and trigger system.临床用户对观察和反应图表的体验:使用新格式图表(包含跟踪和触发系统)的焦点小组研究结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Jan;24(1):65-75. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002777. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
2
Detection and management of the deteriorating ward patient: an evaluation of nursing practice.病房病情恶化患者的检测与管理:护理实践评估
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Jan;24(1-2):173-82. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12655. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
3
A national cross sectional survey of heads of midwifery services of uptake, benefits and barriers to use of obstetric early warning systems (EWS) by midwives.一项关于助产服务负责人对助产士使用产科早期预警系统(EWS)的接受情况、益处及障碍的全国性横断面调查。
Midwifery. 2014 Nov;30(11):1140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.03.016. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
4
A national survey of obstetric early warning systems in the United Kingdom: five years on.英国全国范围内的产科预警系统调查:五年后。
Anaesthesia. 2014 Jul;69(7):687-92. doi: 10.1111/anae.12708. Epub 2014 May 7.
5
Nurses' perceptions of accessing a Medical Emergency Team: a qualitative study.护士对启动医疗应急团队的认知:一项定性研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2014 Aug;27(3):133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
6
Front line nurses' experiences with deteriorating ward patients: a qualitative study.一线护士对病情恶化的病房患者的体验:一项定性研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2013 Dec;60(4):501-9. doi: 10.1111/inr.12061. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
7
Value of a modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS) in managing maternal complications in the peripartum period: an ethnographic study.改良早期预警评分系统(MEOWS)在围产期管理产妇并发症中的价值:一项民族志研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jan;23(1):26-34. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001781. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
8
Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study.母亲年龄与不良妊娠结局:一项队列研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;42(6):634-43. doi: 10.1002/uog.12494.
9
Patterns in the recording of vital signs and early warning scores: compliance with a clinical escalation protocol.生命体征和早期预警评分记录模式:符合临床升级协议。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Sep;22(9):719-26. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001954. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
10
What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service.医院临床人员不遵守规程的原因是什么?对澳大利亚多校区大都市医疗服务机构床边临床人员未能启动快速反应系统的事件发生率及背后因素进行分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):569-75. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000692. Epub 2012 May 23.