Lavelle Fiona, McGowan Laura, Hollywood Lynsey, Surgenor Dawn, McCloat Amanda, Mooney Elaine, Caraher Martin, Raats Monique, Dean Moira
Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 5AG, UK.
Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Sep 2;14(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0575-y.
With the increase use of convenience food and eating outside the home environment being linked to the obesity epidemic, the need to assess and monitor individuals cooking and food skills is key to help intervene where necessary to promote the usage of these skills. Therefore, this research aimed to develop and validate a measure for cooking skills and one for food skills, that are clearly described, relatable, user-friendly, suitable for different types of studies, and applicable across all sociodemographic levels.
Two measures were developed in light of the literature and expert opinion and piloted for clarity and ease of use. Following this, four studies were undertaken across different cohorts (including a sample of students, both 'Food preparation novices' and 'Experienced food preparers', and a nationally representative sample) to assess temporal stability, psychometrics, internal consistency reliability and construct validity of both measures. Analysis included T-tests, Pearson's correlations, factor analysis, and Cronbach's alphas, with a significance level of 0.05.
Both measures were found to have a significant level of temporal stability (P < 0.001). Factor analysis revealed three factors with eigenvalues over 1, with two items in a third factor outside the two suggested measures. The internal consistency reliability for the cooking skills confidence measure ranged from 0.78 to 0.93 across all cohorts. The food skills confidence measure's Cronbach's alpha's ranged from 0.85 to 0.94. The two measures also showed a high discriminate validity as there were significant differences (P < 0.05 for cooking skills confidence and P < 0.01 for food skills confidence) between Food preparation novices' and 'Experienced food preparers.'
The cooking skills confidence measure and the food skills confidence measure have been shown to have a very satisfactory reliability, validity and are consistent over time. Their user-friendly applicability make both measures highly suitable for large scale cross-sectional, longitudinal and intervention studies to assess or monitor cooking and food skills levels and confidence.
随着方便食品的使用增加以及外出就餐与肥胖流行相关联,评估和监测个人烹饪及食物技能对于在必要时进行干预以促进这些技能的使用至关重要。因此,本研究旨在开发并验证一种烹饪技能测量方法和一种食物技能测量方法,这些方法描述清晰、易于理解、用户友好、适用于不同类型的研究且适用于所有社会人口统计学水平。
根据文献和专家意见开发了两种测量方法,并进行了清晰度和易用性的预试验。在此之后,对不同队列(包括学生样本、“食物准备新手”和“有经验的食物准备者”以及全国代表性样本)进行了四项研究,以评估这两种测量方法的时间稳定性、心理测量学、内部一致性信度和结构效度。分析包括T检验、皮尔逊相关性、因子分析和克朗巴哈系数,显著性水平为0.05。
发现这两种测量方法都具有显著的时间稳定性(P < 0.001)。因子分析揭示了三个特征值大于1的因子,第三个因子中有两个项目不在所建议的两种测量方法之内。在所有队列中,烹饪技能信心测量的内部一致性信度范围为0.78至0.93。食物技能信心测量的克朗巴哈系数范围为0.85至0.94。这两种测量方法还显示出较高的区分效度,因为“食物准备新手”和“有经验的食物准备者”之间存在显著差异(烹饪技能信心P < 0.05,食物技能信心P < 0.01)。
烹饪技能信心测量方法和食物技能信心测量方法已被证明具有非常令人满意的信度、效度,并且随时间保持一致。它们用户友好的适用性使这两种测量方法非常适合大规模横断面、纵向和干预研究,以评估或监测烹饪和食物技能水平及信心。