Suppr超能文献

烹饪技能和食物技能评估及其与营养知识、健康饮食态度和食物摄入的关系:德国验证研究的结果。

The Assessment of Cooking Skills and Food Skills and Their Relationship with Nutrition Knowledge, Attitude toward a Healthy Diet and Food Intake: Results of a German Validation Study.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2022 Jul 30;14(15):3157. doi: 10.3390/nu14153157.

Abstract

There is a lack of validated assessment instruments that capture all facets of cooking skills (CS) and food skills (FS). The goal of this study was to validate the German version of a questionnaire to assess a broad range of CS and FS and to examine its relationship with nutrition knowledge, attitude toward a healthy diet, and food intake. The German version was developed using forward−backward translation. An online survey was completed by students (n = 141), participants from the general Swiss population (n = 50), and nutrition experts (n = 18), including the CS and FS items along with nutrition knowledge, food frequency items, attitude toward a healthy diet and sociodemographic variables. The reliability and construct validity were examined. Results: For all of the samples, Cronbach’s alpha was between 0.85 and 0.88 for CS items and between 0.84 and 0.86 for FS items. The scales were strongly correlated (r = 0.60−0.77, p < 0.01). Nutrition experts showed higher confidence in their CS and FS than students and the participants of the general Swiss population (p < 0.001). CS and FS correlated weakly to moderately with practical nutrition knowledge, attitude toward a healthy diet, and the diet quality index. The German version is an efficient, valid, and highly reliable instrument that seems sensitive to changes. FS, compared to CS, might be more important for a healthy diet.

摘要

目前缺乏能够全面评估烹饪技能(CS)和食品技能(FS)的验证评估工具。本研究的目的是验证评估广泛 CS 和 FS 的德国问卷版本,并研究其与营养知识、健康饮食态度和食物摄入量之间的关系。德国问卷版本通过正向-反向翻译法制定。在线调查由学生(n=141)、瑞士普通民众(n=50)和营养专家(n=18)完成,其中包括 CS 和 FS 项目以及营养知识、食物频率项目、健康饮食态度和社会人口学变量。本研究对问卷的信度和结构效度进行了检验。结果:对于所有样本,CS 项目的 Cronbach’s alpha 值在 0.85 到 0.88 之间,FS 项目的 Cronbach’s alpha 值在 0.84 到 0.86 之间。这些量表之间具有强相关性(r=0.60-0.77,p<0.01)。与学生和瑞士普通民众相比,营养专家对 CS 和 FS 的信心更高(p<0.001)。CS 和 FS 与实践营养知识、健康饮食态度和饮食质量指数呈弱至中度相关。德国问卷版本是一种高效、有效且高度可靠的工具,似乎对变化敏感。与 CS 相比,FS 可能对健康饮食更为重要。

相似文献

4
Domestic cooking and food skills: A review.家庭烹饪与食品技能:综述。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Jul 24;57(11):2412-2431. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2015.1072495.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Domestic cooking and food skills: A review.家庭烹饪与食品技能:综述。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Jul 24;57(11):2412-2431. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2015.1072495.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验