• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于尿沉渣分析的真空采血管与非真空采血管的比较。

Comparison of vacuum and non-vacuum urine tubes for urinary sediment analysis.

作者信息

Topcuoglu Canan, Sezer Sevilay, Kosem Arzu, Ercan Mujgan, Turhan Turan

机构信息

a Biochemistry Department , Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital , Ankara , Turkey.

b Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine , Bozok University , Yozgat , Turkey.

出版信息

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2017 Dec;77(8):592-594. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2017.1371324. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1080/00365513.2017.1371324
PMID:28868933
Abstract

Urine collection systems with aspiration system for vacuum tubes are becoming increasingly common for urinalysis, especially for microscopic examination of the urine. In this study, we aimed to examine whether vacuum aspiration of the urine sample has any adverse effect on sediment analysis by comparing results from vacuum and non-vacuum urine tubes. The study included totally 213 urine samples obtained from inpatients and outpatients in our hospital. Urine samples were collected to containers with aspiration system for vacuum tubes. Each sample was aliquoted to both vacuum and non-vacuum urine tubes. Urinary sediment analysis was performed using manual microscope. Results were evaluated using chi-square test. Comparison of the sediment analysis results from vacuum and non-vacuum urine tubes showed that results were highly concordant for erythrocyte, leukocyte and epithelial cells (gamma values 1, 0.997, and 0.994, respectively; p < .001). Results were also concordant for urinary casts, crystals and yeast (kappa values 0.815, 0.945 and 1, respectively; p < .001). The results show that in urinary sediment analysis, vacuum aspiration has no adverse effect on the cellular components except on casts.

摘要

带有真空管抽吸系统的尿液收集系统在尿液分析中越来越普遍,尤其是在尿液显微镜检查方面。在本研究中,我们旨在通过比较真空管和非真空管尿液样本的结果,来检验尿液样本的真空抽吸对沉渣分析是否有任何不利影响。该研究共纳入了从我院住院患者和门诊患者中获取的213份尿液样本。将尿液样本收集到带有真空管抽吸系统的容器中。每个样本均被分装到真空管和非真空管中。使用手动显微镜进行尿沉渣分析。结果采用卡方检验进行评估。真空管和非真空管尿液样本的沉渣分析结果比较显示,红细胞、白细胞和上皮细胞的结果高度一致(γ值分别为1、0.997和0.994;p < .001)。尿管型、结晶和酵母的结果也一致(κ值分别为0.815、0.945和1;p < .001)。结果表明,在尿沉渣分析中,除管型外,真空抽吸对细胞成分没有不利影响。

相似文献

1
Comparison of vacuum and non-vacuum urine tubes for urinary sediment analysis.用于尿沉渣分析的真空采血管与非真空采血管的比较。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2017 Dec;77(8):592-594. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2017.1371324. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
2
Urine transfer devices may impact urinary particle results: a pre-analytical study.尿液转移装置可能会影响尿沉渣结果:一项分析前研究。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Jun 22;61(12):2186-2194. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0327. Print 2023 Nov 27.
3
[Correlation between urinary sediment spectra and pathological patterns of renal biopsies].[尿沉渣光谱与肾活检病理模式之间的相关性]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2014 Dec 18;46(6):920-5.
4
Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting.自动化尿液分析:初步经验以及Iris iQ200尿液显微镜检查系统、Sysmex UF-100流式细胞仪与手工显微镜颗粒计数之间的比较
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(9):1251-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.503.
5
Comparison of five automated urine sediment analyzers with manual microscopy for accurate identification of urine sediment.比较五种自动化尿沉渣分析仪与手工显微镜检查对尿沉渣准确识别的效果。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Oct 25;57(11):1744-1753. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0211.
6
Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy.尿沉渣检查:自动尿液分析系统与手工显微镜检查的比较
Clin Chim Acta. 2007 Sep;384(1-2):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 May 26.
7
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of two automated urine sediment analyzers with manual phase-contrast microscopy.两种自动化尿液沉渣分析仪与人工相差显微镜检查的诊断性能比较。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jan 28;58(2):268-273. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0919.
8
Optimal criteria for microscopic review of urinalysis following use of automated urine analyzer.使用自动尿液分析仪后进行尿液分析的显微镜检查的最佳标准。
Clin Chim Acta. 2015 Jan 15;439:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.09.027. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
9
The comparison of automated urine analyzers with manual microscopic examination for urinalysis automated urine analyzers and manual urinalysis.自动尿液分析仪与手工显微镜检查用于尿液分析的比较:自动尿液分析仪与手工尿液分析
Pract Lab Med. 2016 Mar 11;5:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2016.03.002. eCollection 2016 Aug 1.
10
UriSed - Preliminary reference intervals and optimal method for urine sediment analysis in newborns and infants.UriSed——新生儿和婴儿尿液沉渣分析的初步参考区间及最佳方法。
Clin Biochem. 2016 Aug;49(12):909-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A Microfluidic Detection System for Bladder Cancer Tumor Cells.一种用于膀胱癌肿瘤细胞的微流控检测系统。
Micromachines (Basel). 2019 Dec 11;10(12):871. doi: 10.3390/mi10120871.