Purnak Tugrul, Efe Cumali, Kav Taylan, Wahlin Staffan, Ozaslan Ersan
Department of Gastroenterology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Hepatology Division, Centre for Digestive Disease, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Oct;62(10):2900-2907. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4728-2. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
Beyond available guidelines, therapy of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) shows wide variation among physicians. We compared two regimens for treatment naive AIH: one recommended protocol with an initial prednisolone dose of 30 mg/day and our own 40 mg/day prednisolone with a slow dose tapering protocol. We analyzed the safety, response rates, and outcomes for two groups of treated patients.
We retrospectively evaluated data of 71 AIH patients including, group I (n = 32, prednisone 30 mg/day) and group II (n = 39, prednisone 40 mg/day). All patients also received azathioprine.
The frequency of complete biochemical response was significantly higher in group II than in group I (69.2 vs. 43.8%, p = 0.031) after 3 months of therapy, but not after 6 and 12 months (79.5 vs. 59.4%, p = 0.065 and 89.5 vs. 80.6%, p = 0.30). In patients with severe interface hepatitis, the complete response rates were significantly higher in group II than in group I after 3 (63.6 vs. 23.1%, p = 0.02) and 6 months (72.7 vs. 38.5%, p = 0.046), but not after 12 months of therapy (86.4 vs. 69.2%, p = 0.221). Relapses were observed in 50% of group I and in 35.9% of group II during maintenance therapy (p = 0.23). Overall survival was significantly better in group II than in group I (100 vs. 87.5%, log-rank, p = 0.048). No severe steroid-related side effects were observed in either group.
Our real-world experience suggests that an initial prednisolone dose of 40 mg/day with a slower tapering protocol induces earlier biochemical response, tends to result in less relapses during maintenance, and is associated with a better disease outcome.
除现有指南外,自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)的治疗在医生之间差异很大。我们比较了两种针对初治AIH的治疗方案:一种是推荐方案,初始泼尼松龙剂量为30mg/天,另一种是我们自己采用的泼尼松龙40mg/天并缓慢减量的方案。我们分析了两组治疗患者的安全性、缓解率和治疗结果。
我们回顾性评估了71例AIH患者的数据,包括I组(n = 32,泼尼松30mg/天)和II组(n = 39,泼尼松40mg/天)。所有患者均同时接受硫唑嘌呤治疗。
治疗3个月后,II组的完全生化缓解频率显著高于I组(69.2%对43.8%,p = 0.031),但6个月和12个月后差异无统计学意义(79.5%对59.4%,p = 0.065;89.5%对80.6%,p = 0.30)。在重度界面性肝炎患者中,治疗3个月(63.6%对23.1%,p = 0.02)和6个月后(72.7%对38.5%,p = 0.046),II组的完全缓解率显著高于I组,但治疗12个月后差异无统计学意义(86.4%对69.2%,p = 0.221)。在维持治疗期间,I组50%的患者和II组35.9%的患者出现复发(p = 0.23)。II组的总生存率显著高于I组(100%对87.5%,对数秩检验,p = 0.048)。两组均未观察到严重的类固醇相关副作用。
我们的实际经验表明,初始泼尼松龙剂量为40mg/天并采用更缓慢的减量方案可诱导更早的生化缓解,在维持治疗期间复发倾向更低,且与更好的疾病转归相关。