Romero-Gavilan F, Sánchez-Pérez A M, Araújo-Gomes N, Azkargorta M, Iloro I, Elortza F, Gurruchaga M, Goñi I, Suay J
a Department of Industrial Systems and Design , Universitat Jaume I , Castellón , Spain.
b Department of Medicine , Universitat Jaume I , Castellón , Spain.
Biofouling. 2017 Sep;33(8):676-689. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2017.1356289.
The interactions of implanted biomaterials with the host organism determine the success or failure of an implantation. Normally, their biocompatibility is assessed using in vitro tests. Unfortunately, in vitro and in vivo results are not always concordant; new, effective methods of biomaterial characterisation are urgently needed to predict the in vivo outcome. As the first layer of proteins adsorbed onto the biomaterial surfaces might condition the host response, mass spectrometry analysis was performed to characterise these proteins. Four distinct hybrid sol-gel biomaterials were tested. The in vitro results were similar for all the materials examined here. However, in vivo, the materials behaved differently. Six of the 171 adsorbed proteins were significantly more abundant on the materials with weak biocompatibility; these proteins are associated with the complement pathway. Thus, protein analysis might be a suitable tool to predict the in vivo outcomes of implantations using newly formulated biomaterials.
植入生物材料与宿主生物体之间的相互作用决定了植入手术的成败。通常,使用体外测试来评估它们的生物相容性。不幸的是,体外和体内结果并不总是一致的;迫切需要新的、有效的生物材料表征方法来预测体内结果。由于吸附在生物材料表面的第一层蛋白质可能会影响宿主反应,因此进行了质谱分析以表征这些蛋白质。测试了四种不同的杂化溶胶-凝胶生物材料。此处检查的所有材料的体外结果相似。然而,在体内,这些材料的表现有所不同。在生物相容性较弱的材料上,171种吸附蛋白中有6种的含量明显更高;这些蛋白质与补体途径有关。因此,蛋白质分析可能是预测使用新配制生物材料进行植入手术体内结果的合适工具。