Bauman Adrian, Chau Josephine
J Phys Act Health. 2009 Nov;6(s2):S196-S210. doi: 10.1123/jpah.6.s2.s196.
This paper reviewed a) mass media campaigns and b) 'new media' interventions to promote physical activity. They are different kinds of interventions, with campaigns being mass-reach communications efforts to increase population awareness of physical activity. 'New media' interventions assess the impact of web-based, internet, other 'new media' and e-mail-delivered interventions to increase physical activity.
Previous reviews of mass media campaigns and 'new media' interventions were assessed, and more recent peer-reviewed publications identified using routine electronic databases. For each area, a framework for interventions was described, and evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions, the main outcomes of interest, and methodological strengths and weaknesses were identified.
For mass media campaigns, key recommendations were to use consistent and well-branded messages, and for campaigns to be integrated across local, State and national levels, with sufficient resources to purchase sufficient media. Mass media campaigns should be subject to rigorous formative, process and impact evaluation. For 'new media' interventions, there is clear evidence of effectiveness, but efforts should be made to increase the reach and generalizability of these interventions. They should be provided as a low cost component of integrated communitywide physical activity programs.
本文回顾了a)大众媒体宣传活动以及b)促进身体活动的“新媒体”干预措施。它们是不同类型的干预措施,宣传活动是旨在提高公众对身体活动认识的大规模传播努力。“新媒体”干预措施评估基于网络、互联网、其他“新媒体”以及电子邮件传递的干预措施对增加身体活动的影响。
对先前关于大众媒体宣传活动和“新媒体”干预措施的综述进行了评估,并使用常规电子数据库识别了更新的同行评审出版物。针对每个领域,描述了干预措施框架,并确定了这些干预措施有效性的证据、主要关注结果以及方法学的优势和劣势。
对于大众媒体宣传活动,主要建议是使用一致且品牌鲜明的信息,宣传活动应在地方、州和国家层面进行整合,并拥有足够资源以购买充足的媒体资源。大众媒体宣传活动应接受严格的形成性、过程性和影响评估。对于“新媒体”干预措施,有明确的有效性证据,但应努力扩大这些干预措施的覆盖面和推广性。它们应作为社区范围内综合身体活动计划的低成本组成部分提供。