Gillette Cordial M, Merrick Mark A
J Sport Rehabil. 2018 Nov 1;27(6):526-529. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2016-0239. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
Ice, compression, and elevation, or ICE, is a widely used treatment for acute musculoskeletal injuries. The effects of ice and compression on tissue temperatures have been established, but whether elevation during cryotherapy affects temperature change has not. Elevation has potential to alter local perfusion and thereby alter the balance of heat loss/heat gain, potentially impacting tissue cooling during cryotherapy.
To measure the effect and interaction of ice, compression, and elevation on intramuscular temperatures. We hypothesized that elevation would not have an effect on intramuscular tissue temperature.
Randomized crossover study design.
University athletic training facility.
A total of 15 healthy volunteers (age 20.93 [1.67] y) provided informed consent and participated.
Participants completed 8 treatment conditions: no treatment (control), ice only (I), compression only (C), elevation only (E), ice and compression (IC), ice and elevation (IE), compression and elevation (CE), or ice, compression, and elevation (ICE). All conditions were tested on each participant with a minimum of 48 hours between each condition. Intramuscular temperatures were recorded every 30 seconds during a 1-minute preapplication, 30-minute treatment, and 20-minute postapplication period.
The temperature difference between the mean treatment temperature and the mean preapplication temperature was compared across each measurement depth and treatment condition.
Non-ice treatments (control, C, E, and CE; means 33.4, 34.5, 33.7, and 34.6, respectively) had warmer intramuscular temperatures than any treatment that included ice (I, IC, IE, and ICE; means 28.4, 19.8, 28.0, and 19.3, respectively). There were no differences between IC and ICE (means 19.8 and 19.3, respectively). Ice alone was different from everything (Control, C, E, IC, CE, and ICE) except IE Conclusions: Elevation does not appear to play a role in temperature changes during cryotherapy treatments.
冰敷、加压和抬高(即ICE)是治疗急性肌肉骨骼损伤广泛使用的方法。冰敷和加压对组织温度的影响已得到证实,但冷冻疗法过程中抬高肢体是否会影响温度变化尚不清楚。抬高肢体有可能改变局部灌注,从而改变热损失/热增益的平衡,可能会影响冷冻疗法期间的组织冷却。
测量冰敷、加压和抬高对肌肉内温度的影响及相互作用。我们假设抬高肢体对肌肉内组织温度没有影响。
随机交叉研究设计。
大学运动训练设施。
共有15名健康志愿者(年龄20.93[1.67]岁)提供了知情同意并参与研究。
参与者完成8种治疗条件:不治疗(对照)、仅冰敷(I)、仅加压(C)、仅抬高(E)、冰敷和加压(IC)、冰敷和抬高(IE)、加压和抬高(CE)或冰敷、加压和抬高(ICE)。每种条件在每位参与者身上进行测试,每种条件之间至少间隔48小时。在1分钟的预治疗、30分钟的治疗和20分钟的治疗后期间,每30秒记录一次肌肉内温度。
比较每种测量深度和治疗条件下平均治疗温度与平均预治疗温度之间的温差。
非冰敷治疗(对照、C、E和CE;平均值分别为33.4、34.5、33.7和34.6)的肌肉内温度比任何包含冰敷的治疗(I、IC、IE和ICE;平均值分别为28.4、19.8、28.0和19.3)更高。IC和ICE之间没有差异(平均值分别为19.8和19.3)。除IE外,仅冰敷与其他所有情况(对照、C、E、IC、CE和ICE)均不同。结论:在冷冻疗法治疗过程中,抬高肢体似乎对温度变化没有作用。