Alhetheel Abdulkarim, Altalhi Haifa, Albarrag Ahmed, Shakoor Zahid, Mohamed Deqa, El-Hazmi Malak, Somily Ali, Barry Mazin, Bakhrebah Muhammed, Nassar Majed
1 King Khalid University Hospital , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia .
2 Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia .
Viral Immunol. 2017 Nov;30(9):649-653. doi: 10.1089/vim.2017.0091. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) causes severe respiratory disease with significant mortality. Two testing methods are currently used for MERS-CoV diagnostics: nucleic acid detection (the gold standard) and serological analysis. In this study, we evaluated the detection of MERS-CoV-IgG in suspected and proven cases of MERS-CoV infection. We enrolled 174 patients: 113 had respiratory symptoms/suspected MERS-CoV infection, 31 had confirmed influenza A or B infection, 23 had a recent confirmed MERS-CoV infection, and 7 had confirmed MERS-CoV infection 1 year before. All underwent MERS-CoV RNA and MERS-CoV-IgG testing. Thirty patients were found to be MERS-CoV RNA positive; however, during serological analysis, only 6 (3.4%) patients were positive for MERS-CoV-IgG, 1 (0.6%) patient was equivocal, and 167 (96%) patients were negative. Among the serological positives, four were recently MERS-CoV RNA positive and two were MERS-CoV RNA negative. No cross-reactivity to influenza A or B was detected. Based on the lack of correlation between nucleic acid and serological analysis, we conclude that MERS-CoV-IgG testing may not be suitable for diagnosing acute infection or estimating its prevalence during an outbreak. In addition, our findings show that MERS-CoV-IgG may not have significant value in determining disease severity or prognosis.
中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)可引发严重的呼吸道疾病,死亡率颇高。目前,针对MERS-CoV的诊断采用两种检测方法:核酸检测(金标准)和血清学分析。在本研究中,我们评估了疑似和确诊的MERS-CoV感染病例中MERS-CoV-IgG的检测情况。我们纳入了174例患者:113例有呼吸道症状/疑似MERS-CoV感染,31例确诊为甲型或乙型流感感染,23例近期确诊为MERS-CoV感染,7例在1年前确诊为MERS-CoV感染。所有患者均接受了MERS-CoV RNA和MERS-CoV-IgG检测。结果发现30例患者MERS-CoV RNA呈阳性;然而,在血清学分析中,只有6例(3.4%)患者MERS-CoV-IgG呈阳性,1例(0.6%)患者结果不明确,167例(96%)患者呈阴性。在血清学阳性的患者中,4例近期MERS-CoV RNA呈阳性,2例MERS-CoV RNA呈阴性。未检测到与甲型或乙型流感的交叉反应。基于核酸检测和血清学分析之间缺乏相关性,我们得出结论,MERS-CoV-IgG检测可能不适用于诊断急性感染或评估疫情期间的感染率。此外,我们的研究结果表明,MERS-CoV-IgG在确定疾病严重程度或预后方面可能没有显著价值。