Delle-Vedove Roxane, Schatz Bertrand, Dufay Mathilde
Universite de Lille, CNRS UMR 8198 Evo-Eco-Paleo, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France.
CEFE (Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive), UMR 5175, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier, EPHE, 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier, France.
Ann Bot. 2017 Jul 1;120(1):1-20. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx055.
Among the various floral traits involved in pollinator attraction and potentially under selection mediated by pollinators, floral scent/fragrance has been less investigated than other components of floral phenotype. Whether or not pollinator-mediated selection impacts floral scents depends on the heritability of scent/fragrance and the occurrence of some variation within species. Although most studies have investigated how scent varies among species, growing amounts of data are available on variation at the intraspecific level.
The results of 81 studies investigating intraspecific variation of floral scents in 132 taxa were reviewed. For each study, whether variation was found in either identity, proportion or absolute quantities of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was recorded, as well as information with the potential to explain variation, such as methodology, plant origin or pollination biology.
Variation was found for almost all investigated species, both among individuals (among and sometimes within populations) and within individuals across different temporal scales. Cases in which such variation is a possible result of pollinator-mediated selection were analysed, by discussing separately selection related to variation in pollinator identity/behaviour among populations or across time, deceit pollination and sex-specific selection. Not surprisingly, in many cases, pollinator-mediated selection alone does not explain the observed variation in floral scent. This led us to review current knowledge on less investigated factors, such as selection mediated by natural enemies, genetic drift and gene flow, environmental constraints, phylogenetic inertia, or biochemical constraints that could be invoked to explain scent variation.
This review highlights the great potential of analysing floral scent variation and including it in integrated studies of floral phenotypes. We also have identified the current gaps in our understanding of this complex signal and we propose several methodological and conceptual future directions in this research area.
在参与吸引传粉者且可能受到传粉者介导选择的各种花部性状中,花香/香气相比花部表型的其他组成部分受到的研究较少。传粉者介导的选择是否会影响花香取决于香气的遗传力以及物种内部是否存在某些变异。尽管大多数研究调查了不同物种间香气的差异,但种内水平变异的数据也越来越多。
对81项研究的结果进行了综述,这些研究调查了132个分类单元的花香种内变异。对于每项研究,记录了挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的种类、比例或绝对含量是否存在变异,以及可能解释变异的信息,如方法、植物来源或授粉生物学。
几乎所有被研究的物种都存在变异,包括个体间(种群间以及有时在种群内)和个体在不同时间尺度上的变异。通过分别讨论与种群间或不同时间传粉者身份/行为变异、欺骗性授粉和性别特异性选择相关的选择,分析了这种变异可能是传粉者介导选择结果的情况。不出所料,在许多情况下,仅传粉者介导的选择并不能解释观察到的花香变异。这促使我们回顾关于较少研究因素的现有知识,如天敌介导的选择、遗传漂变和基因流动、环境限制、系统发育惯性或生化限制,这些因素可用于解释香气变异。
本综述强调了分析花香变异并将其纳入花部表型综合研究的巨大潜力。我们还确定了目前在理解这一复杂信号方面的差距,并提出了该研究领域未来的几个方法和概念方向。