Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Oyun Onosh Medical Center, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Clin Neuroradiol. 2019 Mar;29(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/s00062-017-0622-8. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has an important impact in diagnosing primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS). However, neuroradiologic findings may vary immensely, making an easy and definite diagnosis challenging.
In this retrospective, single center study, we analyzed neuroradiologic findings of patients with PACNS diagnosed at our hospital between 2009 and 2014. Furthermore, we classified patients according to the affected vessel size and compared imaging characteristics between the subgroups.
Thirty-three patients were included (mean age 43 [±15.3] years, 17 females) in this study. Patients with positive angiographic findings were classified as either medium or large vessel PACNS and presented more ischemic lesions (p < 0.001) and vessel wall enhancement (p = 0.017) compared to patients with small vessel PACNS. No significant differences were detected for the distribution of contrast-enhancing lesions (parenchymal or leptomeningeal), hemorrhages, or lesions with mass effect. Twenty-five patients underwent brain biopsy. Patients with medium or large vessel PACNS were less likely to have positive biopsy results.
It is essential to differentiate between small and medium/large vessel PACNS since results in MRI, digital subtraction angiography and brain biopsy may differ immensely. Since image quality of MR scanners improves gradually and brain biopsy may often be nonspecific or negative, our results emphasize the importance of MRI/MRA in the diagnosis process of PACNS.
磁共振成像(MRI)在诊断中枢神经系统原发性血管炎(PACNS)中具有重要作用。然而,神经影像学表现可能差异巨大,使得诊断变得困难。
在这项回顾性单中心研究中,我们分析了 2009 年至 2014 年间在我院诊断为 PACNS 的患者的神经影像学表现。此外,我们根据受累血管大小对患者进行分类,并比较了亚组之间的影像学特征。
本研究共纳入 33 例患者(平均年龄 43 [±15.3] 岁,17 例女性)。有阳性血管造影结果的患者被分类为中等或大血管 PACNS,与小血管 PACNS 相比,他们表现出更多的缺血性病变(p<0.001)和血管壁强化(p=0.017)。强化病变(实质或软脑膜)、出血或有占位效应的病变的分布无显著差异。25 例患者接受了脑活检。中等或大血管 PACNS 的患者活检结果阳性的可能性较小。
区分小血管和中/大血管 PACNS 至关重要,因为 MRI、数字减影血管造影和脑活检的结果可能差异巨大。由于磁共振扫描仪的图像质量逐渐提高,且脑活检通常可能不具有特异性或呈阴性,因此我们的结果强调了 MRI/MRA 在 PACNS 诊断过程中的重要性。