• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真实与虚假的 DRM 记忆:通过一项内隐任务检测到的差异

True and False DRM Memories: Differences Detected with an Implicit Task.

作者信息

Marini Maddalena, Agosta Sara, Mazzoni Giuliana, Barba Gianfranco Dalla, Sartori Giuseppe

机构信息

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Reggio Emilia, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 27;3:310. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00310. eCollection 2012.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00310
PMID:22969740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3427911/
Abstract

Memory is prone to illusions. When people are presented with lists of words associated with a non-presented critical lure, they produce a high level of false recognitions (false memories) for non-presented related stimuli indistinguishable, at the explicit level, from presented words (DRM paradigm). We assessed whether true and false DRM memories can be distinguished at the implicit level by using the autobiographical IAT (aIAT), a novel method based on indirect measures that permits to detect true autobiographical events encoded in the respondent's mind/brain. In our experiment, after a DRM task participants performed two aIATs: the first aimed at testing implicit memory for presented words (true-memories aIAT) and the second aimed at evaluating implicit memory for critical lures (false-memories aIAT). Specifically, the two aIATs assessed the association of presented words and critical lures with the logical dimension "true." Results showed that the aIAT detected a greater association of presented words than critical lures with the logical dimension "true." This result indicates that although true and false DRM memories are indistinguishable at the explicit level a different association of the true and false DRM memories with the logical dimension "true" can be detected at the implicit level, and suggests that the aIAT may be a sensitive instrument to detect differences between true and false DRM memories.

摘要

记忆容易产生错觉。当人们看到与未呈现的关键诱饵相关的单词列表时,他们会对未呈现的相关刺激产生高水平的错误识别(错误记忆),在显性层面上,这些刺激与呈现的单词无法区分(DRM范式)。我们通过使用自传式内隐联想测验(aIAT)来评估真假DRM记忆在隐性层面上是否可以区分,这是一种基于间接测量的新方法,能够检测被试脑海/大脑中编码的真实自传事件。在我们的实验中,在完成DRM任务后,参与者进行了两项aIAT:第一项旨在测试对呈现单词的内隐记忆(真实记忆aIAT),第二项旨在评估对关键诱饵的内隐记忆(错误记忆aIAT)。具体而言,这两项aIAT评估了呈现单词和关键诱饵与逻辑维度“真实”之间的关联。结果表明,aIAT检测到呈现单词与逻辑维度“真实”的关联比关键诱饵更强。这一结果表明,尽管真假DRM记忆在显性层面上无法区分,但在隐性层面上可以检测到真假DRM记忆与逻辑维度“真实”的不同关联,这表明aIAT可能是检测真假DRM记忆差异的灵敏工具。

相似文献

1
True and False DRM Memories: Differences Detected with an Implicit Task.真实与虚假的 DRM 记忆:通过一项内隐任务检测到的差异
Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 27;3:310. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00310. eCollection 2012.
2
Electrophysiological Correlates of the Autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT): Response Conflict and Conflict Resolution.自传体内隐联想测验(aIAT)的电生理关联:反应冲突与冲突解决
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Aug 30;10:391. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00391. eCollection 2016.
3
The autobiographical IAT: a review.自传体 IAT:综述。
Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 13;4:519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00519. eCollection 2013.
4
Autobiographical Implicit Association Test and eye movements: fixations topography enables detection of autobiographical memories.自传体内隐联想测验与眼动:注视地形图能够检测出自传体记忆。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 29;15:1268256. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1268256. eCollection 2024.
5
The effect of early list manipulations on the DRM illusion.早期列表操作对 DRM 错觉的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Nov;74(11):1924-1934. doi: 10.1177/17470218211012620. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
6
Associative strength or gist extraction: Which matters when DRM lists have two critical lures?联想强度还是要点提取:当DRM列表中有两个关键诱饵时,哪个更重要?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Mar;72(3):570-578. doi: 10.1177/1747021818761002. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
7
Exploring the consequences of nonbelieved memories in the DRM paradigm.探索DRM范式中未被相信的记忆的后果。
Memory. 2017 Aug;25(7):922-933. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1272701. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
8
[False memory in normal aging: empirical data from the DRM paradigm and theoretical perspectives].[正常衰老中的错误记忆:来自DRM范式的实证数据及理论视角]
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2020 Mar 1;18(1):65-75. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2020.0842.
9
Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception.虚假记忆与欺骗的新方法及认知神经科学视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 21;13:721961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.721961. eCollection 2022.
10
False recognitions in the DRM paradigm: the role of stress and warning.DRM 范式中的错误识别:压力和警告的作用。
Cogn Process. 2022 Feb;23(1):99-107. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01062-1. Epub 2021 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Implicit Associations between Adverbs of Place and Actions in the Physical and Digital Space.物理空间和数字空间中地点副词与动作之间的隐性关联。
Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 17;11(11):1523. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111523.
2
The mnemonic effects of insight on false memory in the DRM paradigm.DRM范式中洞察力对错误记忆的记忆术效应。
Psychol Res. 2022 Mar;86(2):558-570. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01513-6. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
3
Electrophysiological Correlates of the Autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT): Response Conflict and Conflict Resolution.自传体内隐联想测验(aIAT)的电生理关联:反应冲突与冲突解决
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Aug 30;10:391. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00391. eCollection 2016.
4
Memory and self-neuroscientific landscapes.记忆与自我——神经科学视域
ISRN Neurosci. 2013 May 14;2013:176027. doi: 10.1155/2013/176027. eCollection 2013.
5
The autobiographical IAT: a review.自传体 IAT:综述。
Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 13;4:519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00519. eCollection 2013.
6
Source confusion influences the effectiveness of the autobiographical IAT.来源混淆会影响自传体 IAT 的有效性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1232-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0430-3.

本文引用的文献

1
True and phantom recollection: an fMRI investigation of similar and distinct neural correlates and connectivity.真实和虚假记忆:相似和不同神经关联及连接的 fMRI 研究。
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2982-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.079. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
2
Age-related changes in neural activity associated with familiarity, recollection and false recognition.与熟悉度、回忆和错误识别相关的与年龄相关的神经活动变化。
Neurobiol Aging. 2010 Oct;31(10):1814-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.014. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
3
How to accurately detect autobiographical events.如何准确检测自传性事件。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Aug;19(8):772-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02156.x.
4
Trusting our memories: dissociating the neural correlates of confidence in veridical versus illusory memories.相信我们的记忆:区分对真实记忆与虚幻记忆的信心的神经关联。
J Neurosci. 2007 Nov 7;27(45):12190-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3408-07.2007.
5
The neural correlates of conceptual and perceptual false recognition.概念性和感知性错误识别的神经关联。
Learn Mem. 2007 Oct 1;14(10):684-92. doi: 10.1101/lm.695707. Print 2007 Oct.
6
The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory.内侧颞叶与识别记忆。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:123-52. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094328.
7
Neural correlates of memory confidence.记忆信心的神经关联
Neuroimage. 2006 Dec;33(4):1188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Oct 9.
8
When true memory availability promotes false memory: evidence from confabulating patients.当真实记忆可用性引发错误记忆:来自虚构症患者的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(10):1866-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.008. Epub 2006 Mar 31.
9
Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.区分识别记忆中涉及回忆和熟悉感的脑区。
J Neurosci. 2005 Mar 16;25(11):3002-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5295-04.2005.
10
A sensory signature that distinguishes true from false memories.一种区分真实记忆与虚假记忆的感觉特征。
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jun;7(6):664-72. doi: 10.1038/nn1252. Epub 2004 May 23.