• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用“PainVision™ 系统”评估健康受试者在去除伤口敷料材料过程中的疼痛强度测量,用于感知和疼痛感觉的定量分析。

Evaluation of pain intensity measurement during the removal of wound dressing material using 'the PainVision™ system' for quantitative analysis of perception and pain sensation in healthy subjects.

机构信息

FACS Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2012 Aug;9(4):451-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00911.x. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00911.x
PMID:22264336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7950669/
Abstract

Reducing pain caused by the removal of adhesive wound dressing materials is very important in clinical practice and is also one of the factors to consider when choosing dressing materials. A visual analogue scale is the most popular method for assessing pain, but it is subjective and is difficult to evaluate quantitatively or statistically. Recently, a new method for the quantitative measurement of pain intensity using a painless electrical stimulation system, PainVision™, has been developed. In this study, we evaluated pain intensity during the removal of wound dressing materials in healthy volunteers by comparing pain during the removal of wound dressing materials, which use acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive and pain during the removal of materials, which use soft silicone adhesive, as evaluated using the PainVision™ system. Pain intensity was significantly lower with the dressing materials, which use soft silicone adhesive when measured with the PainVision™ system. The PainVision™ system promises to be useful for the quantitative assessment of pain caused by the removal of adhesive wound dressing materials. Further studies are needed to determine whether the PainVision™ system is also effective in measuring pain caused by the removal of wound dressing materials in actual wounds.

摘要

减轻粘性伤口敷料去除引起的疼痛在临床实践中非常重要,也是选择敷料时需要考虑的因素之一。视觉模拟评分法是评估疼痛最常用的方法,但它具有主观性,难以进行定量或统计学评估。最近,一种使用无痛电刺激系统(PainVision™)定量测量疼痛强度的新方法已经开发出来。在这项研究中,我们通过比较使用丙烯酸压敏胶的伤口敷料去除时的疼痛和使用柔软硅酮胶的伤口敷料去除时的疼痛,使用 PainVision™ 系统评估了健康志愿者去除伤口敷料时的疼痛强度。使用 PainVision™ 系统测量时,使用柔软硅酮胶的敷料材料的疼痛强度明显更低。PainVision™ 系统有望用于评估粘性伤口敷料去除引起的疼痛的定量评估。需要进一步的研究来确定 PainVision™ 系统是否也能有效测量实际伤口中去除伤口敷料引起的疼痛。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of pain intensity measurement during the removal of wound dressing material using 'the PainVision™ system' for quantitative analysis of perception and pain sensation in healthy subjects.使用“PainVision™ 系统”评估健康受试者在去除伤口敷料材料过程中的疼痛强度测量,用于感知和疼痛感觉的定量分析。
Int Wound J. 2012 Aug;9(4):451-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00911.x. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
2
A model for quantitative evaluation of skin damage at adhesive wound dressing removal.一种定量评估粘性伤口敷料去除时皮肤损伤的模型。
Int Wound J. 2013 Jun;10(3):291-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.00975.x. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
3
Removal of adhesive wound dressing and its effects on the stratum corneum of the skin: comparison of eight different adhesive wound dressings.移除粘性伤口敷料及其对皮肤角质层的影响:八种不同粘性伤口敷料的比较。
Int Wound J. 2014 Feb;11(1):50-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01061.x. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
4
Assessing pain at wound dressing-related procedures.评估伤口换药相关操作时的疼痛情况。
Nurs Times. 2004;100(41):56-7.
5
Dressing-related pain in patients with chronic wounds: an international patient perspective.慢性伤口患者与敷料相关的疼痛:国际患者视角
Int Wound J. 2008 Jun;5(2):159-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00471.x.
6
The importance of pain reduction through dressing selection in routine wound management: the MAPP study.在常规伤口处理中通过敷料选择减轻疼痛的重要性:MAPP研究
J Wound Care. 2004 Nov;13(10):409-13. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2004.13.10.27268.
7
Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing a tissue adhesive (Dermabond™) with adhesive strips (Steri-Strips™) for the closure of laparoscopic trocar wounds in children.一项前瞻性、随机对照试验,比较组织粘合剂(皮肤邦™)与粘合带(无菌手术薄膜™)用于儿童腹腔镜套管针伤口闭合的效果。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2011 May;21(3):159-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270458. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
8
Unravelling nocebo effect: the mediating effect of anxiety between anticipation and pain at wound dressing change.揭开反安慰剂效应:换药时预期与疼痛之间焦虑的中介作用。
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Jul;24(13-14):1975-84. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12858. Epub 2015 May 28.
9
A clinical tool to predict severe pain during wound dressing changes.一种预测伤口换药时剧烈疼痛的临床工具。
Pain. 2022 Sep 1;163(9):1716-1727. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002553. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
10
The link between the peel force of adhesive dressings and subjective discomfort in volunteer subjects.粘性敷料的剥离力与志愿者主观不适之间的联系。
J Wound Care. 2003 Jul;12(7):260-2. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2003.12.7.26567.

引用本文的文献

1
Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex sensing analgesia.背外侧前额叶皮层感知镇痛。
Biophys Physicobiol. 2022 Apr 8;19:1-10. doi: 10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v19.0014. eCollection 2022.
2
Relevance of cortisol and copeptin blood concentration changes in an experimental pain model.皮质醇和 copeptin 血液浓度变化在实验性疼痛模型中的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 19;12(1):4767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08657-4.
3
How Should Clinical Wound Care and Management Translate to Effective Engineering Standard Testing Requirements from Foam Dressings? Mapping the Existing Gaps and Needs.泡沫敷料的临床伤口护理和管理如何转化为有效的工程标准测试要求?映射现有差距和需求。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2024 Jan;13(1):34-52. doi: 10.1089/wound.2021.0173. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
4
The Relationship Between Evaluation Methods for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.化疗诱导性周围神经病评估方法的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 30;9(1):20361. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56969-9.
5
Evaluation of vascular pain in patients with colorectal cancer receiving peripheral venous chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin.评估接受外周静脉化疗(含或不含奥沙利铂)的结直肠癌患者的血管性疼痛。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 12;9(1):1819. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37966-w.
6
Effects of sedation on subjective perception of pain intensity and autonomic nervous responses to pain: A preliminary study.镇静对疼痛强度主观感受及疼痛自主神经反应的影响:一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):e0183635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183635. eCollection 2017.
7
Can Wound Exudate from Venous Leg Ulcers Measure Wound Pain Status?: A Pilot Study.下肢静脉溃疡的伤口渗出液能否衡量伤口疼痛状况?一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0167478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167478. eCollection 2016.
8
Objective evaluation of oxaliplatin-induced vascular pain secondary to peripheral vein administration.奥沙利铂外周静脉给药继发血管性疼痛的客观评估
Springerplus. 2016 Oct 26;5(1):1872. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3579-1. eCollection 2016.
9
Sensory cognitive abnormalities of pain in autism spectrum disorder: a case-control study.自闭症谱系障碍中疼痛的感觉认知异常:一项病例对照研究。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 5;15:8. doi: 10.1186/s12991-016-0095-1. eCollection 2016.
10
Subjective and objective assessment of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy.奥沙利铂所致周围神经病变的主观与客观评估
Springerplus. 2015 Dec 30;4:822. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1646-7. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
[PainVision].[疼痛视觉]
Masui. 2009 Nov;58(11):1367-72.
2
Effects of adhesive dressings on the stratum corneum of the skin.粘性敷料对皮肤角质层的影响。
J Wound Care. 2001 Feb;10(2):7-10. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2001.10.2.26054.
3
The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement.修订版面部疼痛量表:迈向儿科疼痛测量的通用指标
Pain. 2001 Aug;93(2):173-183. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00314-1.
4
The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.临床疼痛强度的测量:六种方法的比较。
Pain. 1986 Oct;27(1):117-126. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9.
5
Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review.视觉模拟量表的临床应用:一项批判性综述。
Psychol Med. 1988 Nov;18(4):1007-19. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700009934.