• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

香烟成分对吸烟者的健康影响:化学物质、图像和来源的作用。

Cigarette Constituent Health Communications for Smokers: Impact of Chemical, Imagery, and Source.

机构信息

Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 May 21;21(6):841-845. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx226.

DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntx226
PMID:29059359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6528144/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Communication campaigns are incorporating tobacco constituent messaging to reach smokers, yet there is a dearth of research on how such messages should be constructed or will be received by smokers.

METHODS

In a 2 × 2 × 2 experiment, we manipulated three cigarette constituent message components: (1) the toxic constituent of tobacco (arsenic vs. lead) with a corresponding health effect, (2) the presence or absence of an evocative image, and (3) the source of the message (FDA vs. no source). We recruited smokers (N = 1669, 55.4% women) via an online platform and randomized them to one of the eight message conditions. Participants viewed the message and rated its believability and perceived effectiveness, the credibility of the message source, and action expectancies (ie, likelihood of seeking additional information and help with quitting as a result of seeing the message).

RESULTS

We found significant main effects of image, constituent, and source on outcomes. The use of arsenic as the constituent, the presence of an evocative image, and the FDA as the source increased the believability, source credibility, and perceived effectiveness of the tobacco constituent health message.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple elements of a constituent message, including type of constituent, imagery, and message source, impact their reception among smokers. Specifically, communication campaigns targeting smokers that utilize arsenic as the tobacco constituent, visual imagery, and the FDA logo may be particularly effective in changing key outcomes that are associated with subsequent attitude and behavioral changes.

IMPLICATIONS

This article describes how components of communication campaigns about cigarette constituents are perceived. Multiple elements of a tobacco constituent message, including type of constituent, image, and message source may influence the reception of messages among current smokers. Communication campaigns targeting smokers that utilize arsenic as the tobacco constituent, visual imagery, and the FDA logo may be particularly effective in changing key outcomes among smokers. The effects of such campaigns should be examined, as well as the mechanisms through which such campaigns affect change.

摘要

简介

传播活动正在将烟草成分信息纳入其中,以接触吸烟者,但关于此类信息应该如何构建以及吸烟者将如何接收这些信息的研究还很少。

方法

在一项 2×2×2 的实验中,我们操纵了三个香烟成分信息的组成部分:(1)烟草中的有毒成分(砷与铅)及其对应的健康影响,(2)是否使用有感染力的图片,以及(3)信息来源(FDA 或无来源)。我们通过在线平台招募了吸烟者(N=1669,55.4%为女性),并将他们随机分配到八种信息条件中的一种。参与者观看了信息,并对其可信度和感知效果、信息来源的可信度以及行动预期(即,由于看到该信息而寻求更多信息和戒烟帮助的可能性)进行了评价。

结果

我们发现图片、成分和来源对结果有显著的主效应。使用砷作为成分、使用有感染力的图片以及 FDA 作为来源会增加烟草成分健康信息的可信度、来源可信度和感知效果。

结论

成分信息的多个元素,包括成分类型、图像和信息来源,会影响吸烟者对其的接受程度。具体来说,针对吸烟者的宣传活动,如果使用砷作为烟草成分、使用视觉图像和 FDA 标志,可能特别有效,因为它们会改变与后续态度和行为变化相关的关键结果。

意义

本文描述了吸烟者如何感知香烟成分信息的各个组成部分。烟草成分信息的多个元素,包括成分类型、图像和信息来源,可能会影响当前吸烟者对信息的接受程度。针对吸烟者的宣传活动,如果使用砷作为烟草成分、使用视觉图像和 FDA 标志,可能特别有效,因为这些元素可以改变吸烟者的关键结果。应该对这类宣传活动的效果以及这些活动通过哪些机制影响变化进行研究。

相似文献

1
Cigarette Constituent Health Communications for Smokers: Impact of Chemical, Imagery, and Source.香烟成分对吸烟者的健康影响:化学物质、图像和来源的作用。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 May 21;21(6):841-845. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx226.
2
Effects of Framing Proximal Benefits of Quitting and Motivation to Quit as a Query on Communications About Tobacco Constituents.将戒烟的近期益处及戒烟动机设定为一个问题进行框架构建对烟草成分相关沟通的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1178-1184. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw317.
3
Identifying principles for effective messages about chemicals in cigarette smoke.确定关于香烟烟雾中化学物质的有效信息的原则。
Prev Med. 2018 Jan;106:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
4
Visual Attention to the Source Matters: Using Eye Tracking to Understand the FDA's 'Every Try Counts' Campaign Message Effectiveness.对信息来源的视觉关注很重要:利用眼动追踪来理解美国食品药品监督管理局的“每一次尝试都重要”宣传活动信息的有效性。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Feb 1;24(2):280-284. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab185.
5
Testing Cessation Messages for Cigarette Package Inserts: Findings from a Best/Worst Discrete Choice Experiment.测试香烟包装插页中的戒烟信息:来自最佳/最差离散选择实验的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 6;15(2):282. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020282.
6
Effect of Cigarette Constituent Messages With Engagement Text on Intention to Quit Smoking Among Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.香烟成分信息与参与式文本对有吸烟习惯的成年人戒烟意愿的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e210045. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0045.
7
Effective Message Elements for Disclosures About Chemicals in Cigarette Smoke.关于香烟烟雾中化学物质披露的有效信息要素。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Aug 14;20(9):1047-1054. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx109.
8
Targeted Versus Nontargeted Communication About Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems in Three Smoker Groups.针对三种吸烟群体的电子烟传递系统的目标化与非目标化沟通。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 21;15(10):2071. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102071.
9
Believability of Cigarette Warnings About Addiction: National Experiments of Adolescents and Adults.关于成瘾的香烟警示语可信度:青少年和成年人的全国性实验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Jun 7;20(7):867-875. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx185.
10
Do Smokers Recall Source or Quitline on Cigarette Constituent Messages?吸烟者会记得香烟成分信息的来源或戒烟热线吗?
Tob Regul Sci. 2018 Nov;4(6):66-82. doi: 10.18001/TRS.4.6.7.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of a reduced nicotine policy and predictors of policy support: A nationally representative U.S. survey.减少尼古丁政策的认知和政策支持的预测因素:一项具有全国代表性的美国调查。
Prev Med. 2024 Jul;184:107952. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107952. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
2
Messaging about very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNCs) to influence policy attitudes, harm perceptions and smoking motivations: a discrete choice experiment.关于极低尼古丁香烟(VLNCs)的信息传递,以影响政策态度、危害认知和吸烟动机:一项离散选择实验。
Tob Control. 2024 Apr 19;33(3):325-332. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057577.
3
Characterising trusted spokespeople in noncommunicable disease prevention: A systematic scoping review.非传染性疾病预防中可信代言人的特征:一项系统的范围综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jul 28;29:101934. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101934. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Effect of Cigarette Constituent Messages With Engagement Text on Intention to Quit Smoking Among Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.香烟成分信息与参与式文本对有吸烟习惯的成年人戒烟意愿的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e210045. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0045.
5
Development and Pretesting of Hookah Tobacco Public Education Messages for Young Adults.开发和预测试水烟烟草对年轻人的公共教育信息。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 25;17(23):8752. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238752.
6
Effect of risk messages on risk appraisals, attitudes, ambivalence, and willingness to smoke hookah in young adults.风险信息对年轻人水烟吸食风险评估、态度、矛盾心理及意愿的影响。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2020;8(1):96-109. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2020.1730844. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
7
Should Graphic Warning Labels Proposed for Cigarette Packages Sold in the United States Mention the Food and Drug Administration?美国拟议的香烟包装图形警示标签是否应提及美国食品和药物管理局?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Jan 22;23(2):402-406. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa142.
8
An Eye Tracking Study of Anti-Smoking Messages on Toxic Chemicals in Cigarettes.一项关于香烟中有毒化学物质反吸烟信息的眼动追踪研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 12;16(22):4435. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224435.
9
Do Smokers Recall Source or Quitline on Cigarette Constituent Messages?吸烟者会记得香烟成分信息的来源或戒烟热线吗?
Tob Regul Sci. 2018 Nov;4(6):66-82. doi: 10.18001/TRS.4.6.7.
10
Testing a Brief Web-based Intervention to Increase Recognition of Tobacco Constituents.测试一种基于网络的简短干预措施以提高对烟草成分的认知。
Tob Regul Sci. 2018 Nov;4(6):83-94. doi: 10.18001/TRS.4.6.8.

本文引用的文献

1
Believability of Cigarette Warnings About Addiction: National Experiments of Adolescents and Adults.关于成瘾的香烟警示语可信度:青少年和成年人的全国性实验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Jun 7;20(7):867-875. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx185.
2
Perceptions of the Food and Drug Administration as a Tobacco Regulator.对美国食品药品监督管理局作为烟草监管机构的认知。
Tob Regul Sci. 2017 Apr;3(2):239-247. doi: 10.18001/TRS.3.2.12. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
3
Development of the FDA Tobacco Credibility Scale (FDA-TCS).美国食品药品监督管理局烟草可信度量表(FDA-TCS)的开发。
Tob Regul Sci. 2017 Jan;3(1):47-55. doi: 10.18001/TRS.3.1.5.
4
Believability of new diseases reported in the 2014 Surgeon General's Report on smoking: Experimental results from a national survey of US adults.2014年美国卫生局局长关于吸烟问题报告中所提及的新疾病的可信度:一项针对美国成年人的全国性调查的实验结果
Prev Med. 2017 Jun;99:94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
5
Believability of Cigar Warning Labels Among Adolescents.青少年对雪茄警示标签的可信度。
J Adolesc Health. 2017 Mar;60(3):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
6
Public understanding of cigarette smoke constituents: three US surveys.美国三项关于公众对香烟烟雾成分了解情况的调查。
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;26(5):592-599. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052897. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
7
The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.强化香烟包装警示的影响:纵向观察性研究的系统评价
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:118-129. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
8
Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies.香烟包装图案警示:实验研究的荟萃分析
Tob Control. 2016 May;25(3):341-54. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051978. Epub 2015 May 6.
9
Smokers' and nonsmokers' beliefs about harmful tobacco constituents: implications for FDA communication efforts.吸烟者和不吸烟者对有害烟草成分的看法:对 FDA 沟通工作的启示。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Mar;16(3):343-50. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt158. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
10
Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.评估亚马逊土耳其机器人作为实验行为研究工具。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410. Epub 2013 Mar 13.